Straight utilitarianism? No, but we need to consider likelihoods. Besides, I already offered what could be an easy path forward for Lindsey where he keeps his job, if he really wants it.Almost no one isn't no one. Any lives destroyed by an accusation alone is too much. Or are you espousing straight utilitarianism in these scenarios? it is fine to hurt or even destroy a few as long as it is better for more people in the long run? Or are you better than that?
Still, that you even bring in "straight utilitarianism" means acknowledging that there is a differential in harms here.
To be fair, I might have gone at this a little hard, but it is because I have a couple of close friends who were directly impact by cancel culture. I will not discuss their situation because I told them I would not, but I will say they were both teachers, emphasis on "were". So when it is a real thing to a real person you know some of the ability to stand back and just try to brush it aside as if it isn't a thing goes out the window.
I don't know anything about their individual situations. I do know that other teachers have done things like changing school districts, when the level of national attention was low, but it may not be possible for your friends.
Too often, I see "cancel culture" used as an attempt to distract from real issues, to complain about the complainers. I appreciate that might not be your intention.I made no claims about the accusation itself. Anything along those lines are words put in my mouth, and you did that here as well, put words in my mouth. I was purely speaking out about cancel culture and the need people feel to immediately take any accusation at face value and be judge, jury, and executioner regardless of what the actual facts might be.