You are very clearly implying that. Way to contradict your own post.
Really sad story out of Texas
- Thread starter HighlandHomie
- Start date
You are very clearly implying that. Way to contradict your own post.
Joe Bagadonuts
Well-Known Member
Dear OneBrow,
I find the experience of "communicating" with you to be a ridiculous exercise. It appears to me that you are so committed to your conclusion that you cannot see anything wrong with altering the facts to make your opinion appear to be even more justified. You play loose with the truth and you use analogies that are flawed and ridiculous.
For example, in your most recent response to me you equated misstating facts in this case with people saying their sports team won a championship before the playoffs had started. I don't even know what you are talking about with that. Who says their team won the championship before they win it? I don't know of anyone. Cheering to win the championship is not even close to the same as claiming to win the championship, BTW. So you are justifying the use of incorrect facts to support your case with an analogy that, if instances of it actually exist, is so rare that any sane sports fan who saw people behaving that way would say, "What the hell is wrong with you people?" Your previous analogy regarding the death penalty and starting a car was even more ridiculous. Because of your strange tactics there's simply no point in wasting pixels discussing things with you.
Here, though, is the bottom line. I think that racism is a legitimate problem and I think we as a society should strive to improve things. I do not know for certain what role racism played in the case we were discussing, but I think there is a good chance that it played some. I would be interested to find out the true details instead of your made up facts. Unfortunately the effort to solve these sorts of problems is being severely harmed by people who use the sorts of tactics that you and Highland Homie do to advance it. The habit of some people, like yourself, of looking at skin color and then using it as a lens through which to adjust all of the other related facts is, in my opinion, extremely racist. Goodbye.
I find the experience of "communicating" with you to be a ridiculous exercise. It appears to me that you are so committed to your conclusion that you cannot see anything wrong with altering the facts to make your opinion appear to be even more justified. You play loose with the truth and you use analogies that are flawed and ridiculous.
For example, in your most recent response to me you equated misstating facts in this case with people saying their sports team won a championship before the playoffs had started. I don't even know what you are talking about with that. Who says their team won the championship before they win it? I don't know of anyone. Cheering to win the championship is not even close to the same as claiming to win the championship, BTW. So you are justifying the use of incorrect facts to support your case with an analogy that, if instances of it actually exist, is so rare that any sane sports fan who saw people behaving that way would say, "What the hell is wrong with you people?" Your previous analogy regarding the death penalty and starting a car was even more ridiculous. Because of your strange tactics there's simply no point in wasting pixels discussing things with you.
Here, though, is the bottom line. I think that racism is a legitimate problem and I think we as a society should strive to improve things. I do not know for certain what role racism played in the case we were discussing, but I think there is a good chance that it played some. I would be interested to find out the true details instead of your made up facts. Unfortunately the effort to solve these sorts of problems is being severely harmed by people who use the sorts of tactics that you and Highland Homie do to advance it. The habit of some people, like yourself, of looking at skin color and then using it as a lens through which to adjust all of the other related facts is, in my opinion, extremely racist. Goodbye.
I thought you had boobs? Big ones.
Edit: nm. I'm thinking Pearl. Big ones.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
boobs
ya, I got boobs, big ones. Pearl's hubby has boobs too, but I have no idea of scale. Boobs are boobs. They're good for two things. . . . well, make it three at least. First they produce oxytocin as a reaction to suckling or other touch sorts of notions under appropriate circumstances. Walk up to chick you don't know, without introduction or explanation and start motorboating and I bet first you get knocked across the sidewalk and in front of oncoming traffic in the street. Second, you will be arrested and charged with rape. On the other hand, apparently, if you smile and indulge in some small talk pleasantries, deploy some discretionary funds to show you care for the woman, and properly observe facial expressions and sentiments, it can bring some positive responses. If you're a guy and you can't process such logical consequences successfully, let's just call you a candidate for the Darwin Prize. Besides oxytocin, the next product, in a time line sequence, is that boobs produce milk for babes. I love milk. I get mine from my small herd of cows now, mostly.
The third thing boobs are good for is showing intellectually marginal males who the girls are. If you're really smart, you can see some other clues and figure it out even if the boobs are relatively small. Some morons speculate that big boobs are more fun, and it is reasonable to project that since smarter males can see women whose boobs don't obscure the landscape, and probably selectively breed with smaller boob size women, women with smaller boobs are more likely to produce smarter babes. Size doesn't strongly correlate with milk production, or female breeding capacity, so my observation of inverse correlation with boob size and intelligence is likely accurate on a statistical significance level of 1.0 or larger.
I find it pretty nice to have my boobs attractively displayed by my wife, on a pretty private basis.
I am doing a statistical survey on the male response curve, respectively, to complex mental math operations, and discussions about female attractions. Vote which one you appreciate the most by rep'ing the appropriate discussion.
