What's new

The official "let's impeach Trump" thread

One Elie Mystal of The Nation pulls no punches...


“Trump and his administration should be treated like mass murderers. Vanity Fair reports that Jared Kushner may have decided to scuttle a national testing plan because the deaths were, at the time, heavily skewed towards “blue” states with Democratic governors. If true, that behavior should be viewed as a crime against humanity. No, it is not the killing fields; it is not the Armenian genocide; it’s not the gulag or any number of recent horrors of history. But I would argue that it could meet all three elements required to go before the International Criminal Court: It’s persecution against an identifiable group, as well as an inhumane act “intentionally causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health”; it’s a systemic “attack” against a civilian population; and it’s done with knowledge of the attack.“


“But the effort ran headlong into shifting sentiment at the White House. Trusting his vaunted political instincts, President Trump had been downplaying concerns about the virus and spreading misinformation about it—efforts that were soon amplified by Republican elected officials and right-wing media figures. Worried about the stock market and his reelection prospects, Trump also feared that more testing would only lead to higher case counts and more bad publicity. Meanwhile, Dr. Deborah Birx, the White House’s coronavirus response coordinator, was reportedly sharing models with senior staff that optimistically—and erroneously, it would turn out—predicted the virus would soon fade away.

Against that background, the prospect of launching a large-scale national plan was losing favor, said one public health expert in frequent contact with the White House’s official coronavirus task force.

Most troubling of all, perhaps, was a sentiment the expert said a member of Kushner’s team expressed: that because the virus had hit blue states hardest, a national plan was unnecessary and would not make sense politically. “The political folks believed that because it was going to be relegated to Democratic states, that they could blame those governors, and that would be an effective political strategy,” said the expert..
 
Including my family and the vast majority of everyone I know. I've tried and failed to change minds.

I know the feeling. At the same time, I am presently engaged in conversation with a man, much younger than myself, who is very much conservative in sentiment/philosophy. He asked me recently something that another friend had also asked, in so many words: how can two intelligent people, interpret current events in such starkly different ways? From the moment I met this young man, I felt a connection, a feeling that I should know this man, that our friendship was “meant to be”. It has been difficult hearing him express views that I find so misguided. We have both had to actually caution each other not to let our political differences affect our friendship. But, here’s the thing, we both understand that the partisanship besetting our nation must somehow lead to a healing, that things cannot continue on their present trajectory. It is with people like this that I wish to work to build bridges. There are people close to me, in one case as close as any human being has ever been to me, whose minds I cannot change. It hurts, because they are so very close. You are not alone. I am sure there are many in your very position. Sometimes all we can do is just be grateful that we have eyes to see, and ears to hear, and simply hope for the best for our “fallen” loved ones.
 
Why what? Why are they voting for Trump? Why have I tried to change their minds?

Sent from my moto z3 using JazzFanz mobile app

Why vote for Trump? Unless they’re mostly tribal and just disengaged with reality by addiction to Fox News, why would you re-elect the guy? As if Russian collusion, child separation, Ukrainian blackmail, overwhelming corruption and incompetence, and anti-democratic behavior wasn’t enough, now you have a pathetic pandemic response and worst economy since the GreatDepression.

People usually ask if their lives are better now than they were 4 years ago. How many people can legitimately say their lives are better now than under Obama in 2016? I didn’t have to worry about my life back then. I didn’t worry about budget cuts. I didn’t have to worry that I might join the 30+ million unemployed. I didn’t have to worry about paying a mortgage or if the president might start a war because their leader tweeted something about him. I didn’t worry about the president not reading his daily briefings or if his AG might crack down on educators.

So who is this 2020 version of America better for? We’re talking about a tiny crowd. I can definitely see how the billionaire class of the Kochs, Mercers, Trumps, and far right wing Christian fundamentalists Think this is better. Is your family part of that tiny crowd? Or are they just that disengaged, tribal, and otherwise brainwashed in the right wing fake reality bubble?

One last thing, we make up only 4 percent of the world’s population. Yet make up nearly 25 percent of the covid fatalities. In response to so much death, Donald says, “it is what it is.”

And this idiot wants 4 more years? And your family wants to give him those? My goodness. He literally could murder someone in broad daylight on 5th Avenue and not lose his diehard supporters.
 
Last edited:
I wish I understood why my family votes for Trump. My mother because she is a diehard Republican and believes her god is as well. She is also rather racist and agrees with the garbage he says along those lines. And she doesn't believe the things people say about him. Democrats are evil and liars. And she thinks Melania is beautiful.

