Go on....
Yes, we do.
Go on....
If you had read the definition Stoked quoted for your benefit, you would have seen this was not true. Polygamy is the umbrella term for polygyny, polyandry, and group marriage.
I agree, but this is an issue of sexism, not vocabulary.
Wait...what? I have until now, not posted in this thread? When did I quote a definition?
Polygamy and polyandry of very distinct things, and I doubt many people in discussing 'polygamy' have polyandry as part of their frame of reference.
Also, how people here feel about polygamy (mostly men here) will often be quite different than how they feel about polyandry, particularly since it is far easier for them to imagine how they'd feel about the latter than the former. (People tend to be much less in favor of something if they perceive they be the ones disadvantaged/oppressed/inconvenienced/etc. as a result.)
That's a cliche answer. Got any real thoughts?
Why couldn't you handle it?
I think it gets really interesting when we break through the standard answers of "wow one woman is tough enough" and really consider it. What would it be like? We have some tv shows to go by, but that dramatizes it. It wouldn't be just all sex all the time, or all nagging all the time. There are times my wife and I both thought another adult in the home would be great. Potentially a third income stream. Someone else to help corral the kids. Someone maybe available for getting to that appointment we almost missed for whatever reason. Could there be a marriage that was celibate except for one partner, say the "primary" partner?
I'm all for an open marriage, though I don't feel that strongly about it to not get married unless that's on the table.
However, I'm quite sure the fiance to be isn't, so there goes that. Just floating the idea got me a bit of a look. Still, I think in general monogamy is totally unnatural, but I can't help the culture I grew in which goes against nature and encourages it.
That being said I don't like the idea of living with more than one wife. For one I'm a bit of a hermit and like my alone time, and multiple partners means more times to be bothered.
I think you take religion out of the equation and have a marriage of 3 true equals you'd get a lot of "2 against 1" scenarios with the two women inevitably teaming up to slit the man's throat while he's sleeping.
The way this came up in conversation with my wife was through a friend of hers who went through an ugly divorce about 8 years ago. She is now in her late 30's and was talking to my wife about how hard it is to date at that age, especially considering the fact that she has a kid whom she has custody of. We have invited her to many activities in our family over the years and I would consider her my friend too. She was pretty down and told my wife she feels like the "good men" are so few and far between, and told her she was lucky to have me. She is LDS and finding single LDS men at that age can come with it's own weird baggage. My wife thought about that and thought well what if she could marry me? She would have a decent husband and father, someone who at least approximates her values, and they both are more or less best friends to begin with.
This is actually something that happens sometimes. . . .
It says your wife is essentially very secure in her marriage and that you've treated her pretty good overall. My wife has had a few friends more or less conduct their pity parties on the same notion, but she tells them they can just have me. . . .
Actually little known by LDS faithful, there were, I believe, instances of polyandry in LDS history. This was not some offshoot Mormon sect but mainstream members during, I believe, the Nauvoo period.
For whatever it's worth.