What's new
By:

Should the South secede?

SiroMar said:
********. Only the fifth installment was under his watch. And guess what? It's generally considered the best entry in the series! The others, the ones that did so much more harm, were under George W. Bush.
Click to expand...

Really? Weren't the border agents killed under Obama's watch?

And really? We're still playing the "blame Bush" card??
 
I have a better idea. Let's just create two countries .. one is ALL liberals and the other is ALL conservatives.

Go!
 
PKM said:
I have a better idea. Let's just create two countries .. one is ALL liberals and the other is ALL conservatives.

Go!
Click to expand...

I root for the conservatives because they're more respectable, but, at the end of the day, liberals win, because, deep down, they're prone to thinking, beside all the fingers in the ears lalalaing they're equally prone to, and, because conservatives hawkish willingness to protect their pansy asses, regardless. Commas FTW.
 
franklin said:
I root for the conservatives because they're more respectable, but, at the end of the day, liberals win, because, deep down, they're prone to thinking, beside all the fingers in the ears lalalaing they're equally prone to, and, because conservatives hawkish willingness to protect their pansy asses, regardless. Commas FTW.
Click to expand...

Tried to rep.
 
PKM said:
You still haven't asked my plenty-asked question. What does any of this have to do with me? Just hate? I do think you're cute, though.
Click to expand...

Please read posts before writing.

I asked you this question weeks ago and you dodged it. I saw that you were online and asked you to explain.
 
The Thriller said:
Please read posts before writing.

I asked you this question weeks ago and you dodged it. I saw that you were online and asked you to explain.
Click to expand...

I think you just asked who pays for roads, who subsidizes farmers.. ?? Dude, you are so schizo/bi-polar/adhd that I don't know what you're even asking me, or why.

If that was the question.. the answer is taxpayers.
 
PKM said:
I think you just asked who pays for roads, who subsidizes farmers.. ?? Dude, you are so schizo/bi-polar/adhd that I don't know what you're even asking me, or why.

If that was the question.. the answer is taxpayers.
Click to expand...

RIF-logo-blue_large.gif
 
Scat said:
The red states have all the hardest workers too. Know how to put in a good day's labor. Blue states all just shuffle paper and brag about how much smarter they are than red states.
Click to expand...

How so? Most red states are too busy living off the government and listening to Rush to work.
 
Scat said:
Really? Weren't the border agents killed under Obama's watch?

And really? We're still playing the "blame Bush" card??
Click to expand...

Repubs still blame our nation's problems on Clinton and Carter... Even FDR!!!

I know of thousands of Americans without family members today who can all thank Bush for their losses. And the trillions we've lost in Afghanistan and Iraq? yep, somebody's gotta pay that back too.

Oh yeah, the tax cuts have created billions in deficits and Medicare part D is an insane failure.

How many trillions has repub leadership cost us with their Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, wars in the mideast, tax cuts, and Medicare part D? True, they couldn't have done some of those things without the cooperation of demos. Demos might be the Curtis Borchardt of fail. Repubs are the Kwame Brown of fail.
 
Last edited:
PKM said:
If that was the question.. the answer is taxpayers.
Click to expand...

Goooooodddd!!!

We're making progress! It feels like we're reading those SAM I AM books in elementary school.

Now how would those red states survive without those darn blue states (where much of the population resides) survive without all those tax dollars taken from those blue taxpayers?
 
@Thriller - You are truly a walking poster-boy for a.d.d.

You typed in post #70;
The Thriller said:
As if that's better???!!! LOL!!!

Who paid for all those highways? Who keeps Hill Field afloat?

time to run off and disappear. Typical
Click to expand...

I replied (directly and quoted the last post) in post #75;
PKM said:
You still haven't asked my plenty-asked question. What does any of this have to do with me? Just hate? I do think you're cute, though.
Click to expand...

You replied to that post (directly and quoted the last post) in #80;
The Thriller said:
Please read posts before writing.

I asked you this question weeks ago and you dodged it. I saw that you were online and asked you to explain.
Click to expand...

I replied to that post (directly and quoted the last post) in #89;
PKM said:
I think you just asked who pays for roads, who subsidizes farmers.. ?? Dude, you are so schizo/bi-polar/adhd that I don't know what you're even asking me, or why.

If that was the question.. the answer is taxpayers.
Click to expand...

You replied in (directly and quoted the last post) post #90;
The Thriller said:
RIF-logo-blue_large.gif
Click to expand...

AND THEN you neg repped me;
Read post 54
Click to expand...

Which says;
The Thriller said:
How so? I brought it up several weeks ago as a honest question. You then got your panties in a twist and STILL refuse to answer. Classic PKM. Dish it out but can't take it. What are you hiding?

If you really wish to enlighten me, PM me. Because I believe it's only a matter of when not IF Cal gets caught at Kentucky. Just look at the disasters he has left all of his other previous college jobs.

if you can't enlighten me, then why even argue? Why get your panties all in a twist?

it's like... Me wanting to know how Enes Kanter is doing with this new workout program, you saying that you know, and then refusing to tell, and then blaming me for not knowing. It just... Doesn't make sense!
Click to expand...

Now, can you see why I think you're a little nuts? And I need reading comprehension?









Oh, and by the way, I answered your beloved post #54. I did so in #58 and 71.. well before your post #80 (above) that asked why I never answered.
 
Last edited:
PKM said:
@Thriller - You are truly a walking poster-boy for a.d.d.

You typed in post #70;


I replied (directly and quoted the last post) in post #75;


You replied to that post (directly and quoted the last post) in #80;


I replied to that post (directly and quoted the last post) in #89;


You replied in (directly and quoted the last post) post #90;


AND THEN you neg repped me;


Which says;


Now, can you see why I think you're a little nuts? And I need reading comprehension?









Oh, and by the way, I answered your beloved post #54. I did so in #58 and 71.. well before your post #80 (above) that asked why I never answered.
Click to expand...

facepalm.jpg


I think your problem is that there are a number of conversations going on in this thread that you cannot keep straight. There's some joking going on, like Scat started, some serious posts about the situation, and my posts in which I questioned you about Cal. My fault was bringing him up but since I saw you were online I thought you could quickly answer those questions while also talking/joking about this topic.

Apparently not.
 
The Thriller said:
I think my problem is that there are a number of conversations going on in this thread that I cannot keep straight.
Click to expand...

Fixed. (with all evidence needed in post #94)

And I'm thinking I should be taking the advice of those that have PM'd me to just ignore you.
 
you guys do have a habit of refusing to just make a simple answer to a simple question
you'll fill up pages and pages with junk, diversions, and vitriol, rather than do this.
 
northeast said:
you guys do have a habit of refusing to just make a simple answer to a simple question
you'll fill up pages and pages with junk, diversions, and vitriol, rather than do this.
Click to expand...

False. Your trolling is hereby called out and I banish you to the outer darkness. Be gone.

*sitting with one eye barely asquint*
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top