What's new

Trump's Coup Attempt

Dude was legitimately escorted in.
There has been tape of people being escorted in from day 1. That doesn't mean they were all escorted, or all peaceful.

You have such a simple mind, and use it to draw comfortable conclusions. These were a few violent people in the George Floyd protests, so the violence was important. There were a few violent people in the Jan. 6 insurrection, so the violence doesn't matter. It's blatant and obvious hypocrisy.
 
Hm... Why did your committee lie
Cheong is lying about media claims that Sicknick died on Jan. 6. Do those lies bother you?

What part is a lie exactly? Was the guy who is the face of the Insurrection not literally being escorted by police?
What does that mean, to you? It looks like complicity, to me.

I notice that nobody has addressed that the police literally escorted the main face of the insurrection into the Capitol. Are and of you going to address this. That the US government literally escort the leader of the Insurrection into the chambers?
@Bawse Dawg did address it, and you almost came to some sort of awareness when you asked if their complicity was important. Then you went back to being your usual naive self.

The US government... Escorted and even opened doors for the Buffalo guy into the chambers.
The Capitol police are not the entirety of the US government.

They don't deny the actual footage of him being completely healthy the day of. The guy that died of natural causes the next day...
You can't tell from camera footage if a man is healthy or not. What kind of ghoul are you for trying to score political points by misrepresenting a man's death? Is there no bar that is too low for you?

Why is Ray Epps so protected by the Democratic party?
He testified.

 
You can't tell from camera footage if a man is healthy or not. What kind of ghoul are you for trying to score political points by misrepresenting a man's death? Is there no bar that is too low for you?
Again, there is no bar too low for a dedicated troll. There has been nothing in the discourse with this, uh, person, that would indicate they are interested in anything beyond riling people up, by any means necessary. The very definition of trollery. Every time they are close to a salient point they veer strongly back to troll territory. If they were completely honest, as in if you ran into them in the mall and asked "what was all that about", I imagine you would get hemming and hawing that amounted to "I was just ****ing around, you guys all ate it up".
 
So according to the pathological liar the police were in on this as that's what Bawse Dog said... So why are these police not in jail or even looked at? That's a really stupid conspiracy. If the police were in on this like PL claims then they should be arrested and charged but they weren't. Again how stupid of a conspiracy. Literally if the police helped insurrectionists that would be a massive story.
 
Again, there is no bar too low for a dedicated troll. There has been nothing in the discourse with this, uh, person, that would indicate they are interested in anything beyond riling people up, by any means necessary. The very definition of trollery. Every time they are close to a salient point they veer strongly back to troll territory. If they were completely honest, as in if you ran into them in the mall and asked "what was all that about", I imagine you would get hemming and hawing that amounted to "I was just ****ing around, you guys all ate it up".
Have you ever added anything besides trolling me? No. You are the troll.

The point was that Democrats said he was murdered at the scene you incompetent trolls. That was the point being made that the committee and Democrats lied.
 
The FBI was fully aware of these threats dating back to November.

Government watchdog report finds FBI, Capitol Police identified but didn't share "credible threats" before Jan. 6​

Federal agencies responsible for protecting the U.S. Capitol did not "fully process" or share critical information — including about militia groups arming themselves ahead of the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection — a failure that stymied the response that day, according to a new 122-page report by the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office.

The FBI and the U.S. Capitol Police had seen "threats that were true or credible" days ahead of the assault on the Capitol building, the report said. But much as with the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, a failure by multiple agencies to share information and connect dots left those securing the Capitol unprepared for the onslaught.

"Some agencies did not fully process information or share it, preventing critical information from reaching key federal entities responsible for securing the National Capital Region against threats," the report said.

 
I think so. They were all responding to the call of their president. The president of their country. I would focus on the guy who instigated 1/6, built off the Big Lie. And maybe that will happen. But right now, we have an ex-president calling for retribution, for him and for his followers, after leading an effort to overturn election results and prevent a peaceful transfer of power.

And somehow this Banana Republic Hour is happening here, in our country. I would be less focused on people who believed the lie, and foolishly acted on it, and more on this evil clown….




Free article from the Washington Post, by Jennifer Rubin, that points out how the media is not really illustrating how unhinged this guy truly is. By not doing so, they normalize further a guy who tried to steal the 2020 election, and seeks retribution….


“Apparently, neither the media nor supposedly sober Republicans have learned anything from the past. Trump gave a bonkers speech at the Conservative Political Action Conference on Saturday, musing about Russia blowing up NATO headquarters, claiming President Biden had taken the border wall and “put it in a hiding area,” and telling the crowd, “I am your warrior. I am your justice. And for those who have been wronged and betrayed: I am your retribution”.

