What's new

Holy piss, the Apollo moon missions were fake?!

Status
Not open for further replies.
The bumpy ride causes the flaps to go up but air is keeping them from coming back down.
Wow, what a completely stupid thing to say. Air resistance does not make foil pages go horizontal when they are in the front of a vehicle. Even that video talked about the hammer/feather experiment *on the same mission*.

These two videos show that the flag had started to move before he got close enough to touch it.
This happens in my house all the time, I walk, the floor vibrates, something shakes just a little bit.
 
Air resistance does not make foil pages go horizontal when they are in the front of a vehicle.
This is a little vague. Air seems to be keeping the flaps from falling back down. It looks totally consistent with the atmosphere explanation. Please go into some more detail.

This happens in my house all the time, I walk, the floor vibrates, something shakes just a little bit.
The only thing moving is the flag. If vibration were the explanation, the rod and pole would be moving and that movement would tranfer to the flag. The flag starts to move just before the astronaut gets close to it the way it would in air. Try it at home with a towel hanging from a ceiling light.


The Apollo Flag Air Compare

The Apollo Flag Moon Gag

Moon Mindset Madness


 
This guy is a sophist who knows that Apollo was a hoax.

Was the Moon Landing faked? | Big Questions with Neil deGrasse Tyson





They never show the clearest proof such as the flag moving when nobody touches it. They only deal with the stuff that's vague and easy to obfuscate.
 
This is a little vague. Air seems to be keeping the flaps from falling back down.
The flaps are the front of a moving vehicle. Air flow would either push the flaps up or push them down, not keep them horizontal.

Grab a sheet of paper, hold it in front of you with the front end unattached, and walk forward. Feel free to bounce up and down as much as you want. The paper will not stick out horizontally in front of you.

The only thing moving is the flag. If vibration were the explanation, the rod and pole would be moving and that movement would tranfer to the flag.
The rod and pole are moving, it's just harder to see because they are dark, and the movements are small.

The flag starts to move just before the astronaut gets close to it the way it would in air.
That's what I said, vibrations from the guy moving would move the flag. Vibrations from the ground are more than sufficient.

The truth is that, given the technology circa 1970, it would be harder to fake the moon landings than to go to the moon.
 
Anyone else see the latest confirmed UFO video?



I filmed a "UFO" behind my house a few weeks ago. Not sure what it was but it moved erratically and was pulsating a weird light. Then it shot up and disappeared.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Red
The truth is that, given the technology circa 1970, it would be harder to fake the moon landings than to go to the moon.
The main reason they had to fake it was proably space radiation.

MoonFaker: Radioactive Anomaly. PART 1.​



(23 parts)


The flaps are the front of a moving vehicle. Air flow would either push the flaps up or push them down, not keep them horizontal.
That's the silliest thing I've heard in a while. Sufficient pressure from walking would keep a paper from falling back down.


The rod and pole are moving, it's just harder to see because they are dark, and the movements are small.
I see zero movement of the rod and pole. Also, the movement of the flag would be caused by the movemnt of the rod and pole in your scenarion. The flag is obviously moving because it's hit by a wall of moving air. The movement does not originate from the rod.
 
If you run into somebody who thinks that the Earth is flat, have him or her watch one of these videos.
I took the cog train up to the summit of Pike'sPeak one fairly clear day, and could see the curve of the earth in the horizontal plane out over the plains.

Out on Utah's Salt Flats, there are some views from the I-80 freeway where, if the factors(surface heating layer) that reflect the sky are not prevalent, you can see an arc on the horizon to the north, between the Newfoundland Mountians and the lakeside hills on the west.

Sailors can sometimes see the same sort of thing with the horizons if the surface layer of the air is clear enough.
 
The flaps are the front of a moving vehicle. Air flow would either push the flaps up or push them down, not keep them horizontal.

Grab a sheet of paper, hold it in front of you with the front end unattached, and walk forward. Feel free to bounce up and down as much as you want. The paper will not stick out horizontally in front of you.


The rod and pole are moving, it's just harder to see because they are dark, and the movements are small.


That's what I said, vibrations from the guy moving would move the flag. Vibrations from the ground are more than sufficient.

The truth is that, given the technology circa 1970, it would be harder to fake the moon landings than to go to the moon.
The main reason they had to fake it was proably space radiation.

MoonFaker: Radioactive Anomaly. PART 1.​



(23 parts)



That's the silliest thing I've heard in a while. Sufficient pressure from walking would keep a paper from falling back down.



I see zero movement of the rod and pole. Also, the movement of the flag would be caused by the movemnt of the rod and pole in your scenarion. The flag is obviously moving because it's hit by a wall of moving air. The movement does not originate from the rod.

I have pursued a few of your links.

I think this deserves a lot more consideration. Thank you for bringing this in here.
 
This is a little vague. Air seems to be keeping the flaps from falling back down. It looks totally consistent with the atmosphere explanation. Please go into some more detail.


The only thing moving is the flag. If vibration were the explanation, the rod and pole would be moving and that movement would tranfer to the flag. The flag starts to move just before the astronaut gets close to it the way it would in air. Try it at home with a towel hanging from a ceiling light.


The Apollo Flag Air Compare

The Apollo Flag Moon Gag

Moon Mindset Madness


I think I used to do better creative writing when I was in Junior High (before Middle Schools became thename). But thanks for using this bit as a tease.
 
The flaps are the front of a moving vehicle. Air flow would either push the flaps up or push them down, not keep them horizontal.

Grab a sheet of paper, hold it in front of you with the front end unattached, and walk forward. Feel free to bounce up and down as much as you want. The paper will not stick out horizontally in front of you.


The rod and pole are moving, it's just harder to see because they are dark, and the movements are small.


That's what I said, vibrations from the guy moving would move the flag. Vibrations from the ground are more than sufficient.

The truth is that, given the technology circa 1970, it would be harder to fake the moon landings than to go to the moon.
I wonder what would be behind a name tag like "Cosmo Red". I think I saw something in my reading today in here about the Apollo hoax story being started in Russia, and about how we use the Russian vehicles for moving people to the space station rather than the Apollo stuff, because of course the Apollo stuff never really worked.

The project was always "The Space Race". We claim we won it, they say we faked it.

I have to examine this contest from the very beginning to the very end. I expect I will find that we used our media supremacy to win it least politically or propagandily.

We just have too damn many people defending our claim with lunacy. Incredible.

And you give me my prize exhibit on that score by claiming it was easier to do the moon than fake it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top