Court: California gay marriage ban is unconstitutional

[AtheistPreacher]

I really don't feel like reading that much text.

*sigh*

Thus proving everything I've said. Quod erat demonstrandum.

 

[AtheistPreacher]

Wait, I thought you said this video wasn't biased? Anyone who says "The left does blah blah blah blah and everything bad in the world" (or replace left with right, either way) is biased.

Saying this isn't biased is like saying Michael Moore isn't biased.

 

[craig2112]

Wait, I thought you said this video wasn't biased? Anyone who says "The left does blah blah blah blah and everything bad in the world" (or replace left with right, either way) is biased.

REEEEEAAAAAAALLLLLLY? SO if you don't agree with my source, then it is biased.

Did I not say that you would say that?

DUH!

Well, you have provided some entertainment. But I really think I was having more fun in the "Woman's logic" thread.

SHEESH!

 

[craig2112]

*sigh*

Thus proving everything I've said. Quod erat demonstrandum.

I started reading and immediately got bored. Sorry. Some people write in such a way that I must read it. Others.....

 

[fallenchicken]

This video was very informative for me. A true eye-opener.

Step One:

Make our kids gay by giving them books.

And of course, everyone knows that gays=communists.

 

[GVC]

Well, duh.

 

[craig2112]

Thank you, Jazzfanz. That's it for me!

Goodnight everybody!!!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O27RzZEOkeA

K-UUUUGER!!!!!

 

[AtheistPreacher]

I started reading and immediately got bored. Sorry. Some people write in such a way that I must read it. Others.....

I find it deeply amusing that you (above) jump all over people with caps and exclamation points for simply saying your source is biased. And yet when I provide substantive reasons for you to respond to, you can't be bothered. Because, you know... then you might actually lose the argument. Much safer for you to say nothing and just snipe at people.

I hope you realize that the only one who looks silly in this conversation is you. People pay money to see people make lesser fools of themselves than you are doing for free.

 

[Revolution 9]

and all those millions of dollars used by the LDS church have now gone to waste.

Next time maybe they can spend their money on preserving the right for others to live their lives as they choose.
....and realise just because they do this doesnt mean they are agreeing with them. When you allow others to live
in a different way than you(and respect thier choice), it only makes you look stronger.

 

[Nate505]

Good. Civil rights are something that should not be denied by a vote.

 

[PearlWatson]

How did keeping marriage laws between one man and one woman somehow magically become "unconstitutional" 200 years down the line?
Marriage laws are in the states hands and the people of California voted on it.

The silly attempt to convince a Mormon that homosexuality was moral through bible passages was amusing. They look to their prophets to explain what God believes to be moral (God is where morality stems from). Check out The Proclamation on the Family to understand their beliefs on marriage.

But even if homosexuality is moral, restrictions on state or federally sanctioned marriage ain't a restriction on homosexual activity so that point is moot.

I think the real question is NOT "Why do some people want to keep marriage between one man and one woman?" it is "Why do some homosexuals want the federal government involved in their relationships?"

 

[Bronco70]

I don't know a lot of gay people personally (only three that I can think of off the top of my head), but none that I have ever come across have an agenda any further than being allowed to live their lives as they choose.

There probably are some that try to push their lifestyle on others (you see this in any segment of society), but I can't imagine it would be more than tiny fraction. Hardly worth stereotyping the whole group over.