We do not get headlines acknowledging this is unhinged. Instead, we get from the New York Times: “Trump Says He Would Stay in 2024 Race if Indicted.” And a similar angle from CNN. ABC started its website report this way: “Former President Donald Trump continues to reign supreme over the conservative wing of the Republican Party.” From The Washington Post: “Trump takes victory lap at conservative conference.”

CBS intoned that Trump “aired grievances with his familiar foes: President Biden, the Department of Justice, and the litany of legal fights he is embroiled in.” Politico went with: “Trump ties a ribbon on the most MAGA CPAC yet.” Hmm.

From the coverage, you would never understand how incoherent he sounds, how far divorced his statements are from reality, and how entirely abnormal this all is.

This spectacle is equal parts infuriating and pathetic. Here are Republicans, some of whom are considering runs for the presidency, who somehow expect to get through a campaign without mentioning the single most disqualifying thing about the leader in the race (other than his mental unfitness): He betrayed the country. Such timidity is itself disqualifying for someone seeking the presidency. If these candidates cannot stand up to an ex-president who is currently devoid of power, how can we expect for them to defend the Constitution against enemies foreign and domestic?”
——————————————————————————-

“How entirely abnormal this all is”. Ya think so? With Bolsonaro in the CPAC audience no less, probably taking notes, lol.

Amazing! A banana republic version of the United States, trying to go mainstream. Tell me this is normal…

Yeah, that’s the guy I would focus on. The one doing a real good impression of a defeated leader of a banana republic, seeking to return to power, leading his followers in a drive for RETRIBUTION!! And those in power who helped him in that effort, more so than followers who were only doing what they felt their president was asking of them. Go after the liar who caused all this. The man trying so damn hard to destroy our country.

Otherwise, as Jennifer Rubin observes: “If you put cowering Republicans together with media unwilling to accurately describe what is going on in front of them, you wind up gaslighting voters, who come away with the impression that Trump’s carnival of crazy is acceptable. We know how this ends: If no one is willing to call out Trump for what he is, and the danger he poses to the United States, we risk returning him to the Oval Office.

Whereupon, expect the headlines: “How did this happen?”

Someone else who gets it.

“It is long past time to admit that support for Trump, after all that we now know, is a moral failing. As I wrote in a recent book, there is such a thing as being a bad citizen in a democracy, and we should cease the pretend arguments about policy—remember, the 2020 GOP convention didn’t even bother with a platform. Instead, anyone who cares about the health of American democracy, of any party or political belief, should say clearly that to applaud Trump’s fantasies and threats at CPAC is to show an utter lack of civic character. (I might say that it is no better than applauding David Duke, but why invoke the former KKK leader when Trump has already had dinner with Nick Fuentes, a white supremacist who he seems to think is a swell guy?)

The man who bellowed and sweated his way through almost two hours of authoritarian madness is still the same man who instigated an attack on our Capitol (and on his own vice president), the man who would hand our allies to Russia if they’re behind on the vig, the man who thinks a free press is his enemy, the man who tried to wave away a pandemic as thousands and thousands of Americans died.

Stigma and judgment have a place in politics. There was a time when we forced people out of public life for offenses far less than Donald Trump’s violent and seditious corruption. We were a better country for it, and returning to that better time starts with media outlets holding elected Republicans to account for Trump’s statements—but also with each of us refusing to accept rationalizations and equivocation from even our friends and family. I said in 2016 that the Trump campaign was a test of character, and that millions of us were failing it. The stakes are even clearer and steeper now; we cannot fail this test again.”


 
@One Brow
Someone else who gets it.

“It is long past time to admit that support for Trump, after all that we now know, is a moral failing. As I wrote in a recent book, there is such a thing as being a bad citizen in a democracy, and we should cease the pretend arguments about policy—remember, the 2020 GOP convention didn’t even bother with a platform. Instead, anyone who cares about the health of American democracy, of any party or political belief, should say clearly that to applaud Trump’s fantasies and threats at CPAC is to show an utter lack of civic character. (I might say that it is no better than applauding David Duke, but why invoke the former KKK leader when Trump has already had dinner with Nick Fuentes, a white supremacist who he seems to think is a swell guy?)

The man who bellowed and sweated his way through almost two hours of authoritarian madness is still the same man who instigated an attack on our Capitol (and on his own vice president), the man who would hand our allies to Russia if they’re behind on the vig, the man who thinks a free press is his enemy, the man who tried to wave away a pandemic as thousands and thousands of Americans died.

