What's new

2019 Trade Deadline Discussion

Company man David Locke is going live at 1:30 EST through the deadline if anyone is interested.

Doubt that means anything either way but l imagine he'll being doing spin or damage control depending on what happens.
 
This will be the reason why we don't make any moves, trying to wait this out.

Get Niko.

Yeah. If the deal is Rubio, expirings, 1st and 2nd, leave it as is until Memphis pulls their head out of the buns and start pushing elsewhere. Utah still has plenty of ammo to make tweaks while still leaving the Conely offer on the table.
 
I'm sure Utah is capable of discussing other trades.

You're right. But I don't think they'll act on any deals as I get the feeling they've got tunnel vision.

Utah isnt going to trade a first for Mitotic, regardless of any outcome with Conley.

You're right. They won't. But perhaps they should.
 
Barnes is completely antithetical to how Utah plays offense. Ball stopper who can't pass. I don't even think its a selfish thing, like he just can't pass.

The Mavs fans in my group DM where praising the heavens when the trade came through.

There are fans on this site that think Rudy should come off the bench...


A little ball stopping wouldn’t be bad at times... there are times when the ball moves well and it results in us turning a spot Ingles three into a Ricky three or a turnover... ball movement is not the end... it’s the means... a good willing shooter would really help. Our offense is ummmmm pretty average/bad... so maybe changes would be a good thing.
 


If Memphis waits they are stupid asf. The deals will NOT be better at draft time. Teams will have plenty of younger and cheaper options waiting for them in trade/FA/draft. The best deals the Grizzlies can get for Conley and Gasol are the ones they are getting right now.
 
You're right. But I don't think they'll act on any deals as I get the feeling they've got tunnel vision.



You're right. They won't. But perhaps they should.
I don't think they should. If they want to spend a first on a 4 I think the target would be Saric. He has team control, 1 more cheap year, and more potential (IMO).

The question would be what happens to Favors in that scenario. I don't think you could make a Minnesota deal make sense. It' had to be Niang+1st for Saric then move Favors (or Crowder) in a separate deal.
 
I don't think they should. If they want to spend a first on a 4 I think the target would be Saric. He has team control, 1 more cheap year, and more potential (IMO).

The question would be what happens to Favors in that scenario. I don't think you could make a Minnesota deal make sense. It' had to be Niang+1st for Saric then move Favors (or Crowder) in a separate deal.
We could use a trade exception and a pick for Saric. We would need to open a roster spot though.

Sent from my VS995 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Back
Top