Worldwide Genocide Continues: 13,867 DEAD from COVID-19 Shots
- Thread starter carey scurry fan
- Start date
carey-scurry fan
Banned
fact
/fakt/
Learn to pronounce
noun
a thing that is known or proved to be true.
"he ignores some historical and economic facts"
Known or proved, not known and proved.
What would you consider an authoritative source? Philosophers of science?
Find a experiment that could falsify 1 + 1 = 2. Even Popper made exceptions for the inability to falsify mathematical statements.
Again, you're allowing definitions to control your perception of reality, rather than the other way around.
The VAERS database you just linked to is funded by taxes on the pharmacological companies and run the government you claim is keeping things secret.
You have nothing but slander and disinformation, stacked up by trying to prey on people's ignorance. We're all onto the game here. You haven't uncovered some secret cabal, you're not part of the chosen. you've been manipulated into feeling an exaggerated sense of importance.
Go do something that really matters. Give money to a homeless person, tell someone you love them, teach a child something new. You can really be important doing these things. Spreading the lies of the quacks and charlatans of the world only diminishes you.
Al-O-Meter
Well-Known Member
The capacity for proving 1+1=2 as being true or false is contained in the Principia Mathematica proof.
Bertrand Russell & Alfred North Whitehead - Principia Mathematica 1+1=2
Bertrand Russell and Alfred North Whitehead were British mathematicians who were in the vanguard of the British revolt.
www.storyofmathematics.com
I'm going to need you to expand on that thought to understand what you are saying. Please give me an example of a thing that is known true but not proved true.
You just pushed it off a level. Can you find a falsification for the method of logic used in Principia Mathematica?
Anything that is proven true is not falsifiable.
For your example, I offer any scientific theory you can name. Known true, but only because it is the best explanation of the available evidence, and all are unproven.
Al-O-Meter
Well-Known Member
It is a 360 page proof. Are you asking me to prove the proof? I don't get what you are driving at.
Falsifiability describes the capability to use evidence to conclusively prove or disprove a thing. I think we've got a miscommunication over this word that isn't important to the broader point of what differentiates opinion from fact. Let's go back to opinion versus fact.
Scientific theories are not scientific fact. The best explanation of the available evidence is typically called the null hypothesis. It isn't called scientific fact. Being considered scientific fact is a very high bar. Even ideas with a truly massive amount of evidence in support with no evidence against, such as Einstein's Special and General Relativity, are still not considered fact by PhD physicists.
As I said above, to get this back on track I think we should concentrate on how to distinguish fact from opinion. To be absolutely clear I don't intend this as a slight toward you but I am shocked at how confused our culture has made opinions and facts. When I googled 'opinion vs fact' all of the top results were from colleges. I hadn't thought this was college level stuff. That said, if you research opinion versus fact I think it will be clear where moral values fall.
Last edited:
JazzyFresh
Banned
Just a friendly reminder now that even the WHO is saying the lab theory is just as credible as the animal that was never found and a worldwide virus just magically apeared .435 miles away from the lab theory...
"There is no question that there will be a challenge to the coming administration in the arena of infectious diseases,"
"the thing we're extraordinarily confident about is that we're going to see this in the next few years."
-Fauci
Funder of said research... The guy who literally hid information that it could be lab leaked from day one for whatever reason.
"There is no question that there will be a challenge to the coming administration in the arena of infectious diseases,"
"the thing we're extraordinarily confident about is that we're going to see this in the next few years."
-Fauci
Funder of said research... The guy who literally hid information that it could be lab leaked from day one for whatever reason.
Red
Well-Known Member
The Wuhan Lab and the Gain-of-Function Disagreement - FactCheck.org
A disagreement between Republican Sen. Rand Paul and Dr. Anthony Fauci has put $600,000 of U.S. grant money to the Wuhan Institute of Virology back into the spotlight, while making "gain-of-function" research a household term -- all amid calls for more investigation into the origins of SARS-CoV-2.
www.factcheck.org
I'm actually pretty familiar with the proof.
What I'm getting at is that all mathematical proofs are based on assumptions that are declared to be obviously, reasoned at by methods that are declared to obvious, but there is not evidence that these assumptions and methods are true.
More precisely, to whether everything that is not fact must therefore be an opinion, such as with th estatement you made, "Moral values are opinions. They cannot be falsified."
Fact is actually a very low bar in science. You see a piece of metal on a twisted wire move 1 degree, and that is a fact. The reading of 3.0 of a voltage meter is a fact. Facts are ordinary, everyday occurrences.
Theory and Fact | National Center for Science Education
One source of confusion about the status of the science or theory of evolution stems from the difference between the "everyday" meaning of the word "theory" and the scientific meaning the word.
I think it's pretty clear moral values are neither opinion nor fact. Part of your error is assuming opinion and fact form a partition over the class of all statements.
Al-O-Meter
Well-Known Member
Do you believe that moral values are never a matter of opinion?