What's new

2020 Presidential election

No I dont. I make enough money. I dont need it. I do know how economics work, and that check is going to cause more problems than it helps.

I think it is a good idea way down the road once robots take over, and the robots fix the robots, but we are still a long ways from that.

Throwing money at incompetence is a bad investment. Its why socialism will never work. Give a heroin addict 1000 dollars a month and guarantee they are still homeless heroin addicts, and it will probably will just speed up their demise. I know this from personal experience. I have a homeless heroine addicted sister. Ive literally offered to pay for everything to help fix her life. The only condition was getting sober. She couldnt do it.

This isnt just about the homeless and heroin addicts either. Lazy people in general will still be lazy. They will be less motivated to do anything. Which in turn just means more of a burden on productive people. Which ruins your society.

Also inflation. So whats the point?

I make enough money so why should I give two ****s about those who don’t. Not everyone that’s struggling is a lazy ***. And sorry about your sister, sounds like a very unpleasant situation.
 
No I dont. I make enough money. I dont need it. I do know how economics work, and that check is going to cause more problems than it helps.

I think it is a good idea way down the road once robots take over, and the robots fix the robots, but we are still a long ways from that.

Throwing money at incompetence is a bad investment. Its why socialism will never work. Give a heroin addict 1000 dollars a month and guarantee they are still homeless heroin addicts, and it will probably will just speed up their demise. I know this from personal experience. I have a homeless heroine addicted sister. Ive literally offered to pay for everything to help fix her life. The only condition was getting sober. She couldnt do it.

This isnt just about the homeless and heroin addicts either. Lazy people in general will still be lazy. They will be less motivated to do anything. Which in turn just means more of a burden on productive people. Which ruins your society.

Also inflation. So whats the point?
You don't know **** about economics

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
 
Rich people are generally lazier.

most poor people are busting their asses trying to buy enough formula for the baby.

but it is fun to bash the poor. It makes us feel so superior.
 
Rich people are generally lazier.

most poor people are busting their asses trying to buy enough formula for the baby.

but it is fun to bash the poor. It makes us feel so superior.

So you are lazy? You told me once you pay more in taxes than I make.

If you cant afford a baby, why are you having one?

You are more than welcome to contribute to poor people. I dont think anything is wrong with that. Trying to force other people to is immoral. You are basically for slavery if you feel that way.

Not every poor person is a victim. In fact most of them arent in this country. Nobody forces no one to not study and do well in school. Nobody is forcing anyone to make poor decisions in life like spend money on pot or beer instead of investing. Or just being bad with money in general. You have to know that that is part of the equation right?

You know what all this virtue signaling and promoting socialism is right? You arent just anti-Trump. You are....you guessed it, a - EL I Bee E ARE A EL. Lmao. Busted
 
I make enough money so why should I give two ****s about those who don’t. Not everyone that’s struggling is a lazy ***. And sorry about your sister, sounds like a very unpleasant situation.

You are more than welcome to volunteer your own money/slash labor to help struggling people. There is nothing wrong with that. I think its a noble thing to do.

Do you think its ok to force other people to do the same? How do you even know if those people can even spare any money or time to help?
 
What about Bernie? Was he there? If so, what were your thoughts on him?

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app

I’m just glad Bernie was there. I don’t know if many who could’ve had a heart attack and looked as good as he did. I thought Bernie did his thing. He always makes a lot of sense and stays on message. He’s very disciplined and articulates well his message. If he were to be the nominee I’d enthusiastically vote for him. I just don’t think he’s got enough support to be electable. Hope I’m wrong, I really like him and I thought he looked good last night.
 
If you cant afford a baby, why are you having one?

So you are judging someone who busts their *** to feed their kids a good meal? That's special. Puff up your chest, you are a great and proud American. Or a total embarrassment. One of those two, I'm sure.
 
I’m just glad Bernie was there. I don’t know if many who could’ve had a heart attack and looked as good as he did. I thought Bernie did his thing. He always makes a lot of sense and stays on message. He’s very disciplined and articulates well his message. If he were to be the nominee I’d enthusiastically vote for him. I just don’t think he’s got enough support to be electable. Hope I’m wrong, I really like him and I thought he looked good last night.

He had enough support the last time around but, superdelegates...
 
You know what all this virtue signaling and promoting socialism is right? You arent just anti-Trump. You are....you guessed it, a - EL I Bee E ARE A EL. Lmao. Busted

So your logic is that because I don't think all poor people are lazy, that makes me a liberal. Check the "most idiotic thing said on the internet box" -- you win again!!


It really doesn't bother me that you call me a liberal, since I like many liberals and they are good and fine people. It just makes you look dumber all the time, since you never have any evidence to back up your claim.


You really need to stop shadow boxing, lying about what people have said and framing them into your argument.
 
Last edited:
You know what all this virtue signaling and promoting socialism is right?

Yes, but apparently you don't.

Virtue signaling is the conspicuous expression of moral values.

For example, if someone were to say "If you cant afford a baby, why are you having one?" that person would be conspicuously expressing their moral value that only rich people should have children and poor people who have children are morally deficient.

On the other hand, someone who posts that wealth does not necessarily signal that a person works harder would be the opposite of virtue signaling, especially if it came from someone who is not poor.

Your notion that conservatives do not virtue signal is simply hilarious.
 
So you are lazy? You told me once you pay more in taxes than I make.

It was in response to you telling me that I always had my hand out and was living off the government like all liberals do. I couldn't resist the temptation to again expose your foolishness, although I do regret posting that since the amount of money people make is completely irrelevant to their worth as a human being, as I tell my kids all the time. You probably think that is a liberal idea, so go on and spout further nonsense.
 
Back
Top