What's new
By:

Donald is about to go through some things...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 365
  • Start date Start date
It's pretty cut in stone... There's obvious reasons why him and fish ran away and wouldn't answer a simple question. I just wish y'all would've complained when the Judge donated to political opponents opponents like the Judge did in NY. Who's daughter literally worked for Biden. Who 2 different AGs refused to press charges, same as the FEC , and it only happened the moment Biden sent his third in command at the DoJ to arrest him.

You all really care...(Sarcasm you don't give a s*)
 
SteakNEggs said:
It's pretty cut in stone... There's obvious reasons why him and fish ran away and wouldn't answer a simple question. I just wish y'all would've complained when the Judge donated to political opponents opponents like the Judge did in NY. Who's daughter literally worked for Biden. Who 2 different AGs refused to press charges, same as the FEC , and it only happened the moment Biden sent his third in command at the DoJ to arrest him.

You all really care...(Sarcasm you don't give a s*)
Click to expand...
What the **** are you talking about? I answered, it, gave the constitutional reason and one of the SCOTUS cases going over it. If you can't read homie, that's on you.
 
TheStormofWar said:
You can do it. Quote for me the shooter's political party.
Click to expand...
I'm not going to answer your questions when you don't have any respect to answer my true or false question. Well... I'm guessing a Trump supporter wouldn't assassinate Trump. Are people really this stupid? Fish claims to be partially Republicans and he's the most Alt-Left person I know. He was liking post just the other day where the conversation was about assassinating Trump. Ask him about it.
 
TheStormofWar said:
So it's your contention the Trump administration's appointments Mueller and Durham, as well as every Independent Counsel since 1875, requires the appointment by Congress
Click to expand...
'Independent Counsel', no. Independent Prosecutor, yes. Mueller could lead an investigation but had to hand off any prosecutions to the DOJ due to being an "inferior officer".

The panel agreed with the government that Mueller's appointment by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein complied with the Constitution's appointment clause, which allows a department head to appoint an inferior officer, who is then supervised and directed by a presidentially appointed and Senate-confirmed officer.
Click to expand...

When the Biden DOJ kept going on about how independent the investigation was, how the Biden DOJ wasn't putting their hands on the scale to prosecute a political opponent, it meant that Jack Smith wasn't an inferior officer being supervised and directed. It was an independent office carrying out the prosecution, and independent offices need to be created by Congress as per the US Constitution.
 
SteakNEggs said:
I'm not going to answer your questions when you don't have any respect to answer my true or false question. Well... I'm guessing a Trump supporter wouldn't assassinate Trump. Are people really this stupid? Fish claims to be partially Republicans and he's the most Alt-Left person I know. He was liking post just the other day where the conversation was about assassinating Trump.
Click to expand...
Come on, I believe in you! Quote me that shooter's registered political affiliation.
 
TheStormofWar said:
What the **** are you talking about? I answered, it, gave the constitutional reason and one of the SCOTUS cases going over it. If you can't read homie, that's on you.
Click to expand...
Dude you're feeding the troll. He'll never provide anything remotely relevant. He just wants to get a rise out of you. As long as you engage in this back and forth he'll sit there rubbing his chubby. He gets off on it. Just stop feeding the troll.
 
TheStormofWar said:
So it's your contention the Trump administration's appointments Mueller and Durham, as well as every Independent Counsel since 1875, requires the appointment by Congress, despite the fact it is not Congress's purview to enforce the laws of our nation and every related SCOTUS case said they were good on this concept. Do I have your bat*** logic correct?
Click to expand...
I want to be clear... If Trump wins you are ok with him appointing a Jack Smith of his own and arresting every one of his political opponents?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top