What's new

What are your "we'd have a ring IF" beliefs?

infection

Well-Known Member
Staff member
2018 Award Winner
2019 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
What beliefs do you hold where had some realistic thing transpired that you believe would have led to a title? This has to be within the realm of possibility and something that was legitimately on the table. For instance, you can't say drafting Jokic instead of trading back for Bolomboy. It also has to have some level of proximity, so you can't just say not sign Gail Goodrich and have Magic Johnson, or you couldn't just say keep Dominique as he was traded 15 years before we made our first finals. I'd also like to avoid things that are outside the hands of the franchise and its players (i.e. not "if they called Jordan's push-off" or "if they didn't waive off Eisley's 3"). The rules on this are that you have to give your first unbiased take, meaning you can't read through the responses first. You can certainly give updated takes after reading but the idea is to capture the first things that come to your mind. I will list mine in spoilers. You don't have to put yours in spoilers, but the idea is to respond to the question first before reading others' responses but you're welcome to then add other discussion after reading.

My tops are as follows:

1. The Rony Seikaly trade goes through. This one still chaps my ***.

2. Gordon Hayward stays. If we were on enough of an upswing and then had Mitchell come through, perhaps that accelerates a timeline and we still have draft assets to move things along faster rather than "keeping the powder dry."

3. Kirilenko kept his motivation during our WCF run. If he had enjoyed basketball at that point like he did before, in terms of hustling and doing dirty work. It's a bit of a tall order as we were 1-4 against San Antonio, but that series was really the championship series.
 
Ike Austin... can't remember all the circumstances but if we had Ike Austin we win the title.

Close second... Rony Seikly. Eff that guy.

Gordon Hayward doesn't go to Boston is 3rd. He doesn't mash his ankle... we have prime Gordo, Don, Rudy, Ricky, Joe and DL also gets a good backup center at the minimum. We use picks to trade for Derrick White instead of offloading bad centers.
 
Also my AK/Dwill/Boozer/Okur era what if would be "What if we fired Sloan and hired a better modern coach".

Like a coach who would have been more ahead of the 3 ball movement when we had Okur and Korver.... Even CJ Miles was wasted to an extent when he ended up being a really good career 3pt shooter.
 
What beliefs do you hold where had some realistic thing transpired that you believe would have led to a title? This has to be within the realm of possibility and something that was legitimately on the table. For instance, you can't say drafting Jokic instead of trading back for Bolomboy. It also has to have some level of proximity, so you can't just say not sign Gail Goodrich and have Magic Johnson, or you couldn't just say keep Dominique as he was traded 15 years before we made our first finals. I'd also like to avoid things that are outside the hands of the franchise and its players (i.e. not "if they called Jordan's push-off" or "if they didn't waive off Eisley's 3"). The rules on this are that you have to give your first unbiased take, meaning you can't read through the responses first. You can certainly give updated takes after reading but the idea is to capture the first things that come to your mind. I will list mine in spoilers. You don't have to put yours in spoilers, but the idea is to respond to the question first before reading others' responses but you're welcome to then add other discussion after reading.

My tops are as follows:

1. The Rony Seikaly trade goes through. This one still chaps my ***.

2. Gordon Hayward stays. If we were on enough of an upswing and then had Mitchell come through, perhaps that accelerates a timeline and we still have draft assets to move things along faster rather than "keeping the powder dry."

3. Kirilenko kept his motivation during our WCF run. If he had enjoyed basketball at that point like he did before, in terms of hustling and doing dirty work. It's a bit of a tall order as we were 1-4 against San Antonio, but that series was really the championship series.
2 outta 3 are shared.
 
I won't talk about the more obvious ones like everything from game 6 '98. Here are some other slight changes from the past that I think could've changed our trajectory maybe leading the way to a title:

-Lakers never trade for Pau
-CP3 over Deron
-Refs call basket interference on Pippen (game 6 '97)
-Drafting Bane (already mentioned)
-Jazz win game 5 against Rockets (1995)
 
I'd say the biggest is when we were looking to draft a rim protector in 2007 draft to address our biggest weakness on the team that is paint security.

Then we got a shot blocking big man from Europe named Fesenko when Marc Gasol was still available despite having a much better resume at the time.

The single biggest "what if" moment in our franchise history. One can argue Lakers wouldn't have knocked us out 3 seasons in a row without Pau Gasol. And they wouldn't have gotten Pau in the first place if they didn't have Marc, who Memphis admired for a long time(he even played high school ball in Memphis). Not to mention how scary our roster would have looked with Dwill/AK/Boozer/Marc. It's truly a complete team that could have remained in contention for many more years to come.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top