GVC
Well-Known Member
No one said anything like that.It's comical that people think if Thibodeau coached this team last season, that they'd be 30th in the league defensively.
No one said anything like that.It's comical that people think if Thibodeau coached this team last season, that they'd be 30th in the league defensively.
No one said anything like that.
Width. This is pretty common terminology. Beal has the frame to carry more weight/muscle.bigger 'frame'? Are we talking width, or length? In this case, your use of 'frame' is pretty ambiguous.
stocky maybe?
Dal has a point
Width. This is pretty common terminology. Beal has the frame to carry more weight/muscle.
Good word to use
Jesus. My initial point was that Gordo-Alec are physically overmatched as starters at the 2 and 3.Yeah honestly there is 30 different ways to describe this more aptly. GVC is just being difficult probably to struggle for some sort of moral victory or something.
Guessing you didn't read that. Par for the course.He doesn't have the frame to carry the bulk needed to defend physical wing players. Look at how solidly built Bradley Beal is. Yes, they're around the same weight, but that's largely a function of Alec's height and length.
Yeah honestly there is 30 different ways to describe this more aptly. GVC is just being difficult probably to struggle for some sort of moral victory or something.
Jesus. My initial point was that Gordo-Alec are physically overmatched as starters at the 2 and 3.
I even explained what I meant before you and fish questioned it:
Guessing you didn't read that. Par for the course.
And, again, frame size is a well understood concept. Go ahead and google it.
To gvc credit, i dont think he ever got personal or started name calling.
Then why pop into the thread at all? I explained that it was a matter of being able to carry bulk/weight/strength. Do you pride yourself on being pedantic? Willfully ignorant (since you apparently read my explanatory post)?No, I did read that-- and for the most part I agreed with it, otherwise I would have called it into question.
It's comical that people think if Thibodeau coached this team last season, that they'd be 30th in the league defensively.
Then why pop into the thread at all? I explained that it was a matter of being able to carry bulk/weight/strength. Do you pride yourself on being pedantic? Willfully ignorant (since you apparently read my explanatory post)?
Would be awesome if you actually had something substantive to contribute.
Utah was ranked 25th in offense under Corbin last season (scoring). Worth the trade off for the 30th defensive spot imo.
And Thibs ranked dead last in ppg. You want to trade a small amount of defense for even worse than 25th in offense?
This is a classic JF example of not understanding bball basics while overestimating coaching and underestimating talent/team balance. There are two sides to a basketball court -- increasing presence on one end leads to decreases on the other. Thibs isn't some god that can change this simple fact like most small market Jazz fans think he is.