So you're saying we need to get rid of Mitchell, since it was mostly Donovan who we should expect to do better on larger sample sizes? Since he's the playoff moneyball guy?It’s a good outcome for a moneyballer, because we don’t really need to do anything different because we just need to count on our shots to fall over larger samples. “Oh, well _____ was an anomaly and that’s not going to happen again.”
The most reassuring part is that anomalies don’t happen in the playoffs, only teh moneyballs.