What's new
By:

Jazz Writers Twitter Space

Hearsky said:
The sense I got from their conversation and what I have always kind of assumed myself is that Rudy's cultural background, maturity and personality clashes with the NBA Gen Z personalities. It it beyond Rudy's thought process for someone like DM to just quit on a team. And, Rudy ain't about that **** not being called out. I mean, we have complete idiots like Lopoo trying to justify DM's quitting is acceptable. In the conversation last night, it was very clear they all agreed DM didn't put in the effort last year.
Click to expand...

You’re just making **** up at this point to deflect the blame from Rudy lmao.
 
Elizah Huge said:
There was a moment where they brought up Malik Beasley. Tony said he would likely start at SG, Andy then jumps in and says you don’t do that if you’re trying to lose. Sarah says she feels like Beasley is a little redundant with Clarkson on the team and Andy says Clarkson is the last person the Jazz should be trying to trade. Super weird sequence…
Click to expand...
Yeah, I didn't get that either. I think people are going to be happy with Beasly, if he sticks around. Dude can create his own shot and he shoots the three much better than Clarkson.
 
Elizah Huge said:
There was a moment where they brought up Malik Beasley. Tony said he would likely start at SG, Andy then jumps in and says you don’t do that if you’re trying to lose. Sarah says she feels like Beasley is a little redundant with Clarkson on the team and Andy says Clarkson is the last person the Jazz should be trying to trade. Super weird sequence…
Click to expand...

Clarkson seems like a kind of guy that is filling the Joe role. He’s being a company man and repping the ****** jerseys and making himself available. He seems to be the kind of guy that tries to get along with everyone. Not sure how accountability might come into play with a new coach, but he did understand his role under Quin and he did what he was told to do. He’s the kind of veteran that makes sense to keep.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Hearsky said:
Tell me what was wrong in the post. They clearly talked about him not giving full effort.
Click to expand...

I was mainly referring to:

It is beyond Rudy’s thought process for Mitchell to quit on the team?

For one Mitchell didn’t quit on the team for two to make an excuse for Rudy being a bad teammate by making something up about Mitchell is some wild ****.

Mitchell absolutely could have given more effort on defense anyone with eyes knows this and anyone who watched the Jazz know this. Tony specifically mentioned if Curry can do it Mitchell can do it.

Stop it with this he quit on the team bs and stop making excuses for Gobert.
 
Hope we don’t trade Clarkson unless it’s for something great. He has my vote for tank commander and would be a really useful piece if we are trying to stay quasi- competitive. He’s also just a good dude.

Clarkson and Beasley seem like pieces it may be nice to keep around til the deadline if the idea is to tank. Just let them flamethrow and build up trade value.
 
Elizah Huge said:
I was mainly referring to:

It is beyond Rudy’s thought process for Mitchell to quit on the team?

For one Mitchell didn’t quit on the team for two to make an excuse for Rudy being a bad teammate by making something up about Mitchell is some wild ****.

Mitchell absolutely could have given more effort on defense anyone with eyes knows this and anyone who watched the Jazz know this. Tony specifically mentioned if Curry can do it Mitchell can do it.

Stop it with this he quit on the team bs and stop making excuses for Gobert.
Click to expand...
How is "could have given more effort on defense" not quitting on the team? It fits my definition.
 
Hearsky said:
How is "could have given more effort on defense" not quitting on the team? It fits my definition.
Click to expand...

Basically the entire team outside of Rudy could have given more effort on defense so I guess the entire team quit huh?
 
infection said:
Yeah, but right now, way after the fact, they’re telling us about it. If they want to keep something under their hat, then fine, just avoid painting a picture that tries to convey the opposite.
Click to expand...

Good point. Maybe they were just drunk/high


Sent from my iPad using JazzFanz mobile app
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top