Hantlers
Well-Known Member
So, I realize that I apparently annoyed you by reporting a bunch of posts. (oh the horror)
Now as I recall, that is not against the rules. Nowhere is it stated that I am not allowed to do that...and, I did not receive a warning. In fact, the closest I got to a warning was Colton saying that they would be ignored. The only other responses were from Nate, and he simply said, "a thousand ***** weren't given". Obviously he was giving off the persona that he didn't care. So is this the new behavior I should expect from the mods? Ban people when they annoy you without giving them proper warnings?
I look forward to your responses. Again, I'll say that I wouldn't have a problem if there had been a proper warning (infraction), rather then just going straight for the ban hammer because I reported some posts that you didn't like. This whole thing just seems a little petty to me.
Now as I recall, that is not against the rules. Nowhere is it stated that I am not allowed to do that...and, I did not receive a warning. In fact, the closest I got to a warning was Colton saying that they would be ignored. The only other responses were from Nate, and he simply said, "a thousand ***** weren't given". Obviously he was giving off the persona that he didn't care. So is this the new behavior I should expect from the mods? Ban people when they annoy you without giving them proper warnings?
I look forward to your responses. Again, I'll say that I wouldn't have a problem if there had been a proper warning (infraction), rather then just going straight for the ban hammer because I reported some posts that you didn't like. This whole thing just seems a little petty to me.