Still waiting on this proof that Trump's lawyer said was coming in like it was coming out of a firehose.
Pretty sure that hose will not be re-routed to you.
You're the guy who thinks Machiavelli is a good old Joe, who sees political manipulation of the ********people as a moral good. You don't care about facts.
There are a lot of people who have stopped caring to ignore the facts you won't see.
This is a civil case, and there are in some places judges who are part of the problem, maybe even the Supreme Court. It takes a lot of work to gather the kind of evidence and get it to the right place, and time is short. And if there is no court that will care to do the job, I don't think Trump cares to get it out there. The best use of the evidence then is in prosecutions of the people who have done wrong. One by one.
I think over a thousand people were convicted in the past two years of crimes of this sort, nationwide. And I think the right stat here is that 0.0001% of the actual crimes are prosecuted.
I think Tom Fitton will be getting a lot of donations to help in that work, and maybe there will be 10,000 convictions for this year.
I hope Sydney Powell adequately prosecuted the Dominion voting issues and gets such machines discredited and maybe a better computer system with no vulnerabilities for misuse brought to the market. At any rate, the politicians who signed on with Dominion and got kickbacks should be prosecuted.
I think the Left has lost credibility over a lot of things, and it will be dying on the vine in the coming era.
I have already explained to you how to estimate an "overvote" where the votes counted exceed the eligible voters. I have done those calculations for a number of areas in California for 2016. This year, due to public scrutiny, the vote claimed was 67% of registered voters, not 76% as in 2016. Looks to me like Tom Fitton's lawsuits got some attention, got some voter rolls cleaned up a bit, and made election official a little more modest about the fake vote efforts.
This year, in Pennsylvania, there were claims of 90% registration, and actual votes tabulated that exceeded the number of registered voters by 150,000.
The official stat on voter turnout was 73%, but there are only 8,600,000 eligible voters in PA, and they "registered" 8.1M, or 95% "resistration". The SOS claimed only 90% and reported that with a stat out of 9.25 "eligible voters", a clearly inflated stat. I'll be looking at those stats more closely. Never can be too sure they won't just morph on the records to something else overnight. I stop short of believing my own calculations when I have to use numbers out on the webz. But lets just say that the PA secretary of State and the US Census aren't on the same page. And it looks like there could be 300,000 to 650,000 "fake votes" tabulated.
I don't think the issues there will be resolved quickly, but I do believe some folks will be going to jail.