What's new

I Have A Question

Hantlers

Well-Known Member
So, I realize that I apparently annoyed you by reporting a bunch of posts. (oh the horror)

Now as I recall, that is not against the rules. Nowhere is it stated that I am not allowed to do that...and, I did not receive a warning. In fact, the closest I got to a warning was Colton saying that they would be ignored. The only other responses were from Nate, and he simply said, "a thousand ***** weren't given". Obviously he was giving off the persona that he didn't care. So is this the new behavior I should expect from the mods? Ban people when they annoy you without giving them proper warnings?

I look forward to your responses. Again, I'll say that I wouldn't have a problem if there had been a proper warning (infraction), rather then just going straight for the ban hammer because I reported some posts that you didn't like. This whole thing just seems a little petty to me.
 
So, I realize that I apparently annoyed you by reporting a bunch of posts. (oh the horror)

Now as I recall, that is not against the rules. Nowhere is it stated that I am not allowed to do that...and, I did not receive a warning. In fact, the closest I got to a warning was Colton saying that they would be ignored. The only other responses were from Nate, and he simply said, "a thousand ***** weren't given". Obviously he was giving off the persona that he didn't care. So is this the new behavior I should expect from the mods? Ban people when they annoy you without giving them proper warnings?

Your behavior clearly fell into the "trolling" category. From the Rules:

Trolling: Deliberate attempts to disrupt the usability of the boards will be considered trolling. These include (but are not limited to) comments made solely to provoke reactions, bizarre formatting of posts, extremely large images, many new threads started right after each other, signing a negative rep comment with someone else's name, etc. Depending on the severity of the trolling, the single strike policy may be enacted.

That's why you were given an infraction.

Hantlers said:
I look forward to your responses. Again, I'll say that I wouldn't have a problem if there had been a proper warning (infraction), rather then just going straight for the ban hammer because I reported some posts that you didn't like. This whole thing just seems a little petty to me.

To reply to your "Ban people when they annoy you without giving them proper warnings?" question, and this last paragraph: You were not banned, you were infracted. The suspension came because you had previous infractions, so in that sense you certainly had been previously given notice and knowing that you had multiple strikes you consequently should have been on your best behavior.
 
'Comments made solely to provoke reactions'

Now that I think of it, that seems to be a rather ambiguous term. Many reactions are good. We all understand what is meant, however

Cheers!
 
Someone please link him the backseat moderating rule? Might as well throw in the "whiny wooget" link as well.
 
Can you do a citizen fraction on someone kinda like a citizen arrest?

"Hey you, stahp. Put your hands up. This is a JFC citizen fraction."
 
I asked someone to link it to him. I didn't say anything to him. I was just trying to be helpful. You're a real pot-stirrer, aren't you, St. Stroked.
 
I asked someone to link it to him. I didn't say anything to him. I was just trying to be helpful. You're a real pot-stirrer, aren't you, St. Stroked.

Still think I should have changed my name to that.
 
I'm glad I am at least one model citizen on this board. Please pay attention and make changes accordingly.
 
Your entire trolling statement is the majority of the posters on this board. You're a joke, Colton.
 
Shouldn't you be busy intermating?

Example: Derailed the thread that I had brought back on topic. Then attacked my heritage. Trolled.

Serious question. Did my post deserve such a response? Especially from a mod no less.
 
Hantlers, at the rate you're going I'd keep your bags packed

IHateModsToteL.jpg
 
Your entire trolling statement is the majority of the posters on this board. You're a joke, Colton.

I think you mean, "Thanks for explaining why I received an infraction, and I'll try not to disrupt the usability of the board in the future".

And you're welcome.
 
Example: Derailed the thread that I had brought back on topic. Then attacked my heritage. Trolled.

Serious question. Did my post deserve such a response? Especially from a mod no less.

Yes. Anything else?
 
Top