What's new

Off-Season Rumblings

People are getting super annoying though. If the rumor is we’re interested in anyone who’s not a top-10 player they have a breakdown.
It’s only annoying because your opinion differs. There are super annoying people on both sides of this debate. I do think Tankers have a tone to their complaints that is more grating.

It’s fair for everyone to be critical of the plan because there is no plan.
 
It’s only annoying because your opinion differs. There are super annoying people on both sides of this debate. I do think Tankers have a tone to their complaints that is more grating.

It’s fair for everyone to be critical of the plan because there is no plan.
No, it’s super annoying regardless. I’m on record to be fine with any route we go. I trust the front office. People who act like Danny is going to be fine putting a mid team together or blowing his assets on a non-star are wasting their breath and energy.
 
Are the 6-7 extra wins that take you from 25 to 32 so amazing you want to reduce your chances of top 4 pick by 50% and also pick 3-5 spots lower than you could have. The draft slot difference alone is worth at least another first in most drafts if you move back. I get that Detroit exists… so does SA and OKC.
So does Atlanta?

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
Clarkson and picks?
Basically anyone besides Lauri, sexton, key and Hendricks plus 2 picks.
Probably not enough but that is what I would offer

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
1. You can’t bring hind sight into this.

2. We won I believe 5 games after the deadline moves were made. All we needed to do was make those trades before the season, play the rookies and some GLeague’ers

So what did the deadline deals tell you? Lol
I'm not using hindsight. I literally said 4 years from now. 4 years from now is the opposite of hindsight.
Me saying there is no way to know is the opposite of hindsight.

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
I only hate tank talk because we know it's not happening. And since we're not tanking, every single discussion turns into "I'd rather tank instead". OK cool, we get it. Be real bad, draft real good player, be good team....yada yada yada. It's an irrelevant topic because it won't happen. I wish there could be one thread for all complaining about "we should tank" instead of every single thread devolving into this.
 
As far as draft night trades it would be great to see a scenario where the Jazz use WK and Cle ‘25 to move up and grab Castle. Use 10 for Tidjane and then can combine 39 and 32 and send them to Phoenix for 22 or something similar and get Edey if he he doesn’t move up to far.


Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz
 
So does Atlanta?

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
Exactly... and Memphis and many other teams. Just like tankers shouldn't bring up SA (2x) as the case for tanking... not sure anti-tankers should bring up Detroit every time.
 
If they were forced to be as much of the offense as Clarkson, sure. But they wouldn't not have. So shots would have gone to much better players. Clarkson was a huge negative last year.
Yeah maybe. I just think even a ****** vet having a bad year is so much more competent but if the case is he held back Sexton (key was bad) then maybe. I don't think that was DA's design of course.
 
Back
Top