What's new

What would world look like if only 4 degree Celsius warmer.

This is me too. I skim red (though I usually like what he says it's just too long for me to read usually), and skip almost all of dutch and boris. (I occasionally read a post if theirs)

I also mostly skip babe posts, though I don't have him on ignore.



I put Boris onto ignore when i realized every time i read a post of his my soul kindof died. Dutchjazzer is just pure comic relief. Blocked Thriller too and so glad.
 
I have seen other models that show increases in precipitation pretty much everywhere. And we know from the archaeological record that in eras of the past when we had similar levels of CO2 in the atmosphere and much higher temperatures that it was generally a wet tropical environment most everywhere. I think this is an inexact science to say the least, speculating what will happen.
 
LMAO. Well, the ECMWF, which is the most accurate model, that uses up-to-the-minute-starting conditions, dozens of variables, and a supercomputer cluster that runs it all, is projecting landfall near Miami.

Now I'm not saying that the most accurate model is more reliable than your eyeballing the ocean currents, but it is something to keep in mind.

Well, if you thought I said "Ocean" currents, maybe you should adjust your "meds"/blend a bit. Jet stream, cold fronts, are standard atmospheric weather forcasts considerations.

The site I linked presents several theoretical model projections. As a rule they do pretty good, but I've been watching this stuff for decades, and I'm just as good as they are. Sometimes better.

The professional models a few months ago were projecting the development of an El Nino in the Pacific, which for some fairly logical reasonings is generally considered a factor in suppressing Atlantic hurricanes. But my "eyeballs" on the ocean surface temp maps shows cold water upwelling in the stretch where El Nino is hatched by warmer surface waters, meaning La Nina and more Atlantic hurricanes historically and logically. And sure enough....

We've had El Nino for two years, a resurgence for a third year would be an anomaly. But they're still looking for it. My eyeballs on the maps also see a large warm surface anomaly north of the Hawaiian Islands going back towards Japan, which means the northern storm stream will likely be quite productive, as long as the salt-driven mixing currents stay in that pattern. I think that's part of the professional calculations in regard to El Nino, maybe. But technically, I would make a distinction. El Nino in my mind requires a low-latitude jet prevailing, and the part of the ocean that is showing warm is supporting a higher-latitude jet.

Since yesterday, the professionals have moved their projections further west, with the course right up the middle of Florida and on to Kentucky.

The cold front and jet has shifter further south and east, and could actually just move right on out to sea, strengthening the westward projections, maybe moving Irma clear off the west Florida coast. That would be the worst of all possible worlds, really, with the Gulf waters as warm as they are. An Irma on Katrina's path.

A further consideration is the solar storm that's hitting us. There was a solar event like this that some believe did the magic on Katrina to make it suddenly strengthen.

I generally treat my notions/projections as speculative and keep an eye out to see if it working out the way I thought or not. Nobody should rely on my "forecasts" and decide to sit out Irma because it's gonna miss Florida, for sure. Hope Peeks' Place is secured.
 
I have seen other models that show increases in precipitation pretty much everywhere. And we know from the archaeological record that in eras of the past when we had similar levels of CO2 in the atmosphere and much higher temperatures that it was generally a wet tropical environment most everywhere. I think this is an inexact science to say the least, speculating what will happen.

Most "models" don't tabulate the data and equations used, or admit all the "fudge factors" thrown in. In gross mass terms, warmer air can carry more water. warmer temps support more mass transport of water over the mountains or up into the Arctic. So I'm sure you're right.

Geologists call the first limestone deposits "Pre=Cambrian" because there's no fossils or anything living. Pure chemical Ca/Mg Carbonate, caused by the reaction of carbon dioxide with oxides in solution in the sea.
Before Life. We had so much carbon dioxide in our atmosphere we woulda hafta' a had gas masks and oxygen tanks to walk around in it.

But a funny thing happened. Photosynthesis was "invented" somehow. Almost all our oxygen had been consumed in making oxides of metals in the hot origins of Earth, but now, with things cooler, there would be oxygen in the air again through photosynthesis.

