Having Wemby as an asset for at least 7 years is better than 1-2 years of Luca to me. Plus we would lose not only Wemby, but also more players to match salaries and likely more picks.Would anyone trade Victor for Luka straight across?
Having Wemby as an asset for at least 7 years is better than 1-2 years of Luca to me. Plus we would lose not only Wemby, but also more players to match salaries and likely more picks.Would anyone trade Victor for Luka straight across?
Having Wemby as an asset for at least 7 years is better than 1-2 years of Luca to me. Plus we would lose not only Wemby, but also more players to match salaries and likely more picks.
3 + a PO, which he would probably opt out of for either a higher payday or to GTFO.Would actually be 4 years of luka.
Thanks for the correction. I read the wrong line on HoopsHype. I still don't think he would be worth Wemby, matching salary and the probable other picks we would have to give up. He is great on offense, but pretty poor defensively. He seems out of shape and doesn't appear to care to resolve that. I'd hate to give up so much, especially players on favorable rookie deals. I might be a bit biased though as I really just don't like him after watching him numerous times. Not necessarily his game, but him.Would actually be 4 years of luka.
This is so true. Why would I trade Wemby for a black hole that would cost me more players and salary?Having Wemby as an asset for at least 7 years is better than 1-2 years of Luca to me. Plus we would lose not only Wemby, but also more players to match salaries and likely more picks.
There is a decent chance that Wemby is not a star. There is also a decent chance that he is like Zion (star quality but can't stay on the court). Luka is a known MVP/Finals MVP tier player who hasn't even reached his peak.This is so true. Why would I trade Wemby for a black hole that would cost me more players and salary?
There is no way I give this much for Luka, no way. I don't care if Wemby is a star or not. I don't care about Luka at all. Why would I give them Walker and all those picks [and I think it would take 1-2 more players from Dallas' perspective] for a player while very good, is a killer for team dynamics. He is not a team player. He is a black hole that isn't worth getting and mortgaging the future for. I am not and will never be a Luka fan, nor do I ever want to see him in a Jazz uni. Just suicide if you go after him. He's never accomplished anything, but scoring. He doesn't get in shape. He has toxic relationships with his team mates. I'm sorry, you will never convince me that he is the answer.Realistically, I would be fine sending Dallas Rudy Gay and whatever combination of 7 players/picks they want (except for Lauri). IMO, Dallas would take 1) Walker, 2) 2023 Jazz FRP, 3) 2027 Cavs FRP, 4) 2027 Wolves FRP, 5) 2027 Lakers FRP, 6) 2029 Cavs FRP, 7) 2028 Jazz FRP (with Cav's pick swap).
Still would leave Jazz with: Luka, Lauri, Ochai, Sexton, Olynyk, Dunn, a few other scrubs, ~$30 million in cap space & 9 first round picks: 1) 2023 Wolves, 2) 2023 76ers, 3) 2024/25 Jazz, 4) 2025 Cavs, 5) 2025 Wolves, 6) 2026 Jazz (with Cavs or Wolves swap), 7) 2027 Jazz, 8) 2029 Jazz FRP, 9) 2029 Wolves (top 5 protected). If Ainge can't build a championship team with that then he should just retire.