Stigma and judgment have a place in politics. There was a time when we forced people out of public life for offenses far less than Donald Trump’s violent and seditious corruption. We were a better country for it, and returning to that better time starts with media outlets holding elected Republicans to account for Trump’s statements—but also with each of us refusing to accept rationalizations and equivocation from even our friends and family. I said in 2016 that the Trump campaign was a test of character, and that millions of us were failing it. The stakes are even clearer and steeper now; we cannot fail this test again.”


You fell for another hoax... This was a setup. You are soo easy to manipulate it's embarrassing. Now run away like you always do after you lie. I can't believe anyone would fall for this but Milo the alt righty got Red lol. My god... Red aligning with the alt-right now just because of his obsession of Trump.

Milo Yiannopoulos claims he set up Fuentes dinner ‘to make Trump’s life miserable’​


As fallout from Donald Trump’s meeting with the white supremacist Nick Fuentes continues, a far-right activist has claimed the meeting was a set-up, meant to “make Trump’s life miserable”.
Republican leaders rebuke Trump over dinner with white supremacist
Read more

NBC News reported that in an attempt to “send a message” to the former president, Milo Yiannopoulos, a rightwing provocateur and former Breitbart editor, helped arrange for Fuentes to travel to Mar-a-Lago in Florida for a dinner between Trump and the rapper Ye, formerly known as Kanye West.

Trump dined with Fuentes and Ye at his resort on 22 November. Since the meeting, Trump has been criticized by senior Republicans and by conservative Jewish leaders.

Trump said Ye was invited to dinner and “unexpectedly showed up with three of his friends … whom I knew nothing about”. He has not condemned Fuentes and his views. Fuentes has been described by the chief executive of the Anti-Defamation League as “among the most prominent and unapologetic antisemites in the country”.


Truly embarrassing how easy Democrats fall for hoax's. Tell me more how you fell for another one @Red

Far-right activist Milo Yiannopoulos said he arranged the dinner between former President Donald Trump and white nationalist Nick Fuentes in order to make the former president’s “life miserable,” according to NBC News.

Yiannopoulos, who is reportedly advising rapper Kanye West, formally known as ‘Ye,’ told the outlet he was “the architect” behind the plan of having Fuentes travel with Ye so that he could infiltrate the dinner. Yiannopoulos told NBC News he “wanted to show Trump the kind of talent that he’s missing out on by allowing his terrible handlers to dictate who he can and can’t hang out with.”

 
Last edited:
You're so close...
Enlighten me please. You said the police were part of the insurrection, yet they are not in jail. For once answer something please other than "IDK".

"The cops are the bad guys too, in case you haven’t been keeping up. Not sure what kind of bombshell you’re attempting to drop here. But cops lending aid and support to the insurrection of the US Capitol is completely on brand."

So why are they not in jail? Why did the committee not address this? Please, i beg of you, any of you, just once answer a simple question. I will celebrate for weeks if you can.
 
Enlighten me please. You said the police were part of the insurrection, yet they are not in jail. For once answer something please other than "IDK".

"The cops are the bad guys too, in case you haven’t been keeping up. Not sure what kind of bombshell you’re attempting to drop here. But cops lending aid and support to the insurrection of the US Capitol is completely on brand."

So why are they not in jail? Why did the committee not address this? Please, i beg of you, any of you, just once answer a simple question. I will celebrate for weeks if you can.
Dude, a massive issue in our country is how much cops get away with and how hard it is to get them to face any consequences for their actions. You can talk all about the 'insurrectionist' protestors, but can't make the smallest of leaps to know what they were actually protesting? If I knew how to get more cops in jail I promise I'd let it be known.

Congrats, you've gotten a couple more posts of engagement from me, I'm sure it's a great morning for you.
 
Dude, a massive issue in our country is how much cops get away with and how hard it is to get them to face any consequences for their actions. You can talk all about the 'insurrectionist' protestors, but can't make the smallest of leaps to know what they were actually protesting? If I knew how to get more cops in jail I promise I'd let it be known.

Congrats, you've gotten a couple more posts of engagement from me, I'm sure it's a great morning for you.
So why aren't these cops in jail? Do you not think the left wing committee would address this? I mean, if the police were part of the insurrection as you claimed why did the committee not address this? This is pretty substantial stuff you are saying. Are you saying the committee is in on this too? That's exactly what it seems like you are saying. The committee hid this because it proves that this insurrection was allowed and coordinated by employees of the federal government. This destroys Democrats entire narrative and that is why they hid this from you by the kangaroo court, banana republic committee. This was staged... But I'm curious as why you suppose the committee hid this very very very important fact? Why did they and Democrats hide this footage if the federal police were involved? Why did republicans have to point this out? I'm all ears seeing how you and I are the only ones mature enough to actual discuss this while @Red pushes more of his alt-right bs.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top