We had a lot of geologic ages where fossils and fuels were left in the muck as limestone layers grew rapidly. In Utah, the combined thickness of carbonate rock deposits is over 10000 feet, now substantially eroded to fill the valleys with rock and muck, with a little clay on the surface..... all that tonnage was air pressure once.. . . so we woulda' needed a diving suit to walk depressurized around in all that co2.

warming oceans outgas CO2 enough to sustain a claim by some that our rising CO2 is from warming the ocean...... Clearly, there were cycles in co2 before Man.

So anyway, yah. We had a greenhouse Earth with rainforests above the Arctic/Anarctic circles. Yep, there will be immense gas, oil, and coal deposits to be found in Antarctica.

dunno about others, but greenhouse conditions are good for life as I like it.
 
Well, if you thought I said "Ocean" currents, maybe you should adjust your "meds"/blend a bit. Jet stream, cold fronts, are standard atmospheric weather forcasts considerations.

The site I linked presents several theoretical model projections. As a rule they do pretty good, but I've been watching this stuff for decades, and I'm just as good as they are. Sometimes better.

The professional models a few months ago were projecting the development of an El Nino in the Pacific, which for some fairly logical reasonings is generally considered a factor in suppressing Atlantic hurricanes. But my "eyeballs" on the ocean surface temp maps shows cold water upwelling in the stretch where El Nino is hatched by warmer surface waters, meaning La Nina and more Atlantic hurricanes historically and logically. And sure enough....

We've had El Nino for two years, a resurgence for a third year would be an anomaly. But they're still looking for it. My eyeballs on the maps also see a large warm surface anomaly north of the Hawaiian Islands going back towards Japan, which means the northern storm stream will likely be quite productive, as long as the salt-driven mixing currents stay in that pattern. I think that's part of the professional calculations in regard to El Nino, maybe. But technically, I would make a distinction. El Nino in my mind requires a low-latitude jet prevailing, and the part of the ocean that is showing warm is supporting a higher-latitude jet.

Since yesterday, the professionals have moved their projections further west, with the course right up the middle of Florida and on to Kentucky.

The cold front and jet has shifter further south and east, and could actually just move right on out to sea, strengthening the westward projections, maybe moving Irma clear off the west Florida coast. That would be the worst of all possible worlds, really, with the Gulf waters as warm as they are. An Irma on Katrina's path.

A further consideration is the solar storm that's hitting us. There was a solar event like this that some believe did the magic on Katrina to make it suddenly strengthen.

I generally treat my notions/projections as speculative and keep an eye out to see if it working out the way I thought or not. Nobody should rely on my "forecasts" and decide to sit out Irma because it's gonna miss Florida, for sure. Hope Peeks' Place is secured.

So...you're just making **** up now. It's one thing to have a radical interpretation of reality but it's another to supplant reality with your fantasies.

Colorado State University hurricane researchers continue to predict an above-average Atlantic hurricane season. They cite both neutral El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) conditions and a warmer than normal tropical Atlantic as the primary reasons for this above-average prediction.
https://source.colostate.edu/forecast-team-continues-predict-average-2017-atlantic-hurricane-season/
 
[MENTION=970]babe[/MENTION]

GJ with those weather predictions for the first week of September that you shared at the beginning of the 2nd week in September.

U so smert
 
So...you're just making **** up now. It's one thing to have a radical interpretation of reality but it's another to supplant reality with your fantasies.


https://source.colostate.edu/forecast-team-continues-predict-average-2017-atlantic-hurricane-season/

As recently as May, the official ENSO prognostication was leaning towards El Nino, then they began to talk about "delay of ENSO development", while they went from ENSO positive to ENSO neutral. Damn professionals start pulling their wrong prognostications pretty quick when they're wrong.

My eyeballs on the surface temp maps see a lot of dark blue where they thought it was going to go red. I saw the first blue dots surfacing in May, began questioning the prediction then.

you're not very smart when you're just hostile to someone who has stated a fact.

My comments are relative to the latest predictions and models. So the "cold front" stretched across the Gulf of Mexico will have it's strongest "steering winds" on it's southeast quadrant. Yesterday that was over northern Florida as I said yesterday. Today it has moved way out into the Atlantic. A slight warm front has developed in the central Gulf south of LA which is opening things up for a more westerly course.

