What's new
By:

Kamala Harris for Pres

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 365
  • Start date Start date
The Thriller said:
I highly encourage posters to watch the Obama’s last night. These were outstanding speeches that I think can convince undecided folks to vote for Kamala. It’s amazing to listen to leaders speak about America in a positive way instead of always talking about how failed or crappy it is.


View: https://youtu.be/l2K9lFom-6E?feature=shared



View: https://youtu.be/Z0xDPi7WPOs?feature=shared


Take a listen while you’re doing dishes or folding laundry tonight.
Click to expand...


IMG_6678.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
The Midnight said:
I’m surprised no poll or study had been conducted in this.

Maybe cos nobody wanted to go near the Church?

I mean why would Christians be so fixated in the abortion issue and overlook everything else Trump say and does?
Click to expand...
Because killing babies is very bad. Mean words, not so much. Was that simple enough for you?
 
The hype around Kamala was never real. She always sucked and nobody likes her. Her popularity is yet another conspiracy that the left fell for.
Even with all the election interference, the tech bias, the lawfare, kicking RFK jr. West, and everyone else off the ballot, the illegal immigrant votes, and with the media carrying her water, she won’t win. That’s how bad she is. Probably the worst candidate in history.


View: https://x.com/polymarket/status/1831338849550667895?s=46&t=PfGBft52CF1a98VsjZzilw
 
Mongoose said:
Here’s some more conspiracy for you. The democrats are interfering in elections. Maybe Cornel will join MAGA? Just kidding he practically is a stooge for Democrats, funny they got him off the ballot, but I guess you can’t risk votes going to anyone besides Kamala.

Shameful racist democrats.


View: https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1827580637307449389?s=46&t=PfGBft52CF1a98VsjZzilw
Click to expand...

You’re quoting Musk’s thoughts on democracy?

Try his latest muse on for size….”A republic of high status males is best for decision making. Democratic, but a democracy only for those who are free to think”.


View: https://x.com/gatomedianoche/status/1830645622052929650
 
Red said:
You’re quoting Musk’s thoughts on democracy?

Try his latest muse on for size….”A republic of high status males is best for decision making. Democratic, but a democracy only for those who are free to think”.


View: https://x.com/gatomedianoche/status/1830645622052929650
Click to expand...

It was less about musks four words and more about the whole article that explains how democrats are interfering in elections by kicking political opponents off of ballots to disenfranchise Jill Stein, or Cornell West, or RFk jr voters dum dum.
I could see how that might be real confusing for a moron though.
 
Mongoose said:
It was less about musks four words and more about the whole article that explains how democrats are interfering in elections by kicking political opponents off of ballots to disenfranchise Jill Stein, or Cornell West, or RFk jr voters dum dum.
I could see how that might be real confusing for a moron though.
Click to expand...

Aw man, you mean Jill stein, Cornell West or rfkjr aren't going to win the election this year now? Darn it

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
Mongoose said:
It was less about musks four words and more about the whole article that explains how democrats are interfering in elections by kicking political opponents off of ballots to disenfranchise Jill Stein, or Cornell West, or RFk jr voters dum dum.
I could see how that might be real confusing for a moron though.
Click to expand...
lol, was just going to leave you a like for clarifying your intent, until the last line. Lord God Almighty, perish the thought we be civil, lol..

One man, one man more than any other, encouraged hatred of groups of Americans against other Americans. Donald Trump was the first president in my long lifetime who never bothered to reach out to those who did not vote for him. Instead, he enthusiastically encouraged his supporters to hate any and all Americans who simply disagreed with his thoughts, his approach to leadership(Divide!, Divide!, Divide!), and his policies.

So, that one man did not start the culture wars or political opportunism. But, more than any other man, he encouraged Americans to be divided, to grow into a cold civil war. And you wonder, somehow, why people don’t approve of such an approach. You consider us fools for not recognizing the uniparty will always have its priorities. Yes, the powers that be in America do create a far less than ideal situation, and are only interested in their priorities, and their interests. But I can believe that, and know it’s true, and still see no good whatsoever in ushering in a hateful, fascist leaning demagogue to the office of the presidency. It will not help solve any of our many problems and inequalities.

We do not live in a perfect world. So I gave up Revolution against the man 50 years ago. Never forgot, but one grows up and does the best one can in this imperfect world and country. Believing that putting Donald Trump back in power would be very damaging, really does not make me a moron. I just have my own opinions and views, born of my own education and experience. But, thanks to Trump, this is where we’re at, and it’s a sad and completely unnecessary situation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MVP
fishonjazz said:
Aw man, you mean Jill stein, Cornell West or rfkjr aren't going to win the election this year now? Darn it

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Some of it just has to be about being a real democracy. You know having some leverage and political pull to make changes. You know so you can endorse other candidates and collaborate on solutions to problems. It would allow candidates to give concessions in exchange for endorsements. You know all that Democratic part of the political process that democrats hate. If a candidate like RFK jr gets a big enough percentage of votes they can actually qualify as another political party and they wouldn’t have to go through all the lawsuits and difficulty to get on ballots and challenge the corrupt uniparty in future elections. They could contribute to a better way forward and ultimately more choices or more opportunity for quality candidates in future elections. That is something many folks here pretend to want anyway.
So do you think that people should not be allowed to vote for whatever candidate they want? Should we only have one candidate on the ballot? That way everyone gets to vote for the winner!! What a great idea! That’s the way it’s done in communist countries.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PJF
Mongoose said:
Some of it just has to be about being a real democracy. You know having some leverage and political pull to make changes. You know so you can endorse other candidates and collaborate on solutions to problems. It would allow candidates to give concessions in exchange for endorsements. You know all that Democratic part of the political process that democrats hate. If a candidate like RFK jr gets a big enough percentage of votes they can actually qualify as another political party and they wouldn’t have to go through all the lawsuits and difficulty to get on ballots and challenge the corrupt uniparty in future elections. They could contribute to a better way forward and ultimately more choices or more opportunity for quality candidates in future elections. That is something many folks here pretend to want anyway.
So do you think that people should not be allowed to vote for whatever candidate they want? Should we only have one candidate on the ballot? That way everyone gets to vote for the winner!! What a great idea! That’s the way it’s done in communist countries.
Click to expand...
Lol at you thinking we ever had choice.

