What's new

2 Solutions We Have On Our Roster Right Now

Yeah because watching Ed Davis has really sucked and I wasnt a fan of the signing in the 1st place, but when you sit down and really think about it, taking the stance that Bradley should play over Ed is crazy.

I've sat down and thought about it. You create a good, competitive environment if you make it clear that the bench spots are up for grabs. It sends a good healthy message to our young and aspiring, developing players. Believe me when I say that a player can get disheartened if they've played well, trained well, to only lose their spot again.
 
I've sat down and thought about it. You create a good, competitive environment if you make it clear that the bench spots are up for grabs. It sends a good healthy message to our young and aspiring, developing players. Believe me when I say that a player can get disheartened if they've played well, trained well, to only lose their spot again.

That's tough ****. I really don't care if Tony Bradley gets disheartened because he isnt playing over a proven NBA vet who just came off one of his better NBA seasons.

You play who is better. Unless you think Davis has suddenly become much much worse offensively over the course of an off-season, then you keep playing him. Even with him sucking a load of ***, he still has decent rebounding numbers and excellent advanced defensive metrics.

So why are we trying to replace a guy who can provide good level specialty play like Davis? The answer needs to be getting an additional offensive wing or guard who will open up the floor and make plays for guys like Davis. That might simply just be Conley getting healthy and playing with the 2nd unit more.
 
It’s getting lonely here on...

121207938-prince-edward-island-with-a-maple-leaf-hand-drawn-lettering-of-canada-s-province-for-tourist-signs-t.jpg


That’s okay. I’m not one for company.
 
That's tough ****. I really don't care if Tony Bradley gets disheartened because he isnt playing over a proven NBA vet who just came off one of his better NBA seasons.

You play who is better. Unless you think Davis has suddenly become much much worse offensively over the course of an off-season, then you keep playing him. Even with him sucking a load of ***, he still has decent rebounding numbers and excellent advanced defensive metrics.

The numbers say that Ed doesn't deserve to play right now. When he's on, the offense is 4v5, every time.

Bradley has played 18 games to put out the stats I mentioned. 18 games is about a quarter of the season. This is not 5 or 10 games. 18 games is territory where you sit up and take notice.
 
In any case, Ed will get many opportunities. He will need to start playing like he has in previous seasons pretty quickly. Because if this continues for the whole season, and the change isn't made, you can chalk this up to Quin's list of things that unfortunately would go to the category of why he was a bad coach this year.
 
The numbers say that Ed doesn't deserve to play right now. When he's on, the offense is 4v5, every time.

Bradley has played 18 games
to put out the stats I mentioned. 18 games is about a quarter of the season. This is not 5 or 10 games. 18 games is territory where you sit up and take notice.
Bruh half of those are from garbage time blowout games. The guy has played 164 minutes, or about 3 games worth of starting minutes.

And the numbers still say, despite Davis playing like **** and being injured, that he is the far superior defender.
 
Bruh half of those are from garbage time blowout games. The guy has played 164 minutes, or about 3 games worth of starting minutes.

And the numbers still say, despite Davis playing like **** and being injured, that he is the far superior defender.

He certainly showed against the championship contending Warriors that he is a superior defender.

I've made my point, and it's a valid one. No point in debating in circles with you any further.

Have a nice day.
 
He certainly showed against the championship contending Warriors that he is a superior defender.

I've made my point, and it's a valid one. No point in debating in circles with you any further.

Have a nice day.
Your point isnt close to valid. No NBA coach trying to win games would disregard the context of Davis's career like you have.
 
Back
Top