My brother loves Trump because Trump gets to act in all the ways that my brother wishes he could. And the reduced business regulations have been good for him. His wife is much more liberal but has chosen to keep silent for the most part.

My sister because she thinks all minorities are a drain on the welfare system and Democrats want to give all of these people a handout, one that white people don't get. She and her husband, and their children as well, also haven't met a conspiracy they don't like.

My other sister and her husband are the only logical ones in the bunch and although they are Republicans, they do not like Trump and what he has done to our country. But I doubt they would ever vote for Biden either. Don't know what they will do this time (they voted for Macmillan last time).

I love my family, but honestly would not pick most of them to be in my life if I was not related.
 
I wish I understood why my family votes for Trump. My mother because she is a diehard Republican and believes her god is as well. She is also rather racist and agrees with the garbage he says along those lines. And she doesn't believe the things people say about him. Democrats are evil and liars. And she thinks Melania is beautiful.

My brother loves Trump because Trump gets to act in all the ways that my brother wishes he could. And the reduced business regulations have been good for him. His wife is much more liberal but has chosen to keep silent for the most part.

My sister because she thinks all minorities are a drain on the welfare system and Democrats want to give all of these people a handout, one that white people don't get. She and her husband, and their children as well, also haven't met a conspiracy they don't like.

My other sister and her husband are the only logical ones in the bunch and although they are Republicans, they do not like Trump and what he has done to our country. But I doubt they would ever vote for Biden either. Don't know what they will do this time (they voted for Macmillan last time).

I love my family, but honestly would not pick most of them to be in my life if I was not related.

Interesting. Thanks for your post.

It’s interesting how racism and misogyny play such a prominent role in Trumpism. Researcher Karen Stenner has some interesting information about this. Essentially, one third of the population has an authoritarian predisposition. These people are into racism and misogyny. When they see the world changing too fast to make them comfortable, they lash out and make democracy almost impossible to function.

So the trick is, how do you pacify them while continuously educating the rest of society about tolerance and progress so democracy can function somewhat smoothly (at the very least)? I mean, we have actual issues that need to be solved. But as long as 30-40 percent of the population support Trump, reject experts, and make democracy impossible, we can’t solve them. Even before the pandemic, look at how few actual legislators I’ve accomplishments Trump and the GOP had.

Here’s her article.
https://psmag.com/news/authoritarianism-the-terrifying-trait-that-trump-triggers
 


To which Trump added his signature characteristic, not endemic to conservatives, but certainly endemic to Trumpism:


“The cruelty of the Trump administration’s policies, and the ritual rhetorical flaying of his targets before his supporters, are intimately connected. As Lili Loofbourow wrote of the Kavanaugh incident in Slate, adolescent male cruelty toward women is a bonding mechanism, a vehicle for intimacy through contempt. The white men in the lynching photos are smiling not merely because of what they have done, but because they have done it together.

We can hear the spectacle of cruel laughter throughout the Trump era. There were the border-patrol agents cracking up at the crying immigrant children separated from their families, and the Trump adviser who delighted white supremacists when he mocked a child with Down syndrome who was separated from her mother. There were the police who laughed uproariously when the president encouraged them to abuse suspects, and the Fox News hosts mocking a survivor of the Pulse Nightclub massacre (and in the process inundating him with threats), the survivors of sexual assault protesting to Senator Jeff Flake, the women who said the president had sexually assaulted them, and the teen survivors of the Parkland school shooting. There was the president mocking Puerto Rican accents shortly after thousands were killed and tens of thousands displaced by Hurricane Maria, the black athletes protesting unjustified killings by the police, the women of the #MeToo movement who have come forward with stories of sexual abuse, and the disabled reporter whose crime was reporting on Trump truthfully. It is not just that the perpetrators of this cruelty enjoy it; it is that they enjoy it with one another. Their shared laughter at the suffering of others is an adhesive that binds them to one another, and to Trump.”
 
Last edited:
This article is pretty incredible. There is a major divide between Christian religious beliefs and teachings vs what white American Christians believe are Christian beliefs and teachings. It’s like many of them have a perverse sense of what it actually means to be a good conservative Christian. Hint, it shouldn’t mean being a bigot, deadbeat dad, or obsessed with guns.


 
This article is pretty incredible. There is a major divide between Christian religious beliefs and teachings vs what white American Christians believe are Christian beliefs and teachings. It’s like many of them have a perverse sense of what it actually means to be a good conservative Christian. Hint, it shouldn’t mean being a bigot, deadbeat dad, or obsessed with guns.




