What's new

Court: California gay marriage ban is unconstitutional

Is there a law that says person must keep their religious views out of politics? I must have missed that one...or are you creating a new law?

I'm officially convinced that we've all been the victim of one of the better troll jobs on this forum. I suppose congrats is in order for Craig, because damn, you go girl.
 
I really liked you Craig but I am having an increasingly hard time doing so and I generally like everyone.

I never said the mormon church will lose or is going to lose that status. I never defended unions with that status getting involved in politics. The discussion was specifically about the mormon church as an institution not getting involved in politics.

Okay....I get that

Any organization/group with a tax exempt status should stay out of politics as a organization/group unless they do not care about that tax exempt status.

Is that what the tax law is? or is it just your opinion

You just automatically assume everyone is against you when that is not the truth at all.

Uh, hardly. I know a lot of people are on my side. I don't feel persecuted at all.


Hopefully you are only trolling and this is not really your outlook on life. If it is I pity you.

I have been quite honest. I am not saying things just to be a troll. I do phrase things in such a way that tends to get on people's nevers, but I always do that. I throw a lot of inside jokes into things I say. Most of my friends really love that about me. People who aren't my friends hate me for it.

But yes, this is my outlook on life. But I would say that you should not waste your pity on me.

Late last night, a girl I know well asked me what I was up to. I told her I was having a ball. She asked what I was doing. I sent her a link to this thread. She loved it and said she was very proud of me. Take that for whatever you think it's worth.
 
It is incredibly difficult to defeat the willfully ignorant.

Oh.
You know....I may have a few opinions about you, but I would not ever think for a second to call you ignorant when I have never met you or spoken to you in person or know anything about your life.


Or was that supposed to be an insult?
I get called ignorant all the time by people who get pissed because I will not conform my opinions to theirs. It's their way of saying "I give up and I hate you"
Not that this is what you necesarily think
 
Craig you keep talking about law. No one is talking about law but you. One of the requirements of a tax exempt status is that as an organization a tax exempt group does not get involved in politics. Any group with that status needs to decide if they would rather keep that status or get involved in politics. Whatever they decide is fine.

As for the "everyone against me" comment I was reffering to on here and that is why I said I hope that is not your outlook on life as well.
 
I'm officially convinced that we've all been the victim of one of the better troll jobs on this forum. I suppose congrats is in order for Craig, because damn, you go girl.

Probably but it is a good way to hone your discussion abilities.
 
Craig you keep talking about law. No one is talking about law but you. One of the requirements of a tax exempt status is that as an organization a tax exempt group does not get involved in politics. Any group with that status needs to decide if they would rather keep that status or get involved in politics. Whatever they decide is fine.

As for the "everyone against me" comment I was reffering to on here and that is why I said I hope that is not your outlook on life as well.

Ok,.....I am listening (and hearing) you

If the Mormon Church has stepped over the line, then why do they still have their "tax-exempt" status?
 
Ok,.....I am listening (and hearing) you

If the Mormon Church has stepped over the line, then why do they still have their "tax-exempt" status?


The original point I responded to is why the Mormon Church should not be involve din politics. I gave a reason. I never said the Mormon Church had stepped over a line. I am just saying they should not be involved in politics if they want their tax exempt status. That is it. No accusations.

Edit: Some unions are obviously involved in politics and if they have a tax exempt status then it should be reviewed to see if they still qualify.
 
Oh.
You know....I may have a few opinions about you, but I would not ever think for a second to call you ignorant when I have never met you or spoken to you in person or know anything about your life.


Or was that supposed to be an insult?
I get called ignorant all the time by people who get pissed because I will not conform my opinions to theirs. It's their way of saying "I give up and I hate you"
Not that this is what you necesarily think
Maybe they call you ignorant because you make statements like:

craig2112 said:
homosexuality destroys nations. That is a fact.

If you were willing to justify statements like this and respond to the actual questions people ask you, instead of deflecting them, posting meaningless youtube videos, incredibly obvious propaganda films and internet memes, and pretending to be a victim, people might not call you ignorant.
 
You should look up the definition of IGNORANT

And look at the last page, someone posted something about breaking up the family will destroy nations. I stand by that.

I can see that saying "THAT IS A FACT" really got under your skin.
 
The original point I responded to is why the Mormon Church should not be involve din politics. I gave a reason. I never said the Mormon Church had stepped over a line. I am just saying they should not be involved in politics if they want their tax exempt status. That is it. No accusations.

