Safetydan
Well-Known Member
The FBI maintaining an image of competence and trust absolutely does matter.
Does it though? I've never assumed they were competent or trustworthy.
The FBI maintaining an image of competence and trust absolutely does matter.
Given statements like the one Wray made, I can't fault you, but I can hope for better.Does it though? I've never assumed they were competent or trustworthy.
Given statements like the one Wray made, I can't fault you, but I can hope for better.
No, it doesn’t change anything. As for does it matter, just a small factual detail. And not known for sure which it was as yet. Couple of things that stood out to me, when listening to the FBI director was that the shooter googled how far was Oswald from JFK, and that particular detail. But no, if it’s the case, it’s a minor detail in the historic record of the event.Does it matter? It doesn't change anything about what happened.
No kidding? The image of the bullet flying past was the first think I thought of. But I’m not Director Wray, and I have no way of knowing why he felt uncertainty about that detail. I just thought it was an interesting detail from his hearing, along with other things he mentioned. Instead of pointing out the obvious to me, I’ve seen that image, you would be better off asking Director Wray. Don’t you think?Sure. Why wouldn't the FBI not know. It is not like a NY Times photographer caught an image of the bullet in flight. Oh, wait....
![]()
Are you in the position that you know every single bit of information upon which Wray would base his statement that it’s still unknown whether shrapnel or bullet?Bullet versus shrapnel doesn't matter to the situation. The FBI maintaining an image of competence and trust absolutely does matter. When the director makes a public statement in the face of conclusive evidence already in the public domain, especially when it doesn't alter the situation, that is not a good thing.
Agree 100%It seems very plausible that a blurry streak whizzing by Trump could be either a bullet or a piece of shrapnel.
Agree 100%
And in either case some dude shot at and tried to kill trump.
Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
I don't know about you but for me to have closure it is absolutely critical that we know if it was a bullet, or just shrapnel. I mean, that changes ****ing everything. EVERYTHING!!Still trying to get over it.
Right, but as seen in this thread, Wray could also have been conspiring. Everyone in the Deep State conspires. It’s just a thing the Deep State does. According to the conspiracists who keep a close eye on Deep State shenanigans. If it weren’t for conspiracy-monitors, and their willingness to monitor the Deep State, where would we be?It seems very plausible that a blurry streak whizzing by Trump could be either a bullet or a piece of shrapnel.
This is actually one of the best known individuals suffering from TDS. Those who oppose Trump, far from exhibiting TDS, are the Americans who recognize a divisive individual who hates his country and wishes great harm upon the body politic. Apparently many confuse such enlightened individuals with the true “victims”of TDS. Here is the best known such individual:“As somebody who lived with chronic TDS, Trump Derangement Syndrome for most of my early adulthood, I wanna share with you guys how I overcame my TDS and became a freethinker: