What's new
By:

So you can walk in New York with no pants or underware....

Nightmare said:
That brings the important question. Would you rather be 6'6" tall with a 4 inch penis or 5'0" tall with a 7-8 inch penis.
Click to expand...

I think 99% of the guys will pick 5'0 with 8 inch penis. Unless you dream about being NBA player. But man, 4 inch penis? That would be massively depressing.
 
AKMVP said:
I think 99% of the guys will pick 5'0 with 8 inch penis. Unless you dream about being NBA player. But man, 4 inch penis? That would be massively depressing.
Click to expand...

By the time get far enough were a girl sees your size usually the deal is already sealed. Also, you can just be a loner and chill at home and do solo sessions all the same. Just playing devils advocate here.
 
4 inch might be too small to have good sex. But I think I'd take my current height (6'4) with a 4 incher than 5'0 with an 8-incher.
 
AKMVP said:
I think 99% of the guys will pick 5'0 with 8 inch penis. Unless you dream about being NBA player. But man, 4 inch penis? That would be massively depressing.
Click to expand...

Nightmare said:
By the time get far enough were a girl sees your size usually the deal is already sealed. Also, you can just be a loner and chill at home and do solo sessions all the same. Just playing devils advocate here.
Click to expand...

Siro said:
4 inch might be too small to have good sex. But I think I'd take my current height (6'4) with a 4 incher than 5'0 with an 8-incher.
Click to expand...

Read that article!!!
 
how about if it's just painted on...


So I think the next experiment should be to have a model wearing trompe l'oeil clothing that looks like you're naked but you're not.

Then again, it reminds me of the apron my neighbor wore when he'd cook-out. It had a hand-towel hanging over the middle with a fake penis and balls underneath. He loved to have people over for cook-outs and make a "show" of wiping his sticky hands on that towel and flashing a glimpse of his plastic penis. He was probably prouder of that than the real thing.

then again, there's always the link removed

oops, looks like the contest is over, the post is from 2009!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
VINYLONE said:
Read that article!!!
Click to expand...

by the way, a micropenis is 3" or less. So at 4" you'd be considered average I guess.


AND anyone who googles "penis apron" might be amused to note that there are micropenis aprons too! They have a magnifying glass to help view the package.
 
No way I'd ever do this. After three minutes, the anxiety and temperatures would have my average penis shriveled up into a ****oris.
 
I've almost posted pics of girls wearing nothing but paint before, but I always assumed it would be an automatic fract. Nice to know it's acceptable.
 
VINYLONE said:
Did anyone else read that Micro Penis article in New York Magazine? It was pretty ****ing good and multi-faceted. I'd link to is as it's quite academic but the modstapo would surely infract me on the content.
Click to expand...

Guy I grew up with, known him since I was 2, had a MP. Basically the size of a small man's pinkey at full attention. He was about 6'2", lots of girls interested. Couldn't seem to keep a relationship going.

Even though he was a childhood friend, he was the biggest jackass I've ever spent any amount of time with. MP couldn't have happened to a nicer guy.

I still remember when he confided in me and another friend of mine that he was concerned with the size of his package. We assured him girls didn't care about stuff like that. A couple sideward glances of amusement amongst me and my other buddy to be sure. I'm pretty sure when it's that small girls do care. Again, pinkey size.
 
Gameface said:
...I'm pretty sure when it's that small girls do care. Again, pinkey size.
Click to expand...

Seems it's more of a general problem than might initially be apparent - such as the difficulty he has fishing it out of his fly when he needs to pee. Greatly prefers to sit down so he doesn't have to worry about his stream dribbling on his pants.
 
colton said:
Not necessarily.
Click to expand...

Well, the pics I'm talking about are still picks. What you see is what you see, rather than a girl moving around with no pants on. Unless it clearly showed a nipple or something, I can't see how a still pic could be worthy of a fract when this is not.
 
freakazoid said:
Well, the pics I'm talking about are still picks. What you see is what you see, rather than a girl moving around with no pants on. Unless it clearly showed a nipple or something, I can't see how a still pic could be worthy of a fract when this is not.
Click to expand...

Who said it wasn't?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top