What's new

Game Thread Nov 26, 2021 07:00PM MT: Jazz vs. Pelicans

Added to Calendar: 11-26-21

Not a slump. He's legit just lazy and playing entitled. He only cares the last 2 minutes of the game.

Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk

Haha your takes. Never Change Nateboz. Most negative poster of all the internets.

Yes it is a slump and he knows it. But I would take it now instead of the playoffs. And Don always starts slow. Every season. So this is nothing new. If you do your research, you too will see that he start slow first part of the year and turns it up the second part.
 
won't panic too much as we've had a similar start in 2019 season. but the best thing is for this management to do something now so we avoid the same fate comes playoffs
 
Man, I miss the D-Will era sometimes.

Sure they weren't as good as this team, and didn't win as much, but at least when those teams got into close games, you knew they were going to play smart and have a pretty solid chance to win.

When this team gets into close games I just assume we're going to lose. The passing stops, the off-ball movement dies, and we generate virtually zero good shots. This has been a years-long problem - there's no reason to believe it's going to get better. There's a reason the Jazz haven't won a single OT game since January 2018.

We won't get far in the playoffs if we play this poorly in these types of scenarios.
 
Man, I miss the D-Will era sometimes.

Sure they weren't as good as this team, and didn't win as much, but at least when those teams got into close games, you knew they were going to play smart and have a pretty solid chance to win.

When this team gets into close games I just assume we're going to lose. The passing stops, the off-ball movement dies, and we generate virtually zero good shots. This has been a years-long problem - there's no reason to believe it's going to get better. There's a reason the Jazz haven't won a single OT game since January 2018.

We won't get far in the playoffs if we play this poorly in these types of scenarios.

I'd trade prime Donovan for prime D-Will in a heartbeat.
 
Man, I miss the D-Will era sometimes.

Sure they weren't as good as this team, and didn't win as much, but at least when those teams got into close games, you knew they were going to play smart and have a pretty solid chance to win.

When this team gets into close games I just assume we're going to lose. The passing stops, the off-ball movement dies, and we generate virtually zero good shots. This has been a years-long problem - there's no reason to believe it's going to get better. There's a reason the Jazz haven't won a single OT game since January 2018.

We won't get far in the playoffs if we play this poorly in these types of scenarios.
Was it the team, or the coach?
 
It wasn’t, though. They called a phantom call where Donovan got continuation. Then they went to the film and had to face the fact that there wasn’t any foul at all. They can only review for when the foul happened and not whether it happened. They can’t change the call like they did, but they had to pretend that there was a foul on Gobert before the shot, when that was never the call on the floor.
I'm not really sure what you are trying to say, but there is no way that was continuation. They called a foul. They did review if it was continuation and it wasn't even close. Not even the biggest homer ever would have said it should have been continuation. Jazz deserved to lose this game.
 
How was that a foul on Pelicans? All the guy did was just run into the screen. That happens a hundred times a game. It was as if the refs wanted to give the jazz a break, and totally screwed it up.
I was referring to the continuation. I actually thought it was closer to an illegal screen than a defensive foul. They were reviewing continuation. Not the foul.
 
I'm not really sure what you are trying to say, but there is no way that was continuation. They called a foul. They did review if it was continuation and it wasn't even close. Not even the biggest homer ever would have said it should have been continuation. Jazz deserved to lose this game.
It was not continuation and it’s obvious. That’s my point. They ruled it as continuation. When they go to review, they can only review the timing of the sequence and not change the call on the floor. In this case they changed from the call on the floor (continuation) to Gobert being fouled before the shot.
 
It was not continuation and it’s obvious. That’s my point. They ruled it as continuation. When they go to review, they can only review the timing of the sequence and not change the call on the floor. In this case they changed from the call on the floor (continuation) to Gobert being fouled before the shot.
I think we are saying the same thing. I thought the official review was the right call. Not the call on the floor.
 
I think we are saying the same thing. I thought the official review was the right call. Not the call on the floor.
Yes, but my point is that they are not allowed to change that call. They can either say the foul was before the shot (they can’t because there wasn’t a foul) or they say it’s continuation (TJ yeah can’t because it wasn’t). The technical call is that the call on the floor stands. They can’t alter it. But they did because of they said their was continuation, it’s obvious waaaaaay wrong… and if they say it was before the shot…. well, yeah. So instead they changed it to a foul against Gobert (they can’t do that, but they did).
 
Yes, but my point is that they are not allowed to change that call. They can either say the foul was before the shot (they can’t because there wasn’t a foul) or they say it’s continuation (TJ yeah can’t because it wasn’t). The technical call is that the call on the floor stands. They can’t alter it. But they did because of they said their was continuation, it’s obvious waaaaaay wrong… and if they say it was before the shot…. well, yeah. So instead they changed it to a foul against Gobert (they can’t do that, but they did).
Sounds like that is protestable. Very rarely does the NBA make them redo from the spot but it has happened.
 
Top