Edit: Some unions are obviously involved in politics and if they have a tax exempt status then it should be reviewed to see if they still qualify.

I guess I am not hearing you.
You say that the Mormon Church is going to lose their status if they don't stay out of politics. But they have NOT stayed out of politics and yet still retain their status.

What am I missing here?
 
Simply becasue you say so?

Marrriage is whatever the people entering into it want it to be. That is the truth wether you recognize it or not.

Yup, heterosexuals can make their married life however they want it to be, but marriage exists as a government sanctioned institution for the purpose of raising the next generation of citizens. Governments have recognized that kids tend to be healthier, better adjusted, and not on welfare if they have a married mom and dad. The feds even give tax benefits to married couples when one of them stays home to raise the children.
 
Okay....I get that



Is that what the tax law is? or is it just your opinion



Uh, hardly. I know a lot of people are on my side. I don't feel persecuted at all.




I have been quite honest. I am not saying things just to be a troll. I do phrase things in such a way that tends to get on people's nevers, but I always do that. I throw a lot of inside jokes into things I say. Most of my friends really love that about me. People who aren't my friends hate me for it.

But yes, this is my outlook on life. But I would say that you should not waste your pity on me.

Late last night, a girl I know well asked me what I was up to. I told her I was having a ball. She asked what I was doing. I sent her a link to this thread. She loved it and said she was very proud of me. Take that for whatever you think it's worth.

**** bro! I bet you got some sweet *** hand holding and cuddling action from that! **** yeah!
 
Selfishness is the main issue, and Homosexuality is only one of many branches of the core issue.

The Family is the fundamental unit of society, and that has been broken and eroded quite a bit in the last 100 years. Selfishness is the main reason there is so much discord in a family, it is the main reason children will not talk to parents or parents will not talk to children. It is the main reason for divorce. It is the main reason for cheating among spouses, or sexual relations before marriage. More and more children have been raised in an atmosphere farther and farther from that of a loving and nurturing home with a father and a mother present that love them and love each other.

Homosexuality has no place in a family, its nature runs a course opposite to that of which a family could be created or formed. If two men or two women were the last two people on the earth they could not procreate. They would be the last two people on earth, period. As to religion, one of the purposes of life is to procreate and be part of the “creation” of life. As to science it has been said that one of the first “instincts” is to pass your genes on. Homosexuality plays no useful role in either religious ideas, or scientifically the passing on of genes, but is mainly a selfish act of those involved. At best homosexual intercourse form a bond between those participating. Heterosexual intercourse can be a selfish act, it can form a bond between two people, and it can form an even more beautiful bond between those people through the formation of new life.

Some info and statistics about homosexuality:

Dr. Neil Whitehead and Briar Whitehead state regarding various cultures: "If homosexuality were significantly influenced by genes, it would appear in every culture, but in twenty-nine of seventy-nine cultures surveyed by Ford and Beach in 1952, homosexuality was rare or absent."
https://www.mygenes.co.nz/download.htm

Dr. Tahir I. Jaz, M.D., Winnipeg, Canada states: "The increasing claims of being "born that way" parallels the rising political activism of homosexual organisations, who politicise the issue of homosexual origins . In the 1970s, approximately ten percent of homosexuals claimed to be "born homosexual" according to a large scale survey....However, in a survey in the 1980s, with the homosexual rights movement increasingly becoming active, thirty-five percent claimed to be born that way.
https://www.flyfishingdevon.co.uk/salmon/year2/hormones/tahir.htm

Risks of the homosexual lifestyle to children

Finally, research has demonstrated considerable risks to children exposed to the homosexual lifestyle. Violence between homosexual partners is two to three times more common than among married heterosexual couples.25,26,27,28,29 Homosexual partnerships are significantly more prone to dissolution than heterosexual marriages with the average homosexual relationship lasting only two to three years.30,31,32,33 Homosexual men and women are reported to be promiscuous, with serial sex partners, even within what are loosely-termed "committed relationships.34,35,36,37,38 Individuals who practice a homosexual lifestyle are more likely than heterosexuals to experience mental illness,39,40,41 substance abuse,42 suicidal tendencies43,44 and shortened life spans.45 Although some would claim that these dysfunctions are a result of societal pressures in America, the same dysfunctions exist at inordinately high levels among homosexuals in cultures where the practice is more widely accepted.46
https://www.acpeds.org/Homosexual-Parenting-Is-It-Time-For-Change.html