Thank you.
uhhhhmmmmm. . . .. back to the topic of inequities in our law enforcement and judicial systems, and jury selection methods. I think blacks should compensate for whte bigotry and prejudices by creating a positive culture around jury duty, like young pre-teen black women do with trophy babes. Make it cool to get on a jury, and pretty soon you will have juries that will no longer be so biased against blacks. . . . uhhhhhmmmmmm. . . . wait . . . . check that. That change agenda item might backfire. Lots of black women are highly critical if not downright pissed off at black men, and maybe they'd be doing a lot of retribution. . . . .
better work on the jury duty initative with the guilt-stricken white rich males. . . . .
ya, I got boobs, big ones. Pearl's hubby has boobs too, but I have no idea of scale. Boobs are boobs. They're good for two things. . . . well, make it three at least. First they produce oxytocin as a reaction to suckling or other touch sorts of notions under appropriate circumstances. Walk up to chick you don't know, without introduction or explanation and start motorboating and I bet first you get knocked across the sidewalk and in front of oncoming traffic in the street. Second, you will be arrested and charged with rape. On the other hand, apparently, if you smile and indulge in some small talk pleasantries, deploy some discretionary funds to show you care for the woman, and properly observe facial expressions and sentiments, it can bring some positive responses. If you're a guy and you can't process such logical consequences successfully, let's just call you a candidate for the Darwin Prize. Besides oxytocin, the next product, in a time line sequence, is that boobs produce milk for babes. I love milk. I get mine from my small herd of cows now, mostly.
The third thing boobs are good for is showing intellectually marginal males who the girls are. If you're really smart, you can see some other clues and figure it out even if the boobs are relatively small. Some morons speculate that big boobs are more fun, and it is reasonable to project that since smarter males can see women whose boobs don't obscure the landscape, and probably selectively breed with smaller boob size women, women with smaller boobs are more likely to produce smarter babes. Size doesn't strongly correlate with milk production, or female breeding capacity, so my observation of inverse correlation with boob size and intelligence is likely accurate on a statistical significance level of 1.0 or larger.
I find it pretty nice to have my boobs attractively displayed by my wife, on a pretty private basis.
I am doing a statistical survey on the male response curve, respectively, to complex mental math operations, and discussions about female attractions. Vote which one you appreciate the most by rep'ing the appropriate discussion.
Thank you.
uhhhhmmmmm. . . .. back to the topic of inequities in our law enforcement and judicial systems, and jury selection methods. I think blacks should compensate for whte bigotry and prejudices by creating a positive culture around jury duty, like young pre-teen black women do with trophy babes. Make it cool to get on a jury, and pretty soon you will have juries that will no longer be so biased against blacks. . . . uhhhhhmmmmmm. . . . wait . . . . check that. That change agenda item might backfire. Lots of black women are highly critical if not downright pissed off at black men, and maybe they'd be doing a lot of retribution. . . . .
better work on the jury duty initative with the guilt-stricken white rich males. . . . .
Last edited:
basis (dictionary.com):
1. the bottom or base of anything; the part on which something stands or rests.
2. anything upon which something is based; fundamental principle; groundwork.
3. the principal constituent; fundamental ingredient.
influence (dictionary.com):
1. the capacity or power of persons or things to be a compelling force on or produce effects on the actions, behavior, opinions, etc., of others: He used family influence to get the contract.
2. the action or process of producing effects on the actions, behavior, opinions, etc., of another or others: Her mother's influence made her stay.
Again, no one said it was based on racist motivations. However, racism does influence the result.
JoeBagadonuts,
I don't find your points in this conversation particularly relevant or illuminating; you've just been arguing long diversion and avoiding the serious truths. Your central theme has been saying that referring to the extremely likely outcome of a capital sentence as something that is fait accompli, before the sentence is actually handed down, is somehow so egregious that you can't ever trust HighlandHomie, as if you trusted him so much on this topic before he made that post. You are engaging in post hoc rationalizations to justify your ignoring the more serious truths here.
Also, you are accusing me of playing fast and loose with the truth, and I'll wager you can't take hold of one sentence I've made in this entire thread that does so. I've already acknowledged that the original post had hyperbole/anticipation. However, you have also distorted it into your own personal straw man, so you can dismiss it.
From the original post:
From you second response in this thread:
Now where, precisely, does HighlandHomie say that Guy has already gotten the death penalty? To any reasonable reader, HighlandHomie is making a prediction about the case, in much the same way a Spurs fan might say the Spurs will be 2014-15 champions.
I'm glad you have decided to waste no further pixels in this discussion. I would have preferred if you had mad that decision back on page 1, when you lied about what HighlandHomie wrote to make your point. You also have also lied about my making up facts.
If you are really so interested in the true details of this case, there are many articles about it on the internet. It seems that over a few days and several pages, you could not bother with a Google search, but now you are suddenly so eager to get facts? Meanwhile, you again lie about my making up facts.
So, thank you so much for your opinion. When I really want the opinion of someone who creates straw man, mischaracterizes what is said, and calls me a liar in the process, I guess I'll have to find someone else. Such a shame.