Also, what defines communism isn't how they choose or don't choose their leadership.

Communism is a political and economic system that aims to create a classless society where the public owns and controls the means of production. In a communist society, there is no private property, government, or currency, and wealth is divided equally or based on individual need.

Key characteristics of communism: Classless society: Communism seeks to eliminate socioeconomic class struggles by creating a society where everyone shares the benefits of labor.

Common ownership: All property and wealth are communally owned instead of by individuals.

Centrally planned production and distribution: Production and distribution are centrally planned based on the principle of "from everyone according to their skills, to everyone according to their needs".



Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
fishonjazz said:
Lol at you thinking we ever had choice.

Also, what defines communism isn't how they choose or don't choose their leadership.

Communism is a political and economic system that aims to create a classless society where the public owns and controls the means of production. In a communist society, there is no private property, government, or currency, and wealth is divided equally or based on individual need.

Key characteristics of communism: Classless society: Communism seeks to eliminate socioeconomic class struggles by creating a society where everyone shares the benefits of labor.

Common ownership: All property and wealth are communally owned instead of by individuals.

Centrally planned production and distribution: Production and distribution are centrally planned based on the principle of "from everyone according to their skills, to everyone according to their needs".



Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
LOL for knowing you have no choice and still supporting democrats. You fall for all the propaganda and stupidity. You are willfully stupid and powerless. There is no doubt less collaboration and certainly less of a choice in bluanon world. Your candidate didn’t even get votes. If you deviate in the slightest from any of those narrative you are cast out of the cult and called a conspiracy theorist or a racist or a Russian asset. That’s how I know it’s a cult. You can’t question their propaganda.
I can google communism too. I said that’s how elections work in communist countries I didn’t say that what defined it dum dum.
You do realize that only having one person on the ballot at election time is a bad thing right? Do we need to start there? Is that a concept you need to think over? Does that confuse you?
 
Last edited:
Red said:
lol, was just going to leave you a like for clarifying your intent, until the last line. Lord God Almighty, perish the thought we be civil, lol..

One man, one man more than any other, encouraged hatred of groups of Americans against other Americans. Donald Trump was the first president in my long lifetime who never bothered to reach out to those who did not vote for him. Instead, he enthusiastically encouraged his supporters to hate any and all Americans who simply disagreed with his thoughts, his approach to leadership(Divide!, Divide!, Divide!), and his policies.

So, that one man did not start the culture wars or political opportunism. But, more than any other man, he encouraged Americans to be divided, to grow into a cold civil war. And you wonder, somehow, why people don’t approve of such an approach. You consider us fools for not recognizing the uniparty will always have its priorities. Yes, the powers that be in America do create a far less than ideal situation, and are only interested in their priorities, and their interests. But I can believe that, and know it’s true, and still see no good whatsoever in ushering in a hateful, fascist leaning demagogue to the office of the presidency. It will not help solve any of our many problems and inequalities.

We do not live in a perfect world. So I gave up Revolution against the man 50 years ago. Never forgot, but one grows up and does the best one can in this imperfect world and country. Believing that putting Donald Trump back in power would be very damaging, really does not make me a moron. I just have my own opinions and views, born of my own education and experience. But, thanks to Trump, this is where we’re at, and it’s a sad and completely unnecessary situation.
Click to expand...

And just like his hero Hitler he wants to round up the undesirables and jail his enemies. He's on the record saying it yet unAmerican people like Mongoose and other Trumptards fully support him. He's turned them into zombies. They don't realize his only angle is unchecked power, and as he floats more and more outlandish, sinister plans they eat it up. The Rapist's final goal is Americans killing fellow Americans in his name, which he tried on Jan 6 and will try again.
 
Last edited:
Mongoose said:
The hype around Kamala was never real. She always sucked and nobody likes her. Her popularity is yet another conspiracy that the left fell for.
Even with all the election interference, the tech bias, the lawfare, kicking RFK jr. West, and everyone else off the ballot, the illegal immigrant votes, and with the media carrying her water, she won’t win. That’s how bad she is. Probably the worst candidate in history.


View: https://x.com/polymarket/status/1831338849550667895?s=46&t=PfGBft52CF1a98VsjZzilw
Click to expand...

Funny given most other forecasts, polls, and historical trends are showing Trump is in trouble.
 
TheStormofWar said:
Funny given most other forecasts, polls, and historical trends are showing Trump is in trouble.
Click to expand...
More to the point, win or lose, Kamala is dwarfing Biden's polling numbers (as much as one can in such a polarized national political context). She has a chance, Biden did not.

I endorse and functionally voted for having a chance as did basically every member of the party. The choice is between the end of the world (due to climate change but special shoutout to the broken Supreme Court, Trump's would-be Potemkin/rubber stamp Congress, and the absence of checks or balances with democracy on the line) vs. the chance of maybe not the end of the world. I'm thrilled to have that choice.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top