I never said I supported Bloomberg over Sanders. Of the potential candidates Bloomberg is my absolute bottom choice.Yes I probably got mad at this BS because you morons just cry contrarian anytime I disagree with you.
Now your drunk *** supports Mike Bloomberg over Bernie despite Bernie being the popular choice. Kind of like you're the contrarian....
Get on board or not. Bernie 2020 ya bish
I haven't heard any of that on the news. You want to link me to the news where I would have been brainwashed to believe that?This word vomit has been brought to you by cable news media. Thank you for taking in our bs talking points
I believe that if he gets elected you will quickly be proven wrong. Rich people didn't get rich (or hold on to wealth) because of stupidity. If they think their money is at risk in this country due to ideas like wealth taxes, etc. they will move as much as they can to protect it. When people start moving money out of the markets it starts to tank, and convinces more people to move their money. It's the opposite of what many people did with their money when Trump made it more lucrative to invest it in our country.There's no reason to believe Sander's presidency would or even could tank the economy, so that's exactly what you are saying.
It's not a difficult concept, at all. These people didn't become filthy rich throwing their money around to us peasants. They will protect themselves before losing a literal fortune to help you and I.I believe that if he gets elected you will quickly be proven wrong. Rich people didn't get rich (or hold on to wealth) because of stupidity. If they think their money is at risk in this country due to ideas like wealth taxes, etc. they will move as much as they can to protect it. When people start moving money out of the markets it starts to tank, and convinces more people to move their money. It's the opposite of what many people did with their money when Trump made it more lucrative to invest it in our country.
Do you think Sanders will be capable of compromise if that means violating his ideology?
I think you are completely wrong about why Sanders would hurt the economy. It's rare to meet a rich person who doesn't want the economy to thrive (I've never met one and I deal with rich people for a living).Maybe he is saying that Sanders becomes president. Sanders is kind of seen as anti rich/pro poor (no idea if this is true but I think he is seen in that light). The rich (who control the money) **** things up intentionally in a form of protest for us electing a dude who would try to even up the wealth inequality a bit.
Idk but I think Wes is somewhat correct that the economy could take a hit from Sanders being elected. And Wes isn't even close to the first person to float that idea. I have heard it a lot.
I like Bernie a lot btw
Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app