Did you even read my post? First time since Kanter's last start that Kanter and Favors played together in the 4th. Corbin tried Marvin on Blake in the 1st half, so I don't think foul trouble explains this. Corbin went with Kanter at least in part because of matchups and quality of play.
I believe that without favors getting in foul trouble that kanter would have played his usual 15-20 minutes regardless of marvin getting killed by griffin or how good or bad kanter played.
You believe that kanter played so much because he performed well, marvin was a bad matchup, and favors got into foul trouble.... and i dont necessarily think you are wrong, i just feel that if favors doesnt get into foul trouble, then kanter plays his normal minutes.
No one knows who is right or wrong.
Its like frank said "Theres always a way to spin it."
Take burks career: Frank might say that foye, howard, bell, cj miles, etc etc were all better than burks and burks was not ready and his confidence would have been destroyed and he developed better from the bench. And he might be right.
I think that burks was better than those guys from the start, his development was hindered by dnp's, inconsistent minutes, inconsistent role, and his confidence affected by never getting the nod over a vet.
I might be right too.
no one knows for sure
What i do know for sure is that for whatever reason (right or wrong) corbin has a history of playing vets over young high draft picks and that upset alot of jazz fanz myself included