jom2003
Well-Known Member
Brogdon is basically the second coming of George Hill. Good player but not good enough to move the needle. Also made of glass and guaranteed to miss games when we needed him the most in the playoffs just like what Hill/Ricky/Mike have done. We surely overpaid go get Conley but he wasn't the biggest problem.Bring in Brogdon instead of Conley. I like Conley but he was not what we needed. At all. Tiny non-defensive-minded back courts rarely win anything of note. Regular season champs, playoff failures. Add a player like Brogdon instead and things would have been very different.
To me the Bogey signing was even more problematic because he was the single biggest swing factor for us having to shift our identity from defense to offense.
Toronto literally showed us a year prior that you can win a chip with a small backcourt if you have elite wings with size/athleticism to cover your grounds. Then signing Bogey who can't really rebound or defend after acquiring a small backcourt was really a move that rubbed salt to our wound. It was a defense crippling move that got us and Rudy exposed in the playoffs over and over again. Bogey is a good player and probably still a fan favorite here in Utah. But he really wasn't the right signing for us at that time.
Last edited: