What's new
By:
Filters

I Have A Question

LOL.. Hanters got a slap on the wrist and is crying about it like he got his head chopped off.



That's weak bro... smh.
 
Hantlers said:
So, I realize that I apparently annoyed you by reporting a bunch of posts. (oh the horror)

Now as I recall, that is not against the rules.
Click to expand...

You recalled wrong, it is, and now you're whining about it. Shocking. And you had realized it before you did it, and if you didn't you really are the dumbest idiot here (which would be a Herculean effort).
 
colton said:
Your behavior clearly fell into the "trolling" category. From the Rules:
Click to expand...

So when are ncoloradojazz and carolina jazz getting banned?

I don't really care if they get banned or not but I'm just curious since every post by them is an attempt to troll
 
Hantlers said:
So, I realize that I apparently annoyed you by reporting a bunch of posts. (oh the horror)

Now as I recall, that is not against the rules. Nowhere is it stated that I am not allowed to do that...and, I did not receive a warning. In fact, the closest I got to a warning was Colton saying that they would be ignored. The only other responses were from Nate, and he simply said, "a thousand ***** weren't given". Obviously he was giving off the persona that he didn't care. So is this the new behavior I should expect from the mods? Ban people when they annoy you without giving them proper warnings?

I look forward to your responses. Again, I'll say that I wouldn't have a problem if there had been a proper warning (infraction), rather then just going straight for the ban hammer because I reported some posts that you didn't like. This whole thing just seems a little petty to me.
Click to expand...

I think it's safe to say Hantlers is the frontrunner for JazzFanz's "Butt-Hurt Poster of the Year 2014" which was unanimously won by NAOS in 2013.
 
not worth it bro. forget the report posts button. its not worth usin. i dont use it any more at all, no matter what.
its just a trap and easy excuse for any petty mod to take out his frustrations out on u on any given day due to tiny dick syndrome.
i mean, mods havin to read lik 9 posts is obviously infrac/ban worthy! mods shouldnt have to mod. just move on bro, the sooner u realize most mods are here to hinder, not help, ur experience here--the easier this will become.
 
HeavenHarris said:
not worth it bro. forget the report posts button. its not worth usin. i dont use it any more at all, no matter what.
its just a trap and easy excuse for any petty mod to take out his frustrations out on u on any given day due to tiny dick syndrome.
i mean, mods havin to read lik 9 posts is obviously infrac/ban worthy! mods shouldnt have to mod. just move on bro, the sooner u realize most mods are here to hinder, not help, ur experience here--the easier this will become.
Click to expand...

I attribute my pettiness more to acid reflux.

#betterthanaverage

Sent from the JazzFanz app
 
EJ you miss the mark an insane amount of times for a decently cool "real life" person.


dat jazzfanz.com mobile app doe
 
I have a question as well...

First, Moe, you know you're my girl. I not only find you funny but you're probably a sexy minx in real life as well. With that said, I have a question.

So, Moe made this post:

moevillini said:
how about if it's just painted on...


So I think the next experiment should be to have a model wearing trompe l'oeil clothing that looks like you're naked but you're not.

Then again, it reminds me of the apron my neighbor wore when he'd cook-out. It had a hand-towel hanging over the middle with a fake penis and balls underneath. He loved to have people over for cook-outs and make a "show" of wiping his sticky hands on that towel and flashing a glimpse of his plastic penis. He was probably prouder of that than the real thing.

then again, there's always the "Dick" towel - and you could WIN one here:
theluxuryspot.com/win-a-dick-towel-seriously/

(linking disabled due to modstapo concerns but if you're smart enough, you'll figure it out)

oops, looks like the contest is over, the post is from 2009!
Click to expand...

In the post is a URL to a page that contains a graphic, well graphic according to this Mormonesque message board, image of a penis. Now, I know "URL links" of unsavory material are not allowed on this board. But is an un-clickable URL considered a link? If it is considered one, then, sorry, Moe probably needs an infraction issued. If it is not considered an offense, could I have theoretically posted a URL to a micro penis article in New York Magazine that had graphic descriptions in it without getting in trouble by the Modstapo?

I feel like this is kind of a grey area. I mean, Moe did "disable the link" in her post and there is nothing to figure out. Highlight that URL, right click and you can go to that page directly.
 
VINYLONE said:
I have a question as well...

First, Moe, you know you're my girl. I not only find you funny but you're probably a sexy minx in real life as well. With that said, I have a question.

So, Moe made this post:



In the post is a URL to a page that contains a graphic, well graphic according to this Mormonesque message board, image of a penis. Now, I know "URL links" of unsavory material are not allowed on this board. But is an un-clickable URL considered a link? If it is considered one, then, sorry, Moe probably needs an infraction issued. If it is not considered an offense, could I have theoretically posted a URL to a micro penis article in New York Magazine that had graphic descriptions in it without getting in trouble by the Modstapo?

I feel like this is kind of a grey area. I mean, Moe did "disable the link" in her post and there is nothing to figure out. Highlight that URL, right click and you can go to that page directly.
Click to expand...

LOL

or even ROFLMFAO at you, my dear Vinylone

<3

You complain about MY post with a disabled link to cartoon-type images of male genitalia but you have NO PROBLEM with the VIDEO in the OP that shows a real female body in all its naked glory...

was sort of expecting a complaint, but you're probably one of the last I'd expect it would come from...

Can you spell DOUBLE-STANDARD?


(guess so, since I provided such a great hint!)

:D

(oh, and the Modstapo is on it now, so don't worry... I figured it'd happen sooner or later, and was waiting to post my response until it did. XOXO)
 
moevillini said:
LOL

or even ROFLMFAO at you, my dear Vinylone

<3

You complain about MY post with a disabled link to cartoon-type images of male genitalia but you have NO PROBLEM with the VIDEO in the OP that shows a real female body in all its naked glory...

was sort of expecting a complaint, but you're probably one of the last I'd expect it would come from...

Can you spell DOUBLE-STANDARD?


(guess so, since I provided such a great hint!)

:D

(oh, and the Modstapo is on it now, so don't worry... I figured it'd happen sooner or later, and was waiting to post my response until it did. XOXO)
Click to expand...

Moe, please don't take my post in an incorrect fashion. I was not singling you out in any way. You're my homegirl. You know this. If I lived in your little town, I'd buy you a daquiri easily....or maybe an Arnold Palmer. With that said, I think you've completely missed the point of my post. My issue is not with the content of your post. If this message board belonged to me, I'd allow most stuff. We all know there are no children that peruse this board but this is the often used excuse for the heavy handedness of the modstapo.

Anyway, so to my original question. Can a unclickable URL link to banned content be posted without an infraction? This is what I am looking for claraification on. Please advise.
 
VINYLONE said:
Moe, please don't take my post in an incorrect fashion. I was not singling you out in any way. You're my homegirl. You know this. If I lived in your little town, I'd buy you a daquiri easily....or maybe an Arnold Palmer. With that said, I think you've completely missed the point of my post. My issue is not with the content of your post. If this message board belonged to me, I'd allow most stuff. We all know there are no children that peruse this board but this is the often used excuse for the heavy handedness of the modstapo.

Anyway, so to my original question. Can a unclickable URL link to banned content be posted without an infraction? This is what I am looking for claraification on. Please advise.
Click to expand...
Kids may not peruse the board on a regular basis, but that doesn't mean they don't see it. My kids are constantly peeking over my shoulder when I'm online.
 
VINYLONE said:
Anyway, so to my original question. Can a unclickable URL link to banned content be posted without an infraction? This is what I am looking for clarification on. Please advise.
Click to expand...

So, I am a little perplexed as to why my question is not getting answered by any of the modstapo crew or Jason himself. My question is a genuine one and I am truly just looking for clarification. I do have a tendency to post a lot of links to articles and such and I'd hate to get myself into an infraction pickle.

Can someone plese advise. Thank you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Top