What's new

The Biden Administration and All Things Politics

I did not realize you covered this in a different thread before posting the previous comment.
They are taking this quote out of context, just like “very fine people”, “drink bleach”, “stick a flashlight up your ***”. They are doing it again to fit their narrative.

I don’t have to take Kamalas quotes out of context to fit the narrative that she lacks depth on basic topics.

Here is the Border Czar herself being asked about working with the GOP on the border…another 7th grade response with 0 depth.


View: https://x.com/truthorconseq12/status/1817311187614490720?s=46&t=BMMZjW7vq0_zwnmLDjNTgQ


Every poster on this forum would have an answer with more substance than her and none of us are politicians or experts or Border Czars.
 
The immigration issue is crazy because a lot of the stats say the Democrat president has been way harder on immigration than the Republicans.
 
The immigration issue is crazy because a lot of the stats say the Democrat president has been way harder on immigration than the Republicans.
He's got a point... Obama deported more illegals than any other president in our history. Like his bloodthirsty voters he hated Mexicans and especially Christian ones with a passion. Sadly hypocrites like CY only care about that when Trump does it.
 
Last edited:
They are taking this quote out of context, just like “very fine people”, “drink bleach”, “stick a flashlight up your ***”. They are doing it again to fit their narrative.

I don’t have to take Kamalas quotes out of context to fit the narrative that she lacks depth on basic topics.

Here is the Border Czar herself being asked about working with the GOP on the border…another 7th grade response with 0 depth.


View: https://x.com/truthorconseq12/status/1817311187614490720?s=46&t=BMMZjW7vq0_zwnmLDjNTgQ


Every poster on this forum would have an answer with more substance than her and none of us are politicians or experts or Border Czars.
Again, you say she lacks depth on basic concepts.
Meanwhile if you take trumps whole quote in total context then you have to realize just how badly he lacks depth on basic concepts. Like voting and elections. He is saying he will make elections so safe and fair and perfect that he won't need the Christian vote.

You realize how stupid that is right? (I provided the numbers in the other thread but saw no response)

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
I thought this was interesting; I think this is great progress and know
Again, you say she lacks depth on basic concepts.
She does and I have provided multiple instances that, which are in context. (Not hard to do)

Yet, when I post them, the argument is quickly changed to “But Trump”. I’m not fighting for Trump.

I’m just posting that another one of his quotes are taken out of context and used to say “That he will turn into Putin/Kim dictatorship and there won’t be any more elections in the USA”

You called me out on this:
“Does that mean that trump is going to "fix" elections to where voting doesn't matter and if so, you cool with that plan @“

His quote was taken out of context. I provided the evidence.

Yet, the argument changes to Trump he lacks depth on basic concepts. I wasn’t arguing that. At all.

You called me out on the switch:
“But you think trump knows more about topics when discussing them. Its crazy that you haven't yet realized he is an idiot who rarely knows what he is talking about”

Meanwhile if you take trumps whole quote in total context then you have to realize just how badly he lacks depth on basic concepts. Like voting and elections. He is saying he will make elections so safe and fair and perfect that he won't need the Christian vote.
Elon, literally posted almost the same thing I did, in more words, 9 hours later.

View: https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1817349944443040004


If you consider this lacks depth, then yes he is lacking depth.
 
I thought this was interesting; I think this is great progress and know

She does and I have provided multiple instances that, which are in context. (Not hard to do)

Yet, when I post them, the argument is quickly changed to “But Trump”. I’m not fighting for Trump.

I’m just posting that another one of his quotes are taken out of context and used to say “That he will turn into Putin/Kim dictatorship and there won’t be any more elections in the USA”

You called me out on this:
“Does that mean that trump is going to "fix" elections to where voting doesn't matter and if so, you cool with that plan @“

His quote was taken out of context. I provided the evidence.

Yet, the argument changes to Trump he lacks depth on basic concepts. I wasn’t arguing that. At all.

You called me out on the switch:
“But you think trump knows more about topics when discussing them. Its crazy that you haven't yet realized he is an idiot who rarely knows what he is talking about”


Elon, literally posted almost the same thing I did, in more words, 9 hours later.

View: https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1817349944443040004


If you consider this lacks depth, then yes he is lacking depth.

Yes he lacks depth because the voter fraud is an invention that anyone that looks into it would realize.

So Trump heard people say "voter fraud" it was good for him, so he is now pushing very strongly this false idea that there is wide spread voter fraud that changes the outcome of the presidential election to the tune of tens of millions of votes.

Him thinking that he'll fix voter fraud demonstrates one of two things, possibly both. First, that Trump is dumb enough, having access to all the pertinent information, to believe voter fraud is a serious problem. Second, that he is simply using non-existent voter fraud to scare his base.
 
The arguments that Kamala just isn't good enough don't vibe with me.

I feel like I got on a plane with a coach middle seat between two women with lap riding infants that never stop crying and I got upgraded to Comfort+ and people are trying to tell me how ****** my seat is compared to first class.

Yeah, I know better seats exist, but this seat compared to the hell I thought I was condemned to is a welcomed and cherished improvement.
 
I thought this was interesting; I think this is great progress and know

She does and I have provided multiple instances that, which are in context. (Not hard to do)

Yet, when I post them, the argument is quickly changed to “But Trump”. I’m not fighting for Trump.

I’m just posting that another one of his quotes are taken out of context and used to say “That he will turn into Putin/Kim dictatorship and there won’t be any more elections in the USA”

You called me out on this:
“Does that mean that trump is going to "fix" elections to where voting doesn't matter and if so, you cool with that plan @“

His quote was taken out of context. I provided the evidence.

Yet, the argument changes to Trump he lacks depth on basic concepts. I wasn’t arguing that. At all.

You called me out on the switch:
“But you think trump knows more about topics when discussing them. Its crazy that you haven't yet realized he is an idiot who rarely knows what he is talking about”


Elon, literally posted almost the same thing I did, in more words, 9 hours later.

View: https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1817349944443040004


If you consider this lacks depth, then yes he is lacking depth.
Quick easy question. Do you agree with trump that after he fixes the election he (and other Republicans) won't need the Christian vote?

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
The arguments that Kamala just isn't good enough don't vibe with me.

I feel like I got on a plane with a coach middle seat between two women with lap riding infants that never stop crying and I got upgraded to Comfort+ and people are trying to tell me how ****** my seat is compared to first class.

Yeah, I know better seats exist, but this seat compared to the hell I thought I was condemned to is a welcomed and cherished improvement.

Great analogy. I'd like to add that those people talking **** about your Comfort+ seat are on a Boeing about to plunge into the ocean.
 
Back
Top