Regarding Homosexuality and health, of newly diagnosed HIV infections in the United States during the year 2003, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimated that about 63% were among men who were infected through sexual contact with other men.
HIV incidence and prevalence are high among MSM, and many are unaware they are HIV positive. The high level of unrecognized HIV infections among MSM is a public health concern. Persons aware of their HIV infection often take steps to reduce their risk behaviors, which could reduce HIV transmission (9). To increase the proportion of HIV-positive persons who know they are infected, sexually active MSM should be encouraged to have an HIV test at least annually. Corresponding efforts should be developed to address barriers to testing, particularly those related to fear, and to increase the availability of testing in clinical and nonclinical settings (10). Testing programs should target both younger MSM and black MSM to reach populations disproportionately unaware they are HIV positive.

https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5424a2.htm

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention stated the following regarding syphilis in the United States: "While surveillance data are not available by risk behavior, a separate CDC analysis suggests that approximately 64 percent of all adult P&S syphilis cases in 2004 were among men who have sex with men, up from an estimated 5 percent in 1999...."

The CDC reported the following regarding the United States and homosexuality: "CDC conducted sentinel surveillance in 28 cities and found the proportion of cases resistant to fluoroquinolone antibiotics (a first-line treatment for gonorrhea) increased from 4.1 percent in 2003 to 6.8 percent in 2004. Resistance is especially worrisome in men who have sex with men, where it was eight times higher than among heterosexuals (23.8 percent vs. 2.9 percent)."

In 2006, The Medical Journal of Australia stated the following: "High rates of intestinal parasitism are found in MSM [men who have sex with men] throughout the world."
https://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/185_08_161006/sta10803_fm.html


In 2007 the Los Angeles Times reported the frequency of methamphetamine use is twenty times greater among homosexuals than in the general population.

https://www.narth.com/docs/methuse.html

I feel in a similar way about people that are heterosexual and cheat on their spouse, sleep around before marriage, etc. I feel they all have a negative impact on our society, and the excuse that they only affect themselves with their choices is a cop out. Every choice you make affects you and the people around you. They are the core foundation of who you are, how you interact with others, and form a base for future decisions. Even choices we make when we are alone have an impact. Each choice is a stone tossed into the lake of life, and the ripples from that splash will be there either large or small depending on the size of the stone (choice)… but they will definitely be there even if we try to be blind to it.

By the way there are more links, studies, statistics, bla bla bla out there if you care to look for it. I’m sure one of you will look into debunking the doctors, writers, researchers, and whoever did this work, while finding plenty of quotes, research, statistics, doctors and whatnot to “prove” some other argument.
I just threw this sample together to show there is information out there to backup what I believe and think even if I usually don’t care to throw it around. I apologize if a link or two do not work, I haven't had to time to test them all to make sure they go to the right places.
I'm sure you will be my beta testers and let me know every flaw in the post.
 
I guess I am not hearing you.
You say that the Mormon Church is going to lose their status if they don't stay out of politics. But they have NOT stayed out of politics and yet still retain their status.

What am I missing here?

Then they like every other group that has done so should be reviewed to see if they still qualify. To use your use of the word law. If a particular action is against the law but that law is not enforced sholdl you break it? Personally I want my church to honor their commitments and obligations. If they feel that they would be better able to do by getting involved in politics. Then great. they should be a stand up organization and say we no longer qualify.
 
So the church is against drinking right? Why don't they try to ban alcohol completely? Am I missing something here?
 
You should look up the definition of IGNORANT

And look at the last page, someone posted something about breaking up the family will destroy nations. I stand by that.

I can see that saying "THAT IS A FACT" really got under your skin.
1. I'm well aware of the definition of "ignorant". I took your suggestion, however, and looked it up. Feel free to post a definition of ignorant from whatever dictionary you use, and I'll explain how the word applies to you, based on your posts in this thread.

2. Just because you stand by something, doesn't make it factual. If breaking up the family does destroy nations (you've yet to provide any evidence of this), how does legalizing same-sex marriages break up the family? Can you provide any support for any of these assertions?

3. I'm far more shocked than pissed off at what you consider "fact". If it is "fact", it should be easy to justify.
 
So the church is against drinking right? Why don't they try to ban alcohol completely? Am I missing something here?

Yeah, I think you are missing something.

I can't tell you how many times I have heard people whine about the "theocracy" in Utah that has put so many drinking laws on the state books.

But that is really off topic
 
Back
Top