The professional models today have indeed moved the highest probable course westward about forty miles since yesterday. It does look like those prospects for steering winds turning Irma are less of factor today. Pretty sure the mathematical models look for signs of changes like these maybe a little better than my eyeballs can see from satellite pics. No doubt they saw the front moving by more than I thought, but didn't think it would move so far as it has by now. I was thinking it could just stay right there sorta like the front that trapped Harvey.

No, the models don't predict any slowing for Irma, and now predict significant weakening while it moves through FL and end it's storm status in Kentucky.
 
latest sat pics show the Irma outer fringes encountering sheering winds. Irma has dropped to 155 mph.
 
You gotta know when to hold em
Know when to fold em
Know when to walk away
Know when to SHUT THE **** UP

Better to be silent an thought a fool then to speak out an remove all doubt.

In JFC land, the libs believe everyone else are fools and have no doubts whatsoever about it. Just being here without proper lib credentials proves I'm willing to be thought a fool, though I'm less willing to just be a deliberate annoyance to the high priests of political prophesy than some "fools".

I don't credit their opinions with any authority at all. Let the record show, I said stuff that was right, despite their disbelief and credulity relying on corporate mainstream tools of public management for the fascist racist/racebaiting/America-demonizing/warmongering owners of our media, who never thought Trump had a chance to win and who still won't let the voters just have the pres they voted for....
 
So, anyway, checking again for the latest 3hr information update on Irma, the latest movement veered a bit northward in passing the remnant of the front that looked to be a factor yesterday, but Irma is now thought to be heading directly west heading close to the Cuban north shores, and is thought to begin heading north, almost direct north into the Florida keys, over the everglades and up the center of Florida. It has weakened another 5 mph and is now a cat 4, but is not expected to weaken further since the sheering winds will lessen as the front I was looking at just falls apart entirely.

eyeball forecasts at least have some advantage for open eyes seeing the changes in the environment in real time....profession forecasters and model makers just have to keep updating every few hours too. The various models in wunderground are pretty tight, but they still had one taking Irma just east of Miami and up to South Carolina for the first actual landfall. The most westwardly model takes it over the keys and to landfall in the FL panhandle.

So if I yap about the sitch and say stuff those outlier models say, I'm just giving the range of probabilities the professionals themselves are thinking about.
 
I think it'll look something like this

Planet-Earth.jpg
 
You gotta be in the extreme minority. Every other post anymore is a response to Dutch.
True enough. It would be hard to follow conversations if I didn't already have a pretty good idea what Dutch was likely to say.
 
I have a Canadian friend that always talks about if the breadbasket continues to shift north and extend to Canada it might make Canada have a larger influence on the world and become sort of a superpower. Is this likely to happen in our lifetime or our children's and grandchildren's lifetimes? 4 degrees Celsius seems like quite a bit.
 
Rush told me a few days ago that hurricanes and climate change is fake news.

Alex jones told me that the Feds have ray guns that can kill hurricanes.
 
I have a Canadian friend that always talks about if the breadbasket continues to shift north and extend to Canada it might make Canada have a larger influence on the world and become sort of a superpower. Is this likely to happen in our lifetime or our children's and grandchildren's lifetimes? 4 degrees Celsius seems like quite a bit.

I want to live near banff if that's the case. Canada is just so beautiful.
 
Rush told me a few days ago that hurricanes and climate change is fake news.

Alex jones told me that the Feds have ray guns that can kill hurricanes.

Search Keywords or URLs

What's New
Hot 50
Fact Check
News
Video
Archive
About
FAQ
Contact
Random

Report Advertisement
Fact Check Hurricane Katrina
Hurricane Irma: What's True and What's False
Hurricane Irma has prompted the showering of social media with rumors, astonishing photographs, and other questionable claims.
NOAA/NASA Goddard MODIS Rapid Response Team
144

Report Advertisement
CLAIM
An assortment of rumors associated with Hurricane Irma in September 2017.