You might also find this three part look at Trump and Christian Nationalism enlightening. It’s from a few years ago, and it’s likely I posted it to one of the Trump threads at the time it was published.

 
One Elie Mystal of The Nation pulls no punches...


“Trump and his administration should be treated like mass murderers. Vanity Fair reports that Jared Kushner may have decided to scuttle a national testing plan because the deaths were, at the time, heavily skewed towards “blue” states with Democratic governors. If true, that behavior should be viewed as a crime against humanity. No, it is not the killing fields; it is not the Armenian genocide; it’s not the gulag or any number of recent horrors of history. But I would argue that it could meet all three elements required to go before the International Criminal Court: It’s persecution against an identifiable group, as well as an inhumane act “intentionally causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health”; it’s a systemic “attack” against a civilian population; and it’s done with knowledge of the attack.“


“But the effort ran headlong into shifting sentiment at the White House. Trusting his vaunted political instincts, President Trump had been downplaying concerns about the virus and spreading misinformation about it—efforts that were soon amplified by Republican elected officials and right-wing media figures. Worried about the stock market and his reelection prospects, Trump also feared that more testing would only lead to higher case counts and more bad publicity. Meanwhile, Dr. Deborah Birx, the White House’s coronavirus response coordinator, was reportedly sharing models with senior staff that optimistically—and erroneously, it would turn out—predicted the virus would soon fade away.

Against that background, the prospect of launching a large-scale national plan was losing favor, said one public health expert in frequent contact with the White House’s official coronavirus task force.

Most troubling of all, perhaps, was a sentiment the expert said a member of Kushner’s team expressed: that because the virus had hit blue states hardest, a national plan was unnecessary and would not make sense politically. “The political folks believed that because it was going to be relegated to Democratic states, that they could blame those governors, and that would be an effective political strategy,” said the expert..
Is there actual evidence of this claim that the article is making or is this yet another example of some so-called journalist dreaming up the worst possible motive that Trump might have theoretically had and then ascribing it to him as if it is fact?
 
Is there actual evidence of this claim that the article is making or is this yet another example of some so-called journalist dreaming up the worst possible motive that Trump might have theoretically had and then ascribing it to him as if it is fact?

I’ve been following along since January, and have come to my own conclusions. You may do the same, based on what you have learned to date.
 
Is there actual evidence of this claim that the article is making or is this yet another example of some so-called journalist dreaming up the worst possible motive that Trump might have theoretically had and then ascribing it to him as if it is fact?

I have been of the belief, long held, that a person can learn a great deal about him or herself when seeing oneself through the eyes of another. In like vein, I believe a nation, a people, can learn much about themselves when seen through the eyes of others. With that possibility in mind, here is how some Europeans see America at this time in our history:


“Don’t they care about their health?” a mask-clad Patrizia Antonini asked about people in the United States as she walked with friends along the banks of Lake Bracciano, north of Rome. “They need to take our precautions. ... They need a real lockdown.”

“We Italians always saw America as a model,” said Massimo Franco, a columnist with daily Corriere della Sera. “But with this virus we’ve discovered a country that is very fragile, with bad infrastructure and a public health system that is nonexistent.”

Now, if one wishes to point out “but Italy was an epicenter!”, well, not now. Now they are a model. What is the US a model of? How right wing neofascist populism can politicize the response a nation chooses in a pandemic? How the rise and triumph of conspiracism can kneecap a nation’s response to a national health crisis? With that conspiracism led, full throttle, by the nation’s chief executive?

Of course, millions of Americans, myself included, are feeling exactly as this American doctor quoted below feels. A virus does not recognize state borders, nor does federalism mean we are 50 100% independent nations, with no need of a concerted coordinated response from the federal government. It is not asking too much, indeed it is asking what should be expected, to have a president willing, and able, to rally all of his countrymen in a time of national crisis. Has Trump rallied his countrymen to take this virus seriously, from the get-go, and at all times, in every one of his tweets and press conferences? I’ll leave it to each to answer that question. Myself, I agree with the statement by this American doctor:

“Dr. David Ho, director of the Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center at Columbia University Irving Medical Center, who is leading a team seeking treatments for COVID-19, decried such behavior, as well as the country’s handling of the virus.

“There’s no national strategy, no national leadership, and there’s no urging for the public to act in unison and carry out the measures together,” he said. “That’s what it takes, and we have completely abandoned that as a nation.”

Yes, I believe we have. I have seen no consistent effort by Donald Trump to “urge the public to act in unison and carry out the measures together”. I want a leader who speaks to ALL Americans, and shows his mettle in a time of national crisis.
 
Last edited:
Top