What's new
By:
Filters

Trade Rumors Involving the Jazz

Elizah Huge said:
With what? Why would Boston want our picks they’re in win-now mode.
Click to expand...
Would take more teams for sure. Just throwing it out there.
Who wants picks who has something good? Something like...

Celtics get KD
Jazz get Brown
Nets get SGA and Bojan
OKC gets Conley and a load of picks
 
Elizah Huge said:
With what? Why would Boston want our picks they’re in win-now mode.
Click to expand...
There’s no way that we could get Boston to engage in trade talks with us if we’re just offering picks.

But…..

What if there’s a 3rd, or even 4th team involved? Don’t get me wrong, it’s still not likely, but Utah does have a treasure trove of assets now. What if Brooklyn likes the idea of starting over from the ground up better than the idea of building around Jaylen Brown?? It wouldn’t be the craziest thing we’ve seen.

In all honesty, if you gave me the choice of robbing the Knicks blind and starting our rebuild with a **** ton of draft picks, or sliding Donovan over to PG and bringing Jaylen Brown in to play alongside him, that’s my choice.

Having 12ish first round picks certainly isn’t a bad thing, but it guarantees you nothing. You still have to hope the ping pong balls bounce in your favor, and even if they do, then you gotta hope you pick the right guy.
 
Jazzman12 said:
There’s no way that we could get Boston to engage in trade talks with us if we’re just offering picks.

But…..

What if there’s a 3rd, or even 4th team involved? Don’t get me wrong, it’s still not likely, but Utah does have a treasure trove of assets now. What if Brooklyn likes the idea of starting over from the ground up better than the idea of building around Jaylen Brown?? It wouldn’t be the craziest thing we’ve seen.

In all honesty, if you gave me the choice of robbing the Knicks blind and starting our rebuild with a **** ton of draft picks, or sliding Donovan over to PG and bringing Jaylen Brown in to play alongside him, that’s my choice.

Having 12ish first round picks certainly isn’t a bad thing, but it guarantees you nothing. You still have to hope the ping pong balls bounce in your favor, and even if they do, then you gotta hope you pick the right guy.
Click to expand...
Exactly!
 
Jazzman12 said:
There’s no way that we could get Boston to engage in trade talks with us if we’re just offering picks.

But…..

What if there’s a 3rd, or even 4th team involved? Don’t get me wrong, it’s still not likely, but Utah does have a treasure trove of assets now. What if Brooklyn likes the idea of starting over from the ground up better than the idea of building around Jaylen Brown?? It wouldn’t be the craziest thing we’ve seen.

In all honesty, if you gave me the choice of robbing the Knicks blind and starting our rebuild with a **** ton of draft picks, or sliding Donovan over to PG and bringing Jaylen Brown in to play alongside him, that’s my choice.

Having 12ish first round picks certainly isn’t a bad thing, but it guarantees you nothing. You still have to hope the ping pong balls bounce in your favor, and even if they do, then you gotta hope you pick the right guy.
Click to expand...

I understand the logic behind this for sure but Brooklyn has no incentive to start from the ground as they don’t own any of their future picks for awhile. They will look to be competitive.
 
idiot said:
So let me get this straight. It would be worse (in a tanking situation) for the Jazz to get the 2027 and 2029 FRP from the Lakers (perhaps unprotected) and the financial flexibility that an expiring Westbook would bring to the 2023-24 season than to get something like (the very plausible alternative situations of):

- a 2nd rounder and an expiring for Beverley
- a 2nd rounder and similar-sized contract expiring in 2024 for Beasley
-an expected late 2023 first (perhaps about pick 27) and a contract expiring in 2024 for Clarkson

OR

- a late 2023 first plus $14 million expiring contract in 2025 for Beverley
- a 2nd rounder and similar sized contract expiring in 2024 for Beasley
- no trade at all of Clarkson in 2022-23 (and then 2 second rounders for him in 2024 for 2025 expiring salary)

Is that your argument? And the reason is because we'd be helping the Lakers out too much by taking their two first rounders?

I'd get it if your argument is that we can get more for those three players than we can get from the Lakers (though I've indicated several times that I'm somewhat dubious about that argument). But my point is that it doesn't matter at all whether we are helping the Lakers out. I don't care what their situation is other than that their needs and our desires may align. What matters is that we help ourselves out as much as possible. Failing to deal with them if their offer is the best just because it helps them escape a sticky situation is GM malpractice.

PS, I do agree with you that there's no urgency. We should definitely shop around before doing something like this Laker idea. But it's an idea we have to keep in mind and weigh against what else the market is offering.
Click to expand...
I agree that facilitating a trade with the Lakers works great. All in. I think it's the right type of move to collect assets.

I don't think we need to move all 3 pieces for Westbrook. Price is steep because I think players like Clarkson, Beasley, Conley, Bogdonovic, Beverley, and even Vanderbilt all can fetch assets individually. Trading 3 for Westbrook is an overpay because I think we can do the same thing with any two of them so long as contracts line up. I think Bogdonovic and Conley is a plus for the Lakers and gets us to the same place. Or perhaps 2 of them plus Gay for salary purposes to get a little extra for ourselves. So, in short, yeah, I think we can get more for those 3 players.

Suppose we get the same trade you are suggesting but we don't toss in all 3 and we rid ourselves of Gay. Then we flip Beverley for a young player or another draft pick. Then we get 2 unprotected +.

In short, the Laker's are screwed right now with Westbrook. They have been trying to dump him for 6 months with no success. Beggars can't be choosers. No need to put a bow on the gift.
 
Elizah Huge said:
I understand the logic behind this for sure but Brooklyn has no incentive to start from the ground as they don’t own any of their future picks for awhile. They will look to be competitive.
Click to expand...
I think we would have to throw a good player (from another team using picks) at Brooklyn so they send KD to Boston.
 
Bodhi said:
All their chips still isnt enough chips.
Click to expand...
I think three unprotected firsts, three swaps, a protected or two, Herro (or what else he can be flipped for), and Jovic is just fine.

As or more importantly, it puts pressure on the Knicks.
 
If the Raptors aren't trading Barnes for KD, they will not trade Barnes for Mitchell. We should get good and comfortable with that fact.
 
TheStormofWar said:
If that's the package, honestly, I'm okay with that if the Knicks are being obstinate.
Click to expand...
Let’s just keep out the “protected or two” since that would mean the Heat trading more players and further complicating it. Let’s just keep it three unprotected 1sts, three swaps, Jovic, Strus, and Herro.

I think they offer that without much hesitation IF Boston landed KD.
 
NUMBERICA said:
I think three unprotected firsts, three swaps, a protected or two, Herro (or what else he can be flipped for), and Jovic is just fine.

As or more importantly, it puts pressure on the Knicks.
Click to expand...
My only hope there is that it just moves the Knicks.

I just dont know what we would do with Herro and why we would take him and pay him on this timeline. Im over DM but I would just as soon keep him than I would want to take on Herro and pay him, while also getting seemingly a bunch of late firsts.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Top