What's new
By:

2 Solutions We Have On Our Roster Right Now

Saint Cy of JFC said:
I mean, I'm a Bradley supporter, but he in no way "deserves to play" over Ed Davis.
Click to expand...

As much as you try and paint a picture of this being subjective, you need to stop now. It is not a subjective opinion that Bradley has played better. It is objective fact.

Stop this, just stop.
 
Dali said:
As much as you try and paint a picture of this being subjective, you need to stop now. It is not a subjective opinion that Bradley has played better. It is objective fact.

Stop this, just stop.
Click to expand...
So a handful sample size overtakes recent history?
 
Dali said:
He is a very good shooter. I saw some of the comments from others that tried to play down his shooting prowess. Him not being a good shooter is just flat out false.

Like you said, he's also the 10th man and how much can you expect from a 10th man? But we have to draw the line somewhere, with the players that played. I'm going to construct a sentence below, to describe yesterdays game, and performance.

The bench put the game at serious risk of losing it, by being outscored 52-12, to a Warriors bench of the actual Warriors bench, in our own building. I don't believe that this is the game where you can paint a positive picture out of the bench's performance, including Niang. I could give you other matches where you would have much more of a point, where he is actually worthy of praise. We cannot let this sort of performance-acceptance to enter our line of thinking.
Click to expand...

Niang played well. Sorry.
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
So a handful sample size overtakes recent history?
Click to expand...

If Ed is that type of dude that will revert back to his good play of his previous years, then he will organically rip the backup role to Rudy out of Bradley's hands. Are we that allergic to competition for places at the club? If Davis wants it, go get it. Also, what's wrong with playing Bradley whilst he was a little bit on a purple patch, and then when/if Ed takes it from him, we go with Ed?
 
Dali said:
If Ed is that type of dude that will revert back to his good play of his previous years, then he will organically rip the backup role to Rudy out of Bradley's hands. Are we that allergic to competition for places at the club? If Davis wants it, go get it. Also, what's wrong with playing Bradley whilst he was a little bit on a purple patch, and then when/if Ed takes it from him, we go with Ed?
Click to expand...
Im sure the competition takes place in practice.
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
Im sure the competition takes place in practice.
Click to expand...

giphy.gif


You've voluntarily entered yourself into complete meme territory. Congratulations.
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
I mean, I'm a Bradley supporter, but he in no way "deserves to play" over Ed Davis.
Click to expand...

If Quin is going to stick with Green/Niang at the forward spots then there's no reason to play Davis over Bradley.

The ONLY reason to play a Green/Niang forward combination is for spacing. The reason you want spacing is so that you can get either a good three point look or an easy finish. Davis is not a finisher at the rim. Bradley is, it's one of his strengths.

Furthermore, Green and Niang are such an abysmal combination on the glass that it's negating the value of Davis as a rebounder. At 6'9 225 he can't outfight 3 other bigs by himself for boards. Bradley eats glass with his size. He's bigger than most out there.

That Davis/Green/Niang trio just doesn't work at very fundamental levels. Time for changes.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top