Sardines
Well-Known Member
I have little reason to get my hopes upWe really have to hope this goes somewhere and that the corruption of the supreme court isn't so amoral as to keep them protecting the worst criminal president in our history.
I have little reason to get my hopes upWe really have to hope this goes somewhere and that the corruption of the supreme court isn't so amoral as to keep them protecting the worst criminal president in our history.
Unfortunately, this. In spades.I have little reason to get my hopes up
The answer is simple. Whatever trump says the acceptable age is.Wondering what PJF and the other pedos on this board think at which age its acceptable to have sex with kids?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
FWIW, Megyn Kelly isn’t sure anymore. “There’s a difference between a 15 year old and a 5 year old”.Wondering what PJF and the other pedos on this board think at which age its acceptable to have sex with kids?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
FWIW, Megyn Kelly isn’t sure anymore. “There’s a difference between a 15 year old and a 5 year old”.
![]()
Megyn Kelly suddenly finds pedophilia very hard to define
When a 16-year-old accused Russell Brand of rape, Kelly begged conservatives to condemn him. Now she's splitting hairs about men "into the barely legal type."www.motherjones.com
Wednesday, on her eponymous SiriusXM show, Kelly picked another hill to die on: She implied, in conversation with NewsNation host Batya Ungar-Sargon, that it wasn’t quite fair to call Jeffrey Epstein a pedophile because he was “into the barely legal type” of minors—which Kelly appallingly defines as “like, 15-year-olds”—who look like they could be legal adults. Epstein was charged with sex trafficking of minors and conspiracy to commit sex trafficking of minors, and the Department of Justice said he abused and exploited dozens of underage girls, some as young as 14.
View: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/kgiB8qWBHjk