Holy piss, the Apollo moon missions were fake?!
- Thread starter TroutBum
- Start date
- Status
Archie Moses
Well-Known Member
Cosmored is big pimping everyone right about now.
We landed on the moon yet your responses. Lol
CR + 1
Archie Moses
Well-Known Member
Is there actually anything worth taking him off ignore to read? He's been an *** clown of the highest order as far as I've seen. I'm honestly disappointed that you're impressed by him and have felt the need to white knight his efforts here.
Archie Moses
Well-Known Member
No.
You haven't read my posts.
White knighting? What other cliches are you gonna throw at me?
This dude believes the moon landing was a hoax.
It wasn't.
Your arguments are futile. I'm not white knighting saying this.
Move on or cry harder.
You've been had.
I definitely haven't been had.
You started crying simply because I decided to point this poster out to Jason and have been acting like I came out with the pitchforks trying to ban him. You have misunderstood my actions and intentions despite me making like three ****ing posts trying to explain it in kindergarten terms to you.
You cheering him on and trolling in this thread is pathetic.
Archie Moses
Well-Known Member
I cried because I disagreed this guy should be banned because he posted about the moon landing being a hoax?
Mmmkay.
Archie Moses
Well-Known Member
Archie Moses
Well-Known Member
On a scale of 1 to 10, how pathetic am I? Lol
I'm certainly not cheering him on nor am I trolling.
I just don't think the dude should be banned for making claims that the moon landing was a hoax.
It wasn't. No need to tell Jason.
Ignore the guy or move on.
To me, it's been entertaining.
I'm not arguing for moon landing being a hoax for the 18th time it wasn't, I'm arguing for this being a GD forum, on a sports page, on the internet.
I'm so pathetic for having this option. Lol
I correct myself.
*we've been had. Lol
Darkwing Duck
Well-Known Member
Repeat a lie often enough and it becomes the truth.
(post #355)
jazzfanz.com
This lame stand of your totally exposes you as a shill*.
(2:07:26 time mark)
As I've said several times you'd have to examine what's it's like under the actual lid to be able to opine on what would happen. It's clear that something under the top of the lid impacts it to make it stop falling. The bottom of the lip doesn't make contact with the surface when it falls. We don't know how much space there is all along the front when the lid comes to a stop without having physically examining it. It might be as much as half an inch. This video of your assumes that there is little or no space along the front and that the force of the air coming out will be strong and even.
jazzfanz.com
You can't assume that's the case without being able to physically lift up the lid and examine what it's like under there. There might be something at the corner that narrows the space where the air escapes and therefore increases the pressure.
The bottom line is that the movement of the dust being sent away from the surface is consistent with air blowing it. If this were a vacuum, there wouldn't be a force that could move it that way.
Go ahead and rant all you want. It just makes you look like a horse's a-s and the viewers can see it. I don't see any point in my continuing to reiterate this.
*
www.clubconspiracy.com
Holy piss, the Apollo moon missions were fake?!
It's pretty clear that Dances With Clowns is Betamax from this forum. http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/the-chinese-spacewalk-was-faked.578673/#post-1072491802 He totally discredited himself by trying to obfuscate the clear proof that the Chinese spacewalk was faked in a water...
This lame stand of your totally exposes you as a shill*.
American Moon (English Version)
(2:07:26 time mark)
As I've said several times you'd have to examine what's it's like under the actual lid to be able to opine on what would happen. It's clear that something under the top of the lid impacts it to make it stop falling. The bottom of the lip doesn't make contact with the surface when it falls. We don't know how much space there is all along the front when the lid comes to a stop without having physically examining it. It might be as much as half an inch. This video of your assumes that there is little or no space along the front and that the force of the air coming out will be strong and even.
Holy piss, the Apollo moon missions were fake?!
It's pretty clear that Dances With Clowns is Betamax from this forum. http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/the-chinese-spacewalk-was-faked.578673/#post-1072491802 He totally discredited himself by trying to obfuscate the clear proof that the Chinese spacewalk was faked in a water...
You can't assume that's the case without being able to physically lift up the lid and examine what it's like under there. There might be something at the corner that narrows the space where the air escapes and therefore increases the pressure.
The bottom line is that the movement of the dust being sent away from the surface is consistent with air blowing it. If this were a vacuum, there wouldn't be a force that could move it that way.
Go ahead and rant all you want. It just makes you look like a horse's a-s and the viewers can see it. I don't see any point in my continuing to reiterate this.
