If we could trade Conley for Bledsoe, I'd probably do that. We'd have to take more though. Maybe Bledsoe and Hill. Still seems very complicated.
If it's Bledsoe for Conley straight up, then do it. We then go add Jerami Grant in free agency. No brainer really.If they let Favors go I'm not sure sure we do need to take more.
Anywho, they can't trade Bledsoe with anyone else because he just got traded.
You did propose a Hayward reunion. LolI’ll see myself out
If it's Bledsoe for Conley straight up, then do it. We then go add Jerami Grant in free agency. No brainer really.
I just gave you the numbers; you're misinformed. Per Capulator:I need for a cap expert to chime in. From what I understand, we are $18 million under the luxury.
I just gave you the numbers; you're misinformed. Per Capulator:
Conley: $34,502,130
Gobert: $26,525,281
Bogdanovic: $17,850,000
Ingles: $10,863,637
O'Neale: $8,500,000
Mitchell: $5,195,501
Azubuike (#27): $2,119,320
Hughes (minimum): $898,310
Total: $106,454,179
LT: $132,627,000
Space under LT: $26,172,821
No you don't. Those spots will ultimately be filled by players.Gotta factor in the minimum cap holds for each roster slot (same $ amount as Hughes I believe)
So you can say that we have $26 to allocate for 6 players while staying under the luxury. It's not like we can go out and give Clarkson his estimated $10+, use the full MLE and stay under the luxury unless we are filling out the roster with a bunch of 2nd round contract types.No you don't. Those spots will ultimately be filled by players.
Outside of re-signing JC and using the MLE and BAE, the Jazz are only permitted to sign minimum players, just like every other team over the salary cap. If JC signs a contract starting at ~$10 mil, the Jazz have plenty of room under the LT to use the full MLE. If they're willing to creep into the LT a little, they have plenty of room to use the BAE and stay below the apron.So you can say that we have $26 to allocate for 6 players while staying under the luxury. It's not like we can go out and give Clarkson his estimated $10+, use the full MLE and stay under the luxury unless we are filling out the roster with a bunch of 2nd round contract types.
No you don't. Those spots will ultimately be filled by players.
The point is to show how much money the jazz have to fill the roster, so it makes no sense to include roster holds. The Jazz have $26 million under the LT to sign 6 or 7 players.What a non-statement, yes, we are required by the CBA to fill another 5-6 roster slots. We only have the minimum available for them outside of the exceptions. It doesn't matter who those guys are, it's stupid to not include their salaries in cap calculations, it's not like they don't count against the tax.
The point is to show how much money the jazz have to fill the roster, so it makes no sense to include roster holds. The Jazz have $26 million under the LT to sign 6 or 7 players.
Actually by NBA rules you HAVE to include minimum cap holds for untaken roster spots up until roster spot 12(included). Also... the MLE AFAIK is also added to our salary cap until it's used or renounced.The point is to show how much money the jazz have to fill the roster, so it makes no sense to include roster holds. The Jazz have $26 million under the LT to sign 6 or 7 players.
Actually by NBA rules you HAVE to include minimum cap holds for untaken roster spots up until roster spot 12(included). Also... the MLE AFAIK is also added to our salary cap until it's used or renounced.
But enough with technicalities. Something that worries me is Tony Jones' participation on a Sam Vecenie podcast prior to the draft. Tony was one of the Jazz beat writers that actually got Udoka's pick right so... he might have some insider info. But back to his podcast with Vecenie - there he said Clarkson is Jazz' no. 1 priority in the off-season and floated a number between 15 and 20M PER YEAR for his contract. Now is this a number he's hearing from Jazz FO/Clarkson agent? Or is this his personal opinion on what we should expect? I don't know but it absolutely makes sense in light of the Jazz giving up 3 2nd rounders to clear space. In essence we will have the MLE+ about 15-18M to resign Clarkson. To me it looks like he might be right and we might indeed be on the verge of overpaying Clarkson for the foreseeable future.
I will take to the streets if they sign Clarkson for that. That is insane.Something that worries me is Tony Jones' participation on a Sam Vecenie podcast prior to the draft. Tony was one of the Jazz beat writers that actually got Udoka's pick right so... he might have some insider info. But back to his podcast with Vecenie - there he said Clarkson is Jazz' no. 1 priority in the off-season and floated a number between 15 and 20M PER YEAR for his contract. Now is this a number he's hearing from Jazz FO/Clarkson agent? Or is this his personal opinion on what we should expect? I don't know but it absolutely makes sense in light of the Jazz giving up 3 2nd rounders to clear space. In essence we will have the MLE+ about 15-18M to resign Clarkson. To me it looks like he might be right and we might indeed be on the verge of overpaying Clarkson for the foreseeable future.