What's new

Another Roger Braille thread

Was there a link in there somewhere?

I was just thinking that we hadn't heard anything about Braille lately and wondered if no news is good news.

Strange.
 
They have no bench and need shooters in that offense. Trade them Roger and Foye for their 1st this year. All of a sudden, they have some shooters and depth. Boom!
 
They have no bench and need shooters in that offense. Trade them Roger and Foye for their 1st this year. All of a sudden, they have some shooters and depth. Boom!

we dont want to help them, we want them to take the virus "roger Braille" from us and let it drag the lakers straight to the lottery.
 
Help them? Have you seen Foye's +/- numbers this year?

yeah i have seen them. i think he would be better if corbin took him out when he stopped hitting his shots. when foye is hot he is hot. when he is off he is way off. and it dosnt matter if he is hot or cold, his defence always stinks.
 
yeah i have seen them. i think he would be better if corbin took him out when he stopped hitting his shots. when foye is hot he is hot. when he is off he is way off. and it dosnt matter if he is hot or cold, his defence always stinks.

No ****. So how would that help the Lakers?
 
No ****. So how would that help the Lakers?

hey, hey, hey.... no reason to get all **** "whatever that is" on me.

becasue i bet the lakers coaching staff would be smart enough to tell when he is hot and when he is cold and play him accordingly.
 
The Jazz have no incentive to trade him. In order for a deal to be worked for us to send Bell to LA they have to find a way to make the Jazz interested. I don't see anything on their roster they would be willing to trade for Bell that the Jazz also want.
 
The Jazz have no incentive to trade him. In order for a deal to be worked for us to send Bell to LA they have to find a way to make the Jazz interested. I don't see anything on their roster they would be willing to trade for Bell that the Jazz also want.

i would trade him just to get the open roster spot... and maybe a box of zingers.
 
i would trade him just to get the open roster spot... and maybe a box of zingers.

If you have a box of zingers, they are now considered assets according to Stern. In his last will and testament, he made it so you could use the zingers as some sort of filler/trade exception to make up differences in trades.
 
i would trade him just to get the open roster spot... and maybe a box of zingers.

If they could provide enough Hostess Cupcakes to sponsor a Hostess Cupcake night I'd consider it solid.
 
I was just thinking to myself, how could the Lakers get better...and I instantly thought, ROGER BRAILLE!!

I think if they sent us a wink and a pat on the ***, we would be stupid to refuse.
 
The Jazz have no incentive to trade him. In order for a deal to be worked for us to send Bell to LA they have to find a way to make the Jazz interested. I don't see anything on their roster they would be willing to trade for Bell that the Jazz also want.
Pick any end of bench Laker who can then be waived and add in their 1st round draft pick (lottery protected). It's likely they don't want another guaranteed salary next year because it just puts them further into the luxury tax. That gets the deal done.
 
Pick any end of bench Laker who can then be waived and add in their 1st round draft pick (lottery protected). It's likely they don't want another guaranteed salary next year because it just puts them further into the luxury tax. That gets the deal done.
do they even have a pick? I thought they already traded it.
 
Top