Pelicans aren't giving up 7 for thatJazz get: 7, Dejounte Murray
Pelicans get: 21, Keyonte George, John Collins
What do people think of this one.
Pelicans aren't giving up 7 for thatJazz get: 7, Dejounte Murray
Pelicans get: 21, Keyonte George, John Collins
What do people think of this one.
I'd definitely do thatJazz get: 7, Dejounte Murray
Pelicans get: 21, Keyonte George, John Collins
What do people think of this one.
Semi random, but what do people think of the idea of trading Keyonte for Anthony Black? We know Hardy loved Black during the draft but we know Mosley doesn’t love him. Corey freaking Joseph played more than Black during the playoffs.
I would be all for it. I don't know how far Anthony Black can develop but its clear that Orlando isn't all that commited to him. Black has little chance of breaking into the starting lineup as they already have Suggs and KCP at the starting guard spots. As you said, they played Corey Joseph more than Black in the playoffs.
Orlando is in desperate need of more guard scorer types. Keyonte straight up for Black works financially. Would Orlando want more?
Could do:
Jazz trades: Clarkson, Keyonte
Orlando trades: Anthony Black, Corey Joseph, Gary Harris
I'd assume that Houston values Playoff Fred.View attachment 18735
Reports that Philadelphia mostly wants to swap PG with a winning player to move down, but I have no interest in a PG/Lauri swap to move from 5 to 3. This trade ropes in Houston to provide the #10 for Philadelphia to move from to. Houston needs more shooting and brings in two 40+% shooters in place of FVV, while moving from 10->21 but some fringe seconds. Maybe a Brice to grease the wheels to Houston?
IDK how much Houston values FVV for his culture and pace, leaves them a bit of playmaking hole. They did extend his team option extension date which may signal they are exploring trades. Maybe they are still high on Reed. But as we target premium assets I would really like to secure #3 and #5 this year. FVV could potentially be swapped with a Murray or a Lillard to help secure the tank this year.
How far off do you guys think this is?
I’s be fine doing it for swaps. The Bucks just don’t have assets, and there’s always the potential that a swap hits big. Any increased value in our picks down the road is good business. There’s a risk for sure, but the Jazz aren’t getting a big trade without taking back terrible salary that screws up their timeline further. If I did make a trade with Milwaukee for Dame, I’d want probably want a couple of swaps in that deal.I don't need an unprotected pick in a Dame for Collins/Sexton trade. I guess the only thing that would prevent me from doing something like that is if we can get more draft compensation by trading them elsewhere, but all we'd get is seconds anyways.