I'm baffled why the local media continues to carry Quin's water. What has Quin done as a head coach overall that proves he's a really good head coach like Andy suggests? From my perspective, his success is pretty similar to what most GOOD or even marginally good head coaches experience in the NBA.
But it certainly hasn't proven VERY GOOD. Hell, even last year when it looked like maybe it was true, and Quin, after leading the Jazz to the best record in the NBA, might actually be a very good head coach, his team went out and collapsed against the Clippers.
But the facts are clear:
Quin has one of the worst playoff win percentages of any active coach who's coached in at least 40 playoff games.
Quin has overseen two of the biggest collapses in Jazz playoff history: blowing a 3-1 series lead vs Denver, despite leading by 15 points in the third quarter of a potential close-out game five. Then, a year later, blowing a 2-0 series lead against the Clippers in the second round and on top of that, blowing a 20+ lead in a must-win game six as they were eliminated.
A 3-12 all-time record in semifinal games.
I guess I just don't understand how you can claim a coach, who has yet to even get out of the second round, is very good.
To put everything into perspective, by the end of his eighth season with the Jazz, which Quin is in currently, Sloan had guided the Jazz to THREE WCF series.
In his ninth and tenth season, he was playing in the NBA Finals. Does anyone think Quin has this team remotely close to that level? Yeah, me either.
That's what I'd consider a very good coach. Quin is a decent regular season coach and a borderline bad playoff coach (boy I got ripped to shreds this time last year for saying I thought Quin was a mediocre playoff coach btw).