*
Club Conspiracy Forums-Counter Intellegience Tricks and Techniques
Twenty-Five Ways To Suppress Truth: The Rules of Disinformation by H. Michael Sweeney sweenfam@teleport.com copyright (c) 1997 All rights reserved Per
www.clubconspiracy.com
Yeah, 100% love you too.
No.
I never said he should be banned. That's the whole ****ing point man! You're coming to his defense when all I did was say "hey Jason, this is a thing happening on your website." and you acted like I was gunning for a ban for this "poster." (he's a troll, btw. I wouldn't blame Jason for a second if he did ban him, but I'm 90% sure that's not what's going to happen and I'm 1,000,000% cool with that.)
Dances With Clowns
Member
The static is massively increased in a vacuum both in charge and frequency.
Static Electricity... in Space
When human explorers reach the Moon or Mars, they're going to have to watch out for something we've all experienced here on Earth: static electricity. Zap! It's annoying when you grab a door handle after rubbing your socks across the carpet. But the dry environments on the Moon and Mars could...
www.universetoday.com
I haven't read most of this because it's not an interesting debate. Quick glance shows @Cosmored is getting owned in every argument, but just posts a bunch more stupid links. I'm not sure what else you would expect fr someone arguing something that dumb though. I'm also almost positive that @Cosmored and @Dances With Clowns are the same person though.
Dances With Clowns
Member
Does it now, you crazy serial forum spammer who knows nothing about any of this. Your opinion is worthless.
I've shown you a screenshot of what it is actually like under the lid!! You are clearly trolling as usual.
IT'S FLAT!!
It's flat as can be seen by the picture! It's also irrelevant. You are lying or trolling or just too dumb to look at a simple picture. I showed you the design spec animation. It's flat!!
It makes no assumption at all and your ridiculous and proven inaccurate suggestion is irrelevant anyway. The falling lid sends the vast majority of air in direction of fall, it is basic physics. Any object acted on by a force etc.... The object is the air, the force is the falling lid.
It will be exactly as it is. The volume of air to be displaced is the rectangular size of the box above to the lid. Just guessing that looks about 4 cubic feet.
The picture shows the surface flat and even, the video of the design shows the surface flat and even and your claim is irrelevant ******** anyway. Four cubic feet of air is going straight ahead in a fraction of a second and we see a tiny puff to the corner (impact).
What a troll you are. The bottom line is that you are arm waving away clear and obvious irrefutable proof that the footage must be in a vacuum. All the "viewer" know this. In any medium, particularly vacuum and low gravity, any impact force on dust would be exaggerated.
Gotta laugh at this clown. He has no answer to his own stupid video actually proving the Moon landing with one tiny clip that he is too dumb to see or too scared to admit.
Now, troll - explain where 4 cubic feet of air went at significant speed (he actually pushed the lid shut AND you claim it was slowed down!) without any disturbance in the direction where the vast majority of it is sent!
Dances With Clowns
Member
How about you keep your unbelievably idiotic opinion to yourself. I actually find that quite insulting considering I actually despise the guy's behaviour.
Dances With Clowns
Member
- There is no terrestrial weathering on any of the samples.
- Basically the samples show no interaction with standing water, atmospheric water, atmospheric gases or any vegetation or animal.
- This is completely impossible to fake with an Earth rock.
- The samples are loaded with a whole host of solar isotopes so cannot possibly be from Earth, this leaves the other equally ignorant claim that they are meteorites.
- Now meteorites lose most of their mass on entry to Earth's atmosphere, so Apollo samples that show a slim layer of Helium-3 on their exteriors from shallow solar wind penetration could not possibly survive.
- The samples also show signs of micro-meteorite impacts on their outsides called zap-pits. Again stripped off from atmospheric entry.
- There is no heat damage to any sample from this entry process, zero terrestrial weathering from time spent on the surface and signs within the samples.
- Volcanic spherules that show formation in low gravity.
- In short, hundreds of geologists say they confirm they are from the Moon for many decades of study across multiple countries.
I anticipate no meaningful response to this because Cosmo know jack about any of this! The "viewers" are waiting Cosmo. They are awaiting your complete evasion, spam videos already addressed and ignored, and a ridiculous suggestion all the geologists from 50 years and multiple countries are all stupid or liars.
That would be your strength.
Hmm, that just furthers the proof. Both of you post from a time zone no where close to the usa as well.
His opinion is pretty reasonable since you followed CosmoRed here and are also a single thread poster essentially only responding to CosmoRed's posts. It's a way to get his posts noticed.
He is also a person who has been here for a long time and contributed a lot more than you have so maybe don't get outside yourself calling established posters here names?
- Status