Wow, hadn't visited this thread in a while.
Very entertaining.
Pretty much the usual clap-trap, but one thing caught my attention:
I'm not a big fan of Wynn, but that's beyond ridiculous. Given the opportunity to swap Wynn and Nelson, straight across, I would say "no thanks" 100 times out of 100. Even with Wynn's injury history.
Conan's right, Nelson is more of a gamer and tougher than Wynn. There's actually parts of Wynn's game that I think are merely "ok", but I don't spend a ton of time worrying about it because this guy is Utah's version of Chad Pennington. You know the next good hit he takes, one of those shoulders is blowing up again. However, unlike the past, this time Utah has guys like Travis Wilson/Chase Hansen who can take the field and never give the starting job up.
I think Riley Nelson will continue to look good against teams who don't have good athletes on defense. Utah's D is the perfect example of what Riley is going to struggle with:
-A unit with a strong defensive line that can pressure the QB up the middle, thus negating many of the rushing lanes Riley tends to want to take when the pocket breaks down.
-A defensive backfield that plays man coverage almost all the time, allowing Utah to put more players in the box to account for Riley's running ability.
-Athletes across the board on defense that will be able to contend with Riley's athleticism.
It must be maddening for the Cougar fan with good football IQ (all 12 of them). Riley will look like a Heisman candidate against half the schedule and they'll have to hear uneducated Cougar fan go on and on about how he was the right choice over Jake Heaps, what a great/gritty player he is, etc. Meanwhile, against the teams with better talent, he's most likely going to struggle. Just my opinion, but if you're talented enough to contend with his ability to improvise, you've pretty much contained 90% of his game.