You’re overthinking this and that is not my point. My point is simply that there is literal opportunity cost with Luka relative to Wemby in the form of $30 million in cap. Do with that cap whatever you want.
That list is extremely short… LeBron… who else?
Yep. I view 3 and D guys as having that very defined role.
That is certainly the truth.
I would rather have Luka over Scoot. If the Jazz get Wemby then I would roll the dice and keep him.
My simple answer is no. If Wemby hits, Jazz are a perennial contender for years. If the Mavs are willing to move Luka, I’d pick Wemby and then make them an offer that would be hard to refuse. If that doesn’t work, then I move onto the next young, but disgruntled star to hit the market.
And thats fair. I wouldn't criticize anyone who would take wemby. The only thing I would criticize was the post that said that in a few years we will look back at the scenario as a crazy stupid question because Wemby will be such the obvious choice. Maybe Wemby will be better than luka but luka is still an amazing surefire all star superstar who is almost a lock for the hall of fame at 24 years of age. Its not like wemby is the obvious or easy choice.
IF is the key word here.
He had Brunson... he had Zinger... I get that those guys aren't amazing but both have been better outside the Luka shadow. Luka will help 3 and D guys and rim rollers tremendously. Other guys that need the ball will be worse with him. Harden needed CP3 and he really had to bend around Harden.
