What's new

What should the FO do if we are 0.500 by January?

If you were put in charge of the FO, what would you do if the Jazz were 0.500 on January 1st


  • Total voters
    62
Besides personnel change and benching, we can also get Hardy to cool it with coaching hard for the W. If Hardy doesn't lazer focus on getting the W against DET, the narrative is probably a lot different. We would have lost against DET and be happier with our W against SAS. But since we beat two good teams back to back the tank is suddenly over. There's been a few games like that earlier in the year as well. We've won games because Hardy is focused on it, and we've also lost some games where Hardy probably could have coached us to a W if he wanted.

We gotta cut out the flip flopping whenever and wherever we can. Just a few wins can make a big difference.
I just don’t think it’s in Hardy’s DNA to not coach as hard as possible for each W. He’s not gonna do it. We've got to kneecap the roster if we have any hope of keeping the pick.
 
I just don’t think it’s in Hardy’s DNA to not coach as hard as possible for each W. He’s not gonna do it. We've got to kneecap the roster if we have any hope of keeping the pick.

He does it all the time. Did so all of last season and even some games this year. Look at the LAL game for example. If you think Hardy in the game was the same as Hardy in the DET game I’ve got beachfront property in Idaho to sell you.

Hardy is proven to be compliant, and that’s a good thing. If there is instruction from the FO he’ll do it.
 
Acting like we can't tank with a player of Lauri caliber is just wrong. OKC did it with SGA

People always roll out SGA/OKC as an example of "tanking with a star".

I've said it before and I'll say it again: SGA was really young when that happened. OKC were in no rush with him, they knew he wasn't even in his prime yet.

With Lauri, it's totally different. He's smack in the middle of his prime, has a max deal, is approaching 30 and the Jazz are wasting a massive asset.

Makes no sense.
 
Just let it play out.

If we keep our pick, then great. Draft whoever happens to be our missing piece then full speed ahead.

But if we fail to keep our pick, we consolidate our assets and go all in on Anthony Black. Give Orlando any combination of Collier/Brice/Tay/Cavs firsts/Lakers firsts/Wolves firsts until they say yes. A starting five of Key/Black/Ace/Lauri/Kess should be enough to contend for years to come.
 
Just let it play out.

If we keep our pick, then great. Draft whoever happens to be our missing piece then full speed ahead.

But if we fail to keep our pick, we consolidate our assets and go all in on Anthony Black. Give Orlando any combination of Collier/Brice/Tay/Cavs firsts/Lakers firsts/Wolves firsts until they say yes. A starting five of Key/Black/Ace/Lauri/Kess should be enough to contend for years to come.
I dont hate this idea. Black can also exploit the gravity provided by Lauri because he is a good enough passer to find Lauri (or Key) if the defence cheats off him. He can also defend the point pretty well.

I think those 3 paired with a competent center (doesnt even have to be a spacer, so Kessler could work) and a solid wing defender and you got a starting lineup that can win their minutes against anyone. Then if Ace pops and reaches his theoretical ceiling, you got a monster team.
 
We’re 12-20.

The only real benefit to I see in letting it “play out” is that it feels better in the meantime. You don’t get rewarded for being a slightly less bad team.

I keep seeing people using the Jazz being better than expected or Keyonte’s breakout season as justification that we don’t need to tank. I don’t really understand that. If you truly believe you have some in Key+Lauri it’s extra important that you build the best team possible around them.
 
Back
Top