That is like telling a professional baseball player that he doesn't understand baseball. I am a data engineer professionally. Looking deeper for trends and tendencies is what I get paid to do, and I do understand the value of it as I am compensated quite well.
That may very well be, that’s great, but you don’t seem to appreciate it where historical research is concerned. I’m not citing any deep research here, mine or anyone else’s, but simply pointing out it’s likely understanding that perspective will be helpful when looking at today’s world from the point of view of history.
Which is all I was getting out in pointing out the rise of conspiracism, alternate facts, and the irrational interpretation of current events(e.g. Pizzagate for one example) is concerned. As was pointed out, you left out all context, and simply complained about how many times you saw me use the word QAnon. And from out of the blue here, since the conversation did not involve it, but what came through was resentment, or maybe frustration, on your part, that it came up so often, in your view. I have not gone back to reread any of those comments in which I raised the subject. Chances are I’d likely still see the context the same. I wouldn’t raise the subject for no reason at all. Although I deduce you would, and did, consider it meaningless at the time.
I think you are a good dude, but you get so wrapped up in these wrong ideas that you become completely immune to even glaring evidence that you're on the wrong track.
I am at loss. Because, you also wrote this:
The exact same principle holds true for the topics you wrote about in the broader context of larger society. The responsible parties for putting those ideas into public view are those who claim to be against the things. Statistically speaking, the government and their allies in left-leaning media are the responsible parties. That isn't opinion. That is the story the evidence shows.
You make no sense to me at all. And, no surprise, your words show that we are seeing the history of recent years very differently. There may be historians, in the near term, or more distant future, on the right, who will write a history that you “find true”. We’ll see, but as for this, I don’t agree at all.