What's new
By:

enjoy your 5-6 more years of "decent" jazz team fighting for the 8th playoff spot.

fishonjazz said:
Alec is playing 27 minutes per, which are not starter minutes imo.
Click to expand...

Well, la-di-****ing-da. If you don't think those are starter minutes, then surely they must not be. The Spurs then must not have any starters, because they have no one playing more than 30.7 minutes a game. It's just 12 bench players hooping it up down there in San Antone.

Hayward is as much of a small forward as he is a shooting guard
Click to expand...

You should write a nice letter to the Jazz front office telling them that. Make sure you outline how much more expertise you have than the entire FO, who decided a few years ago that his future likely lay at the SG position and started moving his minutes that way accordingly.
 
Just to really add to this idiotic argument that 28 minutes a game isn't starter minutes. Here are some players who play 30 minutes or less. Duncan, Bosh, Hibbert, David West. Pineriders, the lot of them.
 
For some additional context, among players who have played 15+ games:

21 average 36+ minutes (less than 1 per team)
57 average 33+ minutes (just shy of 2 per team)
103 average 30+ minutes (just shy of 3.5 per team)
 
That's what im talkin bout.
30 minutes plus.

This season began and I had hopes of starting lineup of burke burks hayward favors and kanter..... and each one of them getting over 30 minutes per game.

If that would have happened then I would never complain about anything..... we could lose all our games, win em all, or be right in the middle.
But since those conditions are not even close to being met, I will continue to complain and there is nothing ya'll can do to stop me.

Enjoy
 
fishonjazz said:
That's what im talkin bout.
30 minutes plus.

This season began and I had hopes of starting lineup of burke burks hayward favors and kanter..... and each one of them getting over 30 minutes per game.

If that would have happened then I would never complain about anything..... we could lose all our games, win em all, or be right in the middle.
But since those conditions are not even close to being met, I will continue to complain and there is nothing ya'll can do to stop me.

Enjoy
Click to expand...

Couldn't have said it better. Repped.
 
fishonjazz said:
But since those conditions are not even close to being met, I will continue to complain and there is nothing ya'll can do to stop me.
Click to expand...

So, because a couple of the players from the list are playing a couple of minutes a game fewer than 30, that's "conditions are not even close to being met?"

G-d, you're an idiot.
 
JimLes said:
So, because a couple of the players from the list are playing a couple of minutes a game fewer than 30
Click to expand...

Two are not starting and two are not playing 30 minutes per game.
(Kanter at 19 minutes per in his last ten games)

So yup not even close to being met
 
Behold the mesage board of wisdom!
 
fishonjazz said:
Two are not starting and two are not playing 30 minutes per game.
(Kanter at 19 minutes per in his last ten games)

So yup not even close to being met
Click to expand...

Who cares if they're not starting? Why is starting more important than how much you play? And why is 30 the magic number which makes everything okay, but 28 makes it a failure of the season?

And Kanter was given plenty of time this year. It's his own damn fault he's doing jack all with it.

This is like saying you want Favors to average 15-10, then being pissed off because he puts up 14-11.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top