What? That's the dumbest **** I've ever heard.
How is it dumb? It limits the trades that are being done, lets the game move quicker, puts more emphasis on making better deals.
What? That's the dumbest **** I've ever heard.
How is it dumb? It limits the trades that are being done, lets the game move quicker, puts more emphasis on making better deals.
Not sure why? When he made the trade for Porter, it was to get Klay Thompson. He clearly took Porter as an upgrade in value over available picks, but wanted to flip him for a (nearly) on the clock pick to do something else. As long as he's not holding things up to do it. . . what's the harm. Kid can hustle. It's entertaining to watch him work his strategy.
How exactly did me trading Porter for a pick two picks away make the game slow down?
Not sure why? When he made the trade for Porter, it was to get Klay Thompson. He clearly took Porter as an upgrade in value over available picks, but wanted to flip him for a (nearly) on the clock pick to do something else. As long as he's not holding things up to do it. . . what's the harm. Kid can hustle. It's entertaining to watch him work his strategy.
Fair enough. I can see why some would feel that way.I wasn't speaking about WC's trade specifically. I think that not being able to trade a player you traded for works better than putting a specific number as a limit. Forces you to commit to your trades and think upon them. This endless trading, in my opinion, even if it doesn't slow the game, just muddles the game.
Looking to move around a bit. Lillard, Hood and upcoming picks (#60 and #69) could be available for the right deal coming back my way. PM me if interested. Thanks.
Dragic is a steal at #55