homeytennis
Well-Known Member
If we trade for Ben Simmons can he win rookie of the year again?
It’s the will he won’t he distraction that I think just kinda hangs out there. Collins isn’t nearly as negative as you are making him here.I think Cam would be 2+ plus picks in addition to John Collins. Cam Johnson always been somewhat of a numbers darling, might be worth it to pay that. Hot take, but he's a better value proposition than Bridges.
Collins deal is longer and he hasn't exactly been helping us win. Getting the money off the books one year early is important. BS basically doesn't exist anymore. There are no headlines or distractions. If announcing he will be reevaluated every two weeks is a problem, you got a lot of problems.
It’s the will he won’t he distraction that I think just kinda hangs out there. Collins isn’t nearly as negative as you are making him here.
Adding two picks to Collins for Johnson would be wild. His on/off isn’t amazing and his normal box score stuff is nice but similar enough to Collins. Remember when the in/off stuff made Rudy Gay look like he was helping… it’s really a Walker Kessler thing. Johnson would be better with Walker of course but I’m not willing to throw two picks at it for that reason.
Just be patient… give Collins more sample of productive play and see what his value is in the offseason… assuming he’s this negative. No need to sell this low… he’s not toxic.
Not sure someone is giving two good firsts plus expiring salary for Johnson. If it costs a first to offload Collins the solution is simple... just hold. No need to force fetch to happen here. Look for value not just to swap stuff out at fair prices. Cam vs. Collins doesn't change what the next 2-3 years look like substantially. Why pay 2+ picks for that privilege? Do we go from a lower tiered play in team to an upper tier play in team? Then no thanks. Simone/Tay Henny can try to assume the role Johnson would have and we can bench Collins if we really need to (we don't need to though).If you're moving Collins, I think that's minus one FRP easily. I don't think he's the worst player in the world, but that contract is terrible. Cam Johnson alone could yield 2 FRP of value. He's a really good player on a long term deal. Depending on the quality of those picks, 2+ sounds right to me. I don't see how 1 FRP is close.
Agree. Collins is here as a mid-level player that helps us to meet the salary minimum and has worth as salary to make a larger deal happen without gutting the team. He‘s our more expensive Patrick Beverly.Don't give up picks for players that don't clearly move the needle. If Collins is really killing us this much reduce his minutes. If you want to give up multiple picks for Cam Johnson... just go ahead and play Simone more. Live with the budget version of guys that don't move the needle and be patient.
I disagree with the salary part of the equation and have outlined why its not the answer. I think they liked John the player and thought his value would increase. It may be decreasing but not significantly.Agree. Collins is here as a mid-level player that helps us to meet the salary minimum and has worth as salary to make a larger deal happen without gutting the team. He‘s our more expensive Patrick Beverly.
Not sure someone is giving two good firsts plus expiring salary for Johnson. If it costs a first to offload Collins the solution is simple... just hold. No need to force fetch to happen here. Look for value not just to swap stuff out at fair prices. Cam vs. Collins doesn't change what the next 2-3 years look like substantially. Why pay 2+ picks for that privilege? Do we go from a lower tiered play in team to an upper tier play in team? Then no thanks. Simone/Tay Henny can try to assume the role Johnson would have and we can bench Collins if we really need to (we don't need to though).
Well pick quality matters. Royce was traded for a first that was the worst of 2-3 picks scenario with some great teams in there. It was virtually guaranteed to be a late first. An unprotected pick or lightly protected pick like the Lakers pick is easily worth like 2-3 of those protected picks imo. If we are talking unprotected picks there is no way I'm doing that for Cam. I would settle for budget version Cam with Tech. Hell Tech on his next deal might be worth more than Cam. If we are talking the worst of 3 picks we own type of language I'll talk but Nets are doing that.I think Cam is easily a 2FRP kind of guy. He's certainly not a 1 FRP guy, no way. Royce O'Neale is a 1 FRP guy. I do think Cam vs Collins changes the Jazz franchise in a big way. Cam is a much better player and a much better fit. Are we going to find a better use of those picks than Cam Johnson? That is the real question, because there's no guarantee those 2 picks change the franchise substantially either. You're going to need players of Cam Johnson's quality at some point, they won't fall into your lap. It's not like we're burning down the house to get Cam Johnson. We'd be getting rid of a clearly problematic contract on our end while also getting a very good player who is tied down for a long time. I would feel very good about Cam maintaining his value as he enters the prime of his career.
It's ok if you want to say no, but what are you actually going to say yes to? Cam Johnson would be an extremely valuable get for this team. I doubt BKN would even accept this kind of deal. Even with their stable of wings, these are the most highly valued archetypes.
Its a Walker Kessler thing. I think he can play more minutes and might help us win more but sometimes things don't work out over a bigger sample like that. Remember when Rudy Gay looked awesome based on advanced stats... he sucked... it was because he played with Walker.The more I dig into on/off stats the worse Collins looks. Opponents are scoring +10.3 more points per 100/possessions with Collins on the floor which is worst in the entire league.
Compared to Kessler where opponents are scoring -10.0 less points per/100 possessions which is 3rd best in the entire league.