RATING
MIXTURE
ORIGIN
Hurricane Irma was the second major hurricane of the 2017 Atlantic hurricane season (after Hurricane Harvey), and the storm brought with it dire predictions that prompted mass evacuations, widespread preparedness activity, and strongly-worded warnings:

Whether it will actually endure a storm of that size and violence isn’t clear. As of Friday morning, Hurricane Irma, one of the strongest hurricanes ever measured in the Atlantic Ocean, was predicted to tear through South Florida and up the center of the state. If forecasts hold, it could be the most ferocious storm seen in the Sunshine State since Hurricane Andrew cut east-to-west across its peninsula a quarter-century ago.

“Irma has me sick to my stomach,” said Eric Blake, a scientist with the National Hurricane Center, on his personal Twitter account on Thursday evening. “This hurricane is as serious as any I have seen. No hype, just the hard facts. Take every lifesaving precaution you can.”

“I have little doubt Irma will go down as one of the most infamous in Atlantic hurricane history,” he added.
As is typically the case with events that can produce widespread damage and destruction, news about Hurricane Irma has been peppered with misinformation, hoaxes, and images of dubious veracity, prompting us to compile some of the most frequently asked reader questions about that potentially devastating weather phenomenon:

Q: Did FEMA push through a law forcing all hotels and motels to accept all pets during hurricane evacuations?

A: No. Disabled persons who utilize service animals are excluded from hotel and motel “pet policies” under the Americans with Disabilities Act, but that policy applies irrespective of weather conditions. More information about this claim is available here.

Q: Is the dishwasher a good place to store valuables during a hurricane?

A: The short answer is no, a dishwasher is not an especially safe place in which to secure valuables and keepsakes during a hurricane. The longer answer is available here.

Q: Did airlines begin price-gouging evacuees as Irma approached?

A: Online listings for some airlines initially showed very high prices for flights out of Florida during the approach of Hurricane Irma, but some airlines also later instituted price caps to ensure reasonable and affordable fares for those needing to get out of the state before the storm.

Q: Does a popular video depict Hurricane Irma battering Antigua and Barbuda?

A: No, the storm footage seen in a widely circulated video was actually captured in Uruguay in 2016.

Q: Did Hurricane Irma pick up “sharks” as it developed?

A: A: No. A news chyron seemingly reporting this information was in fact the product of a build-your-own-prank site.

Q: Did the governor of the Virgin Islands empower the National Guard to seize weapons and other property in response to Irma?

A: Governor Kenneth Mapp did issue an executive order that does authorize the National Guard to seize firearms and other property if he deems it necessary to keep public order.

Q: Did the 2005 film Category 7: The End of the World feature hurricanes named Harvey and Irma, revealing a conspiracy of weather manipulation?

A: No. The details claimed about that movie in a popular viral rumor were all inaccurate.

Q: Is Hurricane Irma the first “Category 6” storm?

A: No, Despite some putative discussion on the subject, the classification of a Category 6 storm does not exist.

Q: Did right-wing talk radio host Rush Limbaugh call Irma a “liberal hoax,” and then quietly evacuate Florida himself?

No. As the Washington Post reported in an article critical of Limbaugh, the talk radio host accused the news media of exaggerating weather-related dangers but did not suggest Hurricane Irma itself was a hoax.

http://www.snopes.com/hurricane-irma-faq/

Get educated.
 

Seriously *** wipe?

I was using satire. But What he actually said wasn't any better. Are you really trying to defend Rush?

"Rush Limbaugh didn't say the magic words, but on Tuesday he basically accused the media of creating fake news about Hurricane Irma, which is threatening*Florida after hittingBarbuda and Antigua. The storm's 185-mile-per-hour winds tied the record high for any Atlantic hurricane making landfall.

“These storms, once they actually hit, are never as strong as they're reported,” Limbaugh claimed on his syndicated radio show. He added that “the graphics have been created to make it look like the ocean's having an exorcism, just getting rid of the devil here in the form of this hurricane, this bright red stuff.”

...Alex Jones might have something to do with it. The Infowars founder — who has an “amazing” reputation, according to Trump — has for years promoted the notion that the U.S. government possesses the power to conjure and control weather events. Just last week, as Hurricane Harvey battered Texas, Jones devoted part of his show to questioning why the government didn't “use the technologies to kill [the storm] out in the gulf.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ane-irma-is-fake-news/?utm_term=.1c9145b854f7
 
Top