LoPo
Well-Known Member
Happy Holidays to you too actual douchebag.A well meaning one but yes an idiot nevertheless
Sent from my SM-G970U using JazzFanz mobile app
Happy Holidays to you too actual douchebag.A well meaning one but yes an idiot nevertheless
I can taste the tearsGreat game Conley.
Doesn't mean you are worth your contract or all that we gave up to get you.
But still, great game.
Guess that makes me an idiot.....
Sent from my SM-G970U using JazzFanz mobile app
This is the issue with the board idiots like lopo and yourself, everything is about next year or 2/3/4 years away. If yall had it yalls way we'd be in a constant state of preparing for the next season until the perfect moment where the entire roster is on fair contracts and everyone is a 25 year old all-star future HOF'er (this moment would ofc never exist but you would push your "potential" grift as long as you could)My problem with Conley is that I can't see him taking a huge pay cut to be able to remain on the team next year.. At the moment I feel like we are obligated to start him ..like we were with Rubio. My question is what will we be doing when we can't afford Mike next year and should we be be giving more minutes to someone else to prepare for that.
Nobody is paying Conley anywhere close to his current contract next year.My problem with Conley is that I can't see him taking a huge pay cut to be able to remain on the team next year.. At the moment I feel like we are obligated to start him ..like we were with Rubio. My question is what will we be doing when we can't afford Mike next year and should we be be giving more minutes to someone else to prepare for that.
Our roster is pretty much fixed without Conley for the next 2 yrs (assuming no major trades) ..Nobody is paying Conley anywhere close to his current contract next year.
As far as I know, resigning Conley, as we have his bird rights, does not hard cap the Jazz in 2021. We would have about 6 million (taxpayer exception) to find a replacement for him in free agency.Our roster is pretty much fixed without Conley for the next 2 yrs (assuming no major trades) ..
Unless he is willing to sign for a MLE he is gone.. and even then other teams will probably be willing to pay more than that. Besides..this is a contract year for him so he will be trying to inflate his stats as much as possible this year to try to increase the value of his contract at free agency.
Basically we have 128Mil on the books for next year without Conley.. (and we also have other free agents that we might need to decide on keeping).. The probability is low that he will be around next year and even if we were thinking about resigning him, there could be some better options in free agency.
This isn't about potential .. this is about what our salary looks
My guess is he will get offered around 11-12 mil + by another team for a couple of yrs.. But the real question is how far into luxury tax do the Jazz want to go. But thanks didn't realise we had his bird rights.. But yeah if he were to resign for that or preferably less, I won't be complainingDo you think we could get a better player than Conley for 6 million?
Conley getting at least 30 over 2 years. Might be more like 35.My guess is he will get offered around 11-12 mil + by another team for a couple of yrs.. But the real question is how far into luxury tax do the Jazz want to go. But thanks didn't realise we had his bird rights.. But yeah if he were to resign for that or preferably less, I won't be complaining
I guess that could also open the door to a sign and trade deal if a better option reveals itself. Then yeah you are probably correct in that we should play him as much as reasonably feasible to assess his fitConley getting at least 30 over 2 years. Might be more like 35.
I mean it's about assets. Getting Conley for a couple years at 12-15 million gets us one more piece on the board that we can use or trade. We are in the luxury anyway. I think we could keep Conley AND spend the exception. It's hugely expensive, but it gives us one more NBA player. Hopefully we use it to pay one of our deep bench players that breaks out.I guess that could also open the door to a sign and trade deal if a better option reveals itself. Then yeah you are probably correct in that we should play him as much as reasonably feasible to assess his fit
This must be parody.
how bout now? lets hear the objective review, keyword being objective.. give it to me!!!ok all the genius who just knew that Mike wasn’t a good signing, has lost 5 steps overnight, can’t dribble et etc etc
Sign up and put your name to it so we can come review your opinion halfway thru the season
....
ok well now that uve had some time to see the dust settle what do you say