FBI Is Not Fully Convinced Trump Was Struck by a Bullet
FBI Director Christopher Wray revealed during a marathon testimony on Wednesday that investigators still do not know if former President Donald Trump was grazed by a bullet or a piece of shrapnel during his attempted assassination.Twice during the hours-long session, Wray told lawmakers that the...www.yahoo.com
View: https://x.com/RpsAgainstTrump/status/1816274358761095670
FBI Is Not Fully Convinced Trump Was Struck by a Bullet
FBI Director Christopher Wray revealed during a marathon testimony on Wednesday that investigators still do not know if former President Donald Trump was grazed by a bullet or a piece of shrapnel during his attempted assassination.Twice during the hours-long session, Wray told lawmakers that the...
View: https://x.com/RpsAgainstTrump/status/1816274358761095670
It doesn't ****ing matter. Why are you arguing against it?Sure. Why wouldn't the FBI not know. It is not like a NY Times photographer caught an image of the bullet in flight. Oh, wait....
*cough*troll*cough*
The image could be either, but it definitely doesn't matter. Unless you're a Trump fan who thinks the very conservative FBI is out to get him and this changes everything for some crazy conspiracy we're about to hear about for pages on end.
Sure. Why wouldn't the FBI not know. It is not like a NY Times photographer caught an image of the bullet in flight. Oh, wait....
Bullet versus shrapnel doesn't matter to the situation. The FBI maintaining an image of competence and trust absolutely does matter. When the director makes a public statement in the face of conclusive evidence already in the public domain, especially when it doesn't alter the situation, that is not a good thing.
You just nailed it for why it matters to some posters.
Could mean that conclusive evidence already in the public domain isn't conclusive or evidence. Could be fake. I mean it's from mainstream media so.........
Given statements like the one Wray made, I can't fault you